Legal brief argues Fifth Amendment privilege blocks House subpoena for Flynn's meetings with Russian officials

Legal brief argues Fifth Amendment privilege blocks House subpoena for Flynn's meetings with Russian officials The passage is a legal argument citing case law to oppose a congressional subpoena of former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn. It does not provide new factual leads, names of meetings, dates, or financial transactions. It merely restates known legal positions and does not reveal undisclosed information about influential actors. Key insights: Cites United States v. Doe, Hubbell, Fisher, and other precedents to argue the subpoena is overly broad.; Claims the subpoena would compel Flynn to create a new document listing meetings with Russian officials, violating the Fifth Amendment.; Notes the lack of specificity in the subpoena regarding individuals, dates, or locations.