Email forwards RadarOnline article linking Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein sexual abuse claims
Summary
Email forwards RadarOnline article linking Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein sexual abuse claims The passage merely forwards a publicly available news article without providing new details, names, dates, or transactional information. It offers minimal investigative value beyond confirming that the sender was aware of the article, and the claim is already widely reported. Key insights: Email includes a link to a RadarOnline story about a lawsuit alleging sexual abuse involving Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein.; Sender labels the email as confidential/attorney‑client privileged, but no privileged content is disclosed.; Recipients are internal (Kathy Ruemmler, Darren Indyke, Martin Weinberg) suggesting internal circulation of the article.
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Related Documents (6)
Email discussing strategy to use Donald Trump as a counter‑narrative to upcoming James Patterson book, addressed to Jeffrey Epstein
The passage reveals a private communication in which Michael Wolff advises Jeffrey Epstein to position himself as an anti‑Trump voice to pre‑empt a forthcoming book by James Patterson. It suggests coo Email chain includes Jeffrey Epstein and Michael Wolff discussing a counter‑narrative strategy. Reference to a James Patterson book slated for August 2016 publication. Suggestion to frame Epstein as
Jeffrey Epstein email discusses using anti‑Trump media campaign to counter upcoming James Patterson book
The passage provides a concrete lead that Epstein (or his associates) considered leveraging a public anti‑Trump narrative to distract from a forthcoming book about him. It names specific individuals ( Epstein was aware of an upcoming book attributed to James Patterson slated for August 2016. A strategy was proposed to frame the narrative around Donald Trump to gain political cover. The email menti
Email referencing RadarOnline article on Trump lawsuit alleging sexual abuse linked to Jeffrey Epstein
The passage merely forwards a public news article without providing new specifics, names, dates, or transactional details. It hints at a high‑profile figure (Donald Trump) but offers no actionable int Email includes a link to a RadarOnline story about a lawsuit alleging sexual abuse involving Donald Sender marks the email as confidential/attorney‑client privileged, but no substantive confidential
Email chain discussing interview questions for Jeff Epstein that reference alleged visits by Donald Trump to Epstein’s Palm Beach estate and possib...
The passage contains a concrete set of questions linking former President Donald Trump to alleged sexual‑related activities at Jeffrey Epstein’s properties, including possible video recordings and cam Matt Williams is preparing a list of questions for Epstein that explicitly mention Trump’s alleged p Allegations include Trump watching under‑age girls try on bikinis and possibly being recorded on h
Internal email discussing strategy to counter a forthcoming James Patterson book on Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting use of Donald Trump as a narrative ...
The passage reveals a coordinated effort by Jeffrey Epstein’s associates to shape media coverage of an upcoming book, including a suggestion to leverage Donald Trump for political cover. It identifies Epstein’s team is aware of a James Patterson‑branded book slated for August 2016 and seeks to pre‑em The email proposes using Donald Trump as a ‘anti‑Trump’ voice to provide political cover for Epste
Forwarded Reuters email about 2016 lawsuit alleging Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994
The passage provides a concrete lead – a federal lawsuit filed in California in 2016 that names Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump as alleged perpetrators. It includes names, dates, and a specific legal Federal lawsuit filed in California in 2016 alleges rape by Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump in 1994 Email chain includes Reuters correspondent seeking comment from Epstein The email is marked privil
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.