Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01357794Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01357794

13 January 2015 HY Corporate Credit Energy Hedging Screen Hedges are short term in nature and most important for 2015 cash flow. To the extent hedges preserve liquidity and operating momentum over the next year for E&Ps, they remain an important tool and differentiator. In particular, should the commodity cycle snap back more quickly than expected, those with hedges that afford more growth-driven capital programs in 2015 can carry that momentum into 2016. However, those E&Ps, which have

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01357794
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

13 January 2015 HY Corporate Credit Energy Hedging Screen Hedges are short term in nature and most important for 2015 cash flow. To the extent hedges preserve liquidity and operating momentum over the next year for E&Ps, they remain an important tool and differentiator. In particular, should the commodity cycle snap back more quickly than expected, those with hedges that afford more growth-driven capital programs in 2015 can carry that momentum into 2016. However, those E&Ps, which have

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
13 January 2015 HY Corporate Credit Energy Hedging Screen Hedges are short term in nature and most important for 2015 cash flow. To the extent hedges preserve liquidity and operating momentum over the next year for E&Ps, they remain an important tool and differentiator. In particular, should the commodity cycle snap back more quickly than expected, those with hedges that afford more growth-driven capital programs in 2015 can carry that momentum into 2016. However, those E&Ps, which have made more drastic capital cuts, will have more ground to cover in terms of ramping production back up to reach optimal efficiency. Looking at the top quartile, one can see higher cost E&Ps protecting against down side (DNR, HK, MPO) while other E&Ps hedged oil price risk out of recent acquisitions (HILCRP in Alaska). The top quartile is significantly more oily (average: 65% of production) and seems to have been more defensive about protecting against oil downside. On the other hand, the bottom quartile averages -55% gas production and given the performance of gas recently, there was less to protect in the way of cash flows there. Page 32 Deutsche Sank Securities Inc. CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0044575 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00190759 EFTA01357794

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.