Email chain discussing affidavit verification between attorney Tonja Haddad Coleman and Dan Christensen (April 2014)
Email chain discussing affidavit verification between attorney Tonja Haddad Coleman and Dan Christensen (April 2014) The passage contains a routine internal communication about procedural affidavit verification with no mention of high‑profile individuals, financial transactions, or misconduct. It offers minimal investigative value beyond confirming standard notary practice. Key insights: Attorney Tonja Haddad Coleman explains that a law‑enforcement officer’s notarization only attests to the officer’s identity, not the document’s contents.; Dan Christensen asks whether the officer read the affidavit.; Both parties reference adding an e‑filing address to pleadings.
Summary
Email chain discussing affidavit verification between attorney Tonja Haddad Coleman and Dan Christensen (April 2014) The passage contains a routine internal communication about procedural affidavit verification with no mention of high‑profile individuals, financial transactions, or misconduct. It offers minimal investigative value beyond confirming standard notary practice. Key insights: Attorney Tonja Haddad Coleman explains that a law‑enforcement officer’s notarization only attests to the officer’s identity, not the document’s contents.; Dan Christensen asks whether the officer read the affidavit.; Both parties reference adding an e‑filing address to pleadings.
Tags
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.