Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-030651House Oversight

Internal email discussing removal of Steve Bannon by September 2017

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-030651
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Internal email discussing removal of Steve Bannon by September 2017 The passage is a brief, informal email exchange that merely speculates that Steve Bannon will be ousted by September 2017 to protect Donald Trump’s image. It provides no concrete names beyond Bannon and Trump, no dates beyond a vague timeframe, no transactions, and no actionable leads. While it mentions high‑profile figures, the claim is speculative, already widely reported, and offers no novel evidence for investigation. Key insights: Sender predicts Bannon will be removed by September 2017.; Rationale given: Bannon is drawing attention away from Donald Trump.; Email includes standard confidentiality disclaimer.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightpolitical-rumorssteve-bannondonald-trumpwhite-house-staff-turnover
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Trump meets with top health‑care executives at Mar‑a‑Lago amid ACA repeal push

The passage lists specific senior executives from major medical institutions and two billionaire CEOs meeting the president‑elect, suggesting possible influence on health‑care policy. It provides name Meeting took place on Dec. 28, 2016 at Mar‑a‑Lago, Palm Beach. Attendees included CEOs of Mayo Clinic, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Partners HealthCare, Cleveland Clini No donors to Trump’s campaign among

4p
House OversightUnknown

iMessage thread hints at paid media production, high‑level political figures, and covert coordination with foreign interests

iMessage thread hints at paid media production, high‑level political figures, and covert coordination with foreign interests The conversation contains multiple actionable clues – a $100k invoice, references to a ‘cast’ for filming, mentions of Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, Steve Bannon, Michael Wolff, and Chinese market manipulation – that suggest a coordinated media or influence operation involving powerful political actors and foreign financial interests. While the specifics are vague, the repeated references to payments, legal arrangements, and government sensitivity provide concrete follow‑up leads (e.g., trace the $100k invoice, identify the production crew, locate the ‘letter to Burke’, and verify the alleged Chinese market influence). The content is moderately controversial and ties to high‑profile individuals, warranting further investigation. Key insights: Reference to sending an invoice for $100k to Darren – potential payment for services.; Discussion of assembling a ‘cast’ and filming on an island, with government interest in controlling press.; Mentions of Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, and Bannon in a context suggesting exploitation or coordinated messaging.

1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01615550

7p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01656066

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02518013

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

FD-302 (Rev. 5-8-10)

FD-302 (Rev. 5-8-10) RO UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Date of entry 06/25/2020 (U//FOUO) On 05/04/2020 from approximately 3:30 PM to 4:40 PM, CHARLES "CHUCK" JOHNSON, Social Security Account Number (SSN) date of birth (DOB) , telephone number , was interviewed via phone, by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Special Agents (SA) and . After being advised of the identity of the interviewing Agents and the nature of the interview, JOHNSON provided the following information: (U//FOLIO) At the beginning of the interview, Agents thanked JOHNSON for taking the time to follow up on topics from a prior phone call with Agents on 04/28/2020. JOHNSON expressed concerns with talking to Agents because he did not want to possibly incriminate himself. JOHNSON was concerned with former contacts acquired from past business ventures in the marijuana business. JOHNSON was hesitant to further discuss STEVE BANNON with Agents. JOHNSON believed BANNON to be

4p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.