Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01301094Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01301094

From: To: Sent: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacatio Erdoes, Ma E < 7/20/2011 3:25:03 AM for setllement purposed only eJim was very kind in offering me 5 million to settle the funds issue and 2.2 to settle the stock claim. Again very professionally jim pointed out that jes had told him I agreed to be treated like a retail client. Therefore..we had in essence agreed to 5 .. What I told jim was that we were still in dispute over what amounts were in dispute . It is difficult to underst

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01301094
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

From: To: Sent: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacatio Erdoes, Ma E < 7/20/2011 3:25:03 AM for setllement purposed only eJim was very kind in offering me 5 million to settle the funds issue and 2.2 to settle the stock claim. Again very professionally jim pointed out that jes had told him I agreed to be treated like a retail client. Therefore..we had in essence agreed to 5 .. What I told jim was that we were still in dispute over what amounts were in dispute . It is difficult to underst

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Sent: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacatio Erdoes, Ma E < 7/20/2011 3:25:03 AM for setllement purposed only eJim was very kind in offering me 5 million to settle the funds issue and 2.2 to settle the stock claim. Again very professionally jim pointed out that jes had told him I agreed to be treated like a retail client. Therefore..we had in essence agreed to 5 .. What I told jim was that we were still in dispute over what amounts were in dispute . It is difficult to understand how i would recieve the same settlement as a person who put 15 million in the asset backed fund two weeks before the enhanced investment, though I had a confirmantion that 20. 3 million was put in . Jims argumement that the increase value that is reflected on my sunscription doc. should be totally ignored, does not seem fair. I also asked jim , if in arbitration others had received an award greater than 30%, and he told me he could not disclose that information. Mary when you and I are in the same city , i would like to sit down and discuss„ Again, I have a great deal of respect for Jim , and i have vocalized my appreciation for the way he has handled this to date. *********************************************************** The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved SDNY_GM_00078501 Confidential Treatment Requested by JPMorgan Chase JPM-SDNY-00001628 EFTA_00188968 EFTA01301094

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreflected

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.