Duplicate Document
This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:
Fragmentary email chain referencing Bannon, Charlie Rose, Brett Ratner with vague remarksFragmentary email chain referencing Bannon, Charlie Rose, Brett Ratner with vague remarks
Fragmentary email chain referencing Bannon, Charlie Rose, Brett Ratner with vague remarks The passage contains only brief, informal email snippets with no concrete allegations, dates, transactions, or actionable details. It mentions high‑profile names (Bannon, Charlie Rose, Brett Ratner) but provides no clear link to misconduct or financial flows, making it a low‑value, speculative lead. Key insights: Mentions "Bannon" in a dismissive comment about tax code.; References "Charlie rose is next" and "brett ratner now" without context.; Emails are dated November 1‑2, 2017, between a "Reid Weingarten" and "jeffrey E."
Summary
Fragmentary email chain referencing Bannon, Charlie Rose, Brett Ratner with vague remarks The passage contains only brief, informal email snippets with no concrete allegations, dates, transactions, or actionable details. It mentions high‑profile names (Bannon, Charlie Rose, Brett Ratner) but provides no clear link to misconduct or financial flows, making it a low‑value, speculative lead. Key insights: Mentions "Bannon" in a dismissive comment about tax code.; References "Charlie rose is next" and "brett ratner now" without context.; Emails are dated November 1‑2, 2017, between a "Reid Weingarten" and "jeffrey E."
Persons Referenced (5)
“ov 1, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Weingarten, Reid ; wrote: Charlie rose is next Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.”
Brett Ratner“1, 2017 10:07 AM To: Weingarten, Reid Subject: brett ratner now. oy please note HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030675”
Reid Weingarten“told you so On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Weingarten, Reid hii. wrote: Bannon won...tax code fucks rich peo”
Marc Rich“en, Reid hii. wrote: Bannon won...tax code fucks rich people Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. F”
Steve Bannon“, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Weingarten, Reid hii. wrote: Bannon won...tax code fucks rich people Sent from my Bl”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
Informal email exchange hinting at political maneuvering and tax policy grievances
Informal email exchange hinting at political maneuvering and tax policy grievances The messages contain vague, speculative statements about Trump firing Mueller, Bannon's influence, and tax code impacts, but lack concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable details. They provide minimal investigative value and no novel information beyond widely reported political commentary. Key insights: Reference to Trump potentially firing Special Counsel Mueller.; Mention of Steve Bannon's perceived victory and criticism of the tax code.; Allusion to a possible role for 'Rosenstein' in an unspecified action.
Vague email chain discussing firing Mueller and Bannon's political win
Vague email chain discussing firing Mueller and Bannon's political win The emails contain only speculative remarks about firing Mueller and a vague comment about Bannon winning, without any concrete details, names of officials beyond public figures, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. The content is low‑value speculation and offers little investigative direction. Key insights: Mentions of "Trump is going to fire Mueller" suggests interest in removing the special counsel.; Reference to "Bannon won" hints at perceived political success for Steve Bannon.; Allusions to tax code affecting the rich indicate possible grievance but no specifics.
Informal email exchange speculating about Mueller filing sealed indictments against Trump family members
Informal email exchange speculating about Mueller filing sealed indictments against Trump family members The passage consists of casual, speculative emails with no concrete evidence, dates, or actionable details linking any high‑level officials to wrongdoing. It merely suggests a hypothetical sealed indictment and expresses personal opinions, offering minimal investigative value. Key insights: Mentions possibility of sealed indictments against Jared Kushner, Ivanka Trump, and Donald Trump Jr.; References Mueller and Rosenstein in a speculative context.; Shows personal frustration about potential political interference.
Fragmentary email chain referencing Bannon, Charlie Rose, Brett Ratner with vague remarks
The passage contains only brief, informal email snippets with no concrete allegations, dates, transactions, or actionable details. It mentions high‑profile names (Bannon, Charlie Rose, Brett Ratner) b Mentions "Bannon" in a dismissive comment about tax code. References "Charlie rose is next" and "brett ratner now" without context. Emails are dated November 1‑2, 2017, between a "Reid Weingarten" an
Informal email chain speculating Trump will fire Mueller and referencing Bannon
Informal email chain speculating Trump will fire Mueller and referencing Bannon The passage contains vague, unverified speculation about Trump firing Mueller and a generic comment about Bannon and tax policy. It lacks concrete details, dates, transactions, or actionable leads, offering little investigative value beyond confirming personal opinions. Key insights: Sender predicts Trump will fire Special Counsel Mueller.; Reference to Steve Bannon winning and tax code affecting the rich.; Multiple informal messages exchanged via BlackBerry smartphones.
Informal email chain mentioning Trump firing Mueller and Bannon winning
Informal email chain mentioning Trump firing Mueller and Bannon winning The passage consists of casual, unsourced email exchanges with vague political commentary and no concrete details, dates, names beyond public figures, or actionable leads. While it references high‑profile individuals (Trump, Mueller, Bannon), it offers no evidence, transactions, or specific allegations to pursue. Key insights: Email timestamps show the conversation occurred in early November 2017.; Participants are identified only as "Reid I. Weingarten" and "Jeffrey E." with personal email addresses.; Comments include speculation that Trump would fire Mueller and that Bannon 'won' regarding tax code issues.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.