EFTA Document EFTA01355632
Summary
• C) O 0 Z Z Page 20 OO mm z z r• > r- -o C *** THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY*" Copyright © 2011 CourtLink Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -n o SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ?) (West Palm Beach) Jane Doe No 6 v. Epstein cp PLAINTIFF: Jane Doe No 6 CD DEFENDANT: Epstein, Jeffrey AMICUS: United States of America WITNESS: Jean Luc Bruhnel Material DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:08cv80994 FILING DATE: 9/10/2008 JURISDICTION: Federal Question JUDGE: Marra. K
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2011 Page 1 of 54
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2011 Page 1 of 54 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIME VICTIM RIGHTS ACT AND REQUEST FOR A HEARING ON APPROPRIATE REMEDIES Respondent, United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies, and states: I. INTRODUCTION The issue before this Court is whether the petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, had any rights under 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a), in the absence of a criminal charge being filed in the Southern District of Florida, charging someone with the commission of a federal crime in which petitione
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. COPY JEFFREY EPSTEIN, SARAH KELLEN, ADRIANA ROSS, a/k/a Adriana Mucinska, and NADIA MARCINKOVA, Defendants. TESTIMONY OF SPECIAL AGENT Federal Grand Jury 07-103 Federal Building U.S. Courthouse West Palm Beach, Florida Tuesday, March 18, 2008 APPEARANCES: Assistant United States Attorney Foreperson OFFICIAL REPORTING SERVICE, LLC (954) 467-8204 EFTA00179301 / / 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 I. The sworn testimony of SPECIAL AGENT was taken before the Federal Grand Jury, West Palm Beach Division, Federal Building, U.S. Courthouse, Palm Beach County, State of Florida, on Tuesday, March 18, 2008. , Certified Court Reporter and Notary Public, State of Florida, Official Reporting Service, LLC, 524 South Andrew
Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22
Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-LAP Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support Of Iler Objections to tnsealinu Sealed Materials Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue EFTA00074964 Ca_QatIgt24743tictoWneDbtOrfiefiVIMOXIle?BOWERKVaffizte12401 22 Introduction This Court asked the parties to brief three issues: "(a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to an item, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction of the item, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access to the item." DE 1044 at 1. Plaintiff and the Miami Herald's responses improperly afford the highest level of presumption to discovery dispute documents, deny that any co
Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 06)12'2009 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendants. Defendant's, Epstein. Motion To Dismiss, For More Definite Statement & To Strike Directed To Plaintiff Jane Doe's Amended Complaint, With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law Defendant, Jeffery Epstein, by and through his undersigned counsel, moves to dismiss and for more definite statement of Plaintiff, Jane Doe's Amended Complaint. Rules 12(b)(6), and 12(e) and (f), Fed.R.Civ.P. (2008). In support of his motion, Defendant states: I. The Amended Complaint The Amended Complaint attempts to allege four counts, entitled Count I - "Sexual Battery Upon a Minor," Count II — "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC §22 55," Count III — "Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress," Count IV — "Civil Remedy for Criminal Practices" and Count VI — "Cause
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MS. MAXWELL'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS FIVE AND SIX OF THE SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT BECAUSE THE ALLEGED MISSTATEMENTS ARE NOT PERJURIOUS AS A MATTER OF LAW Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00097378 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ii TABLE OF EXHIBITS iii I. The Defamation Action I II. The Questions Were Fundamentally, and Fatally, Ambiguous 6 III. The Questions and Answers Were Immaterial 10 CONCLUSION 10 Certificate of Service 12 i EFTA00097379 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Bronston v. United States, 409 U.S. 352 (1973) 6, 7, 10 v. Maxwell, 325 F. Supp. 3d 428 (S.D.N.Y. 2018
EFTA Document EFTA01379212
C 0 O 0 T Page 33 OO mm z z r• > r- mo C *** THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY*" Copyright © 2011 CourtLink Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -n o SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ?) (West Palm Beach) Doe No 4 v. Epstein cp PLAINTIFF: Jane Doe No 4 CD DEFENDANT: Epstein, Jeffrey AMICUS: United States of America WITNESS: Jean Luc Bruhnel Material DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:08cv80380 FILING DATE: 4/14/2008 JURISDICTION: Diversity JUDGE: Marra. Kenneth A REFERR
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.