EFTA Document EFTA01355621
Summary
• (-) O 0 Page 7 OO mm z z r• > r- -o C A *** THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY*" Copyright © 2011 CourtLink Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -n o SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ?) (West Palm Beach) Doe No 8 v. Epstein rn PLAINTIFF: Jane Doe No 8 CD DEFENDANT: Epstein, Jeffrey WITNESS: Jean Luc Bruhnel Material DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:09cv80802 FILING DATE: 5/28/2009 JURISDICTION: Federal Question JUDGE: Marra, Kenneth A NATURE OF SUIT: 360 Personal Inju
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
EFTA Document EFTA01355632
• C) O 0 Z Z Page 20 OO mm z z r• > r- -o C *** THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY*" Copyright © 2011 CourtLink Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -n o SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ?) (West Palm Beach) Jane Doe No 6 v. Epstein cp PLAINTIFF: Jane Doe No 6 CD DEFENDANT: Epstein, Jeffrey AMICUS: United States of America WITNESS: Jean Luc Bruhnel Material DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:08cv80994 FILING DATE: 9/10/2008 JURISDICTION: Federal Question JUDGE: Marra. K
Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 1 of 100 nsor & Associates RepornnE sad Transcripoon. Inc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 75 Q. Because Mr. Epstein never came to your dad's house, correct? A. Correct. Q. And no one who worked for Mr. Epstein ever did something to your dad's tires, did they? MR. LEOPOLD: Objection. Lack of foundation, predicate. Don't guess. BY MR. TEIN: Q. It's not true that Mr. Epstein almost killed your father, is it? MR. LEOPOLD: Objection. Asked and answered, lack of foundation, predicate. BY MR. TEIN: Q. You can answer. A. No. Q. Now you told the police that you didn't know who was in the car with you and IIIIIII on the day you went to Epstein's house, didn't you? A. Yes. Q. And that was a lie, wasn't it? A. It's the truth. Q. You told the police that there was someone in the car next to you and you specifically said y
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: Docket #1:19-cv-08673- DOE, JANE, KPF-DCF Plaintiff, - against - INDYKE, et al., : New York, New York June 24, 2020 Defendants. TELEPHONE CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HONORABLE JUDGE DEBRA C. FREEMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MAGISTRATE JUDGE APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff: For the Defendants: KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP BY: ROBERTA A. KAPLAN, ESQ. KATE L. DONIGER, ESQ. 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7110 New York, New York 10118 212-763-0883 TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP BY: BENNET J. MOSKOWITZ, ESQ. 875 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 212-704-6087 TROUTMAN SANDERS BY: MOLLY S. DIRAGO, ESQ. 227 W. Monroe Street, Suite 3900 Chicago, Illinois 60606 312-759-1926 Transcription Service: Carole Ludwig, Transcription Services 155 East Fourth Street #3C New York, New York 10009 Phone: (212) 420-0771 Email: [email protected] Proceedings conducted telephonically and recorded by electronic so
Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22
Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-LAP Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support Of Iler Objections to tnsealinu Sealed Materials Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue EFTA00074964 Ca_QatIgt24743tictoWneDbtOrfiefiVIMOXIle?BOWERKVaffizte12401 22 Introduction This Court asked the parties to brief three issues: "(a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to an item, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction of the item, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access to the item." DE 1044 at 1. Plaintiff and the Miami Herald's responses improperly afford the highest level of presumption to discovery dispute documents, deny that any co
EFTA Document EFTA01379190
• (-) O 0 Page 7 OO mm z z r• r -o C A *** THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY*" Copyright © 2011 CourtLink Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -n o SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ?) (West Palm Beach) Doe No 8 v. Epstein rn PLAINTIFF: Jane Doe No 8 CD DEFENDANT: Epstein, Jeffrey WITNESS: Jean Luc Bruhnel Material DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:09cv80802 FILING DATE: 5/28/2009 JURISDICTION: Federal Question JUDGE: Marra, Kenneth A NATURE OF SUIT: 360 Personal Injury
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2008 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. JANE DOE NO. 3, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. / JANE DOE NO. 4, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. JANE DOE NO. 5, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. CASE NO.: 08-80119-CIV-KAM-L ---- DC JUL 2 8 2008 STEVEN CLERK M LAD U -EL-r-EyeAgr CASE NO.: 08-80232-CIV- -KAM-L CASE NO.: 08-80380-CIV-KAM-LRJ CASE NO.: 08-80381-CIV-KAM-LRJ FILED UNDER SEAL. EPSTEIN'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STAY This motion is filed under seal because the deferred-prosecution agreement between the United States Attorney's Office and Mr. Epstein. discussed herein, contains a confidentiality clause. A motion to seal has been filed contemporaneously. EFTA00222407 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2008 Page 2 of 13 The Pendine Federal Criminal Action In 2006, a Florida state grand jury indicted Jeffrey Epstei
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.