Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-030005House Oversight

Alleged involvement of a New Jersey businessman (Ribis) and Steve Bannon in Trump’s 1989 bankruptcy rescue and 1995 casino IPO

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-030005
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Alleged involvement of a New Jersey businessman (Ribis) and Steve Bannon in Trump’s 1989 bankruptcy rescue and 1995 casino IPO The passage provides a specific claim that a person named Ribis, together with Steve Bannon and Steve Bollenbach, assisted Donald Trump during his 1989 bankruptcy and orchestrated a 1995 IPO that restored his wealth. While it names high‑profile actors, it lacks concrete details such as dates, amounts, or documented transactions, making it a moderate‑strength lead that warrants verification but is not yet actionable. Key insights: Ribis, described as the son of Italian immigrants, allegedly worked with Steve Bannon on Trump’s 1989 bankruptcy rescue.; Steve Bollenbach (later CEO of Hilton Hotels) is said to have been part of the team that persuaded creditors to let Trump keep his casino assets.; The 1995 IPO of a gaming company, purportedly orchestrated by Ribis, is claimed to have restored Trump’s wealth.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightmedium-importancetrumpbankruptcyipocasinofinancial-misconduct
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Trump meets with top health‑care executives at Mar‑a‑Lago amid ACA repeal push

The passage lists specific senior executives from major medical institutions and two billionaire CEOs meeting the president‑elect, suggesting possible influence on health‑care policy. It provides name Meeting took place on Dec. 28, 2016 at Mar‑a‑Lago, Palm Beach. Attendees included CEOs of Mayo Clinic, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Partners HealthCare, Cleveland Clini No donors to Trump’s campaign among

4p
House OversightUnknown

iMessage thread hints at paid media production, high‑level political figures, and covert coordination with foreign interests

iMessage thread hints at paid media production, high‑level political figures, and covert coordination with foreign interests The conversation contains multiple actionable clues – a $100k invoice, references to a ‘cast’ for filming, mentions of Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, Steve Bannon, Michael Wolff, and Chinese market manipulation – that suggest a coordinated media or influence operation involving powerful political actors and foreign financial interests. While the specifics are vague, the repeated references to payments, legal arrangements, and government sensitivity provide concrete follow‑up leads (e.g., trace the $100k invoice, identify the production crew, locate the ‘letter to Burke’, and verify the alleged Chinese market influence). The content is moderately controversial and ties to high‑profile individuals, warranting further investigation. Key insights: Reference to sending an invoice for $100k to Darren – potential payment for services.; Discussion of assembling a ‘cast’ and filming on an island, with government interest in controlling press.; Mentions of Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, and Bannon in a context suggesting exploitation or coordinated messaging.

1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01615550

7p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01656066

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02518013

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

FD-302 (Rev. 5-8-10)

FD-302 (Rev. 5-8-10) RO UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Date of entry 06/25/2020 (U//FOUO) On 05/04/2020 from approximately 3:30 PM to 4:40 PM, CHARLES "CHUCK" JOHNSON, Social Security Account Number (SSN) date of birth (DOB) , telephone number , was interviewed via phone, by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Special Agents (SA) and . After being advised of the identity of the interviewing Agents and the nature of the interview, JOHNSON provided the following information: (U//FOLIO) At the beginning of the interview, Agents thanked JOHNSON for taking the time to follow up on topics from a prior phone call with Agents on 04/28/2020. JOHNSON expressed concerns with talking to Agents because he did not want to possibly incriminate himself. JOHNSON was concerned with former contacts acquired from past business ventures in the marijuana business. JOHNSON was hesitant to further discuss STEVE BANNON with Agents. JOHNSON believed BANNON to be

4p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.