1 duplicate copy in the archive
efta-efta01355634
EFTA Document EFTA01355634
O• 0 zz T 5 5 Doe V. Epstein 9:08cv80893 m m zz > > r r- Fax: Email: -o DEFENDANT ATTORNEY(S): Jack Alan Goldberger [LEAD ATTORNEY;ATTORNEY TO] Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 I ach, FI_ Lasp401-5012 Fax: Email: 'n Michael James Pike [ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED] Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 F.Ia 1-2918 Fax: Email: z0 rn cp 3z 0 8 o 0 CO cn CO Robert Deweese Critton, Jr. [LEAD ATTORNEY;ATTORNE
Summary
O• 0 zz T 5 5 Doe V. Epstein 9:08cv80893 m m zz > > r r- Fax: Email: -o DEFENDANT ATTORNEY(S): Jack Alan Goldberger [LEAD ATTORNEY;ATTORNEY TO] Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 I ach, FI_ Lasp401-5012 Fax: Email: 'n Michael James Pike [ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED] Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 F.Ia 1-2918 Fax: Email: z0 rn cp 3z 0 8 o 0 CO cn CO Robert Deweese Critton, Jr. [LEAD ATTORNEY;ATTORNE
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (3)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
9:08CV80893401-2918401-5012Related Documents (6)
EFTA Document EFTA01387839
Page 4 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139535, * Jeffrey Marc Herman, LEAD ATTORNEY, Herman & Mermelstein, Miami, FL USA; Stuart S. Mermelstein, LEAD ATTORNEY, Herman Law, Boca Raton, FL USA. For Jane Doe No. 6, Plaintiff (9:08-cv-80994-KAM): Adam D. Horowitz, LEAD ATTORNEY, Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos, Lehrman, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, FL USA; Jeffrey Marc Herman, LEAD ATTORNEY, Herman & Mermelstein, Miami, FL USA; Stuart S. Mermelstein, LEAD ATTORNEY, Herman Law, Boca Raton, FL USA. F
EFTA Document EFTA01306347
PLEA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THE FOLLOWING IS TO REFLECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SI- TTLEMEN1 Name: Jeffrey E. Epstein Plea Guey Caged . Charge Count Lesear 019Ice 06CF009454AMB Felony Solicitation of Prostitution 1 No 3 FEL ring Person Under 18 for Prostitution 1 No 2FFL PSI: Wafeed/Not Required _X RequirediRequested AWUOICATION: Ac[indicate Ix SENTENCE: On 06C F009454AM6, the Defendant s sentenced to 12 Balm Beech County Detention Facility, wth credit br 1 (one) da
Attorney Bradley Edwards alleges Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement, 5th Amendment tactics, and a unique George Rush tape as key evidence ...
The affidavit details a non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Epstein from federal charges, claims that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment to block discovery, and describes a purportedly Epstein secured a federal non‑prosecution agreement that barred criminal charges for ~30 victims in All co‑defendants and Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, leaving plaintiffs with no substantive
PLEA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01306347
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures The filing enumerates numerous specific leads that, if verified, tie Jeffrey Epstein to a wide network of powerful individuals (Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, etc.) and to alleged obstruction of federal investigations, witness intimidation, and a non‑prosecution agreement. It also references concrete documents (exhibits, deposition excerpts, flight logs, FBI emails) that could be pursued for forensic analysis, discovery requests, or FOIA requests. The combination of high‑profile actors, alleged criminal conduct, and detailed procedural allegations makes this a strong investigative lead. Key insights: Edwards alleges Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering substantive questions, creating adverse inferences.; The motion cites a “Holy Grail” journal allegedly listing underage victims and high‑profile contacts (Trump, Clinton, etc.).; Claims that Epstein’s attorneys (including Alan Dershowitz) may have helped suppress victim testimony and influence the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile...
The filing enumerates numerous specific leads that, if verified, tie Jeffrey Epstein to a wide network of powerful individuals (Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, etc.) an Edwards alleges Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering substantive questions, creati The motion cites a “Holy Grail” journal allegedly listing underage victims and high‑profile contac
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.