1 duplicate copy in the archive
efta-efta01379188
EFTA Document EFTA01379188
C 0 00 Z-n Page 5 OO mm z z r > r- mo C *** THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY*" Copyright © 2012 CourtLink Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -n o SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ?) (West Palm Beach) LM v. Espstein cp PLAINTIFF: LM CD DEFENDANT: Epstein, Jeffrey WITNESS: Jean Luc Bruhnel Material DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:09cv81092 FILING DATE: 7/24/2009 JURISDICTION: Federal Question JUDGE: Marra, Kenneth A NATURE OF SUIT: 360 Personal Injury FILING TYPE:
Summary
C 0 00 Z-n Page 5 OO mm z z r > r- mo C *** THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY*" Copyright © 2012 CourtLink Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -n o SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ?) (West Palm Beach) LM v. Espstein cp PLAINTIFF: LM CD DEFENDANT: Epstein, Jeffrey WITNESS: Jean Luc Bruhnel Material DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:09cv81092 FILING DATE: 7/24/2009 JURISDICTION: Federal Question JUDGE: Marra, Kenneth A NATURE OF SUIT: 360 Personal Injury FILING TYPE:
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
9:09CV81092Related Documents (6)
[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation
[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specific actions (e.g., alleged drafting of the NPA, defamatory statements, settlement confidentiality) and dates that could be pursued for documentary evidence, witness interviews, and financial‑flow analysis. If substantiated, the lead would expose potential prosecutorial misconduct and high‑level collusion, generating major public outrage. Key insights: Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz.; Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded Epstein and co‑conspirators.; Acosta, then U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, approved the NPA; later became Trump’s Secretary of Labor.
EFTA Document EFTA01381982
C 0 00 Z 11 Page 5 OO mm z z r > r- mo C *** THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY*" Copyright © 2012 CourtLink Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -n o SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ?) (West Palm Beach) LM v. Espstein cp PLAINTIFF: LM DEFENDANT: Epstein, Jeffrey WITNESS: Jean Luc Bruhnel Material DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:09cv81092 FILING DATE: 7/24/2009 JURISDICTION: Federal Question JUDGE: Marra, Kenneth A NATURE OF SUIT: 360 Personal Injury FILING TYPE: Civ
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures The filing enumerates numerous specific leads that, if verified, tie Jeffrey Epstein to a wide network of powerful individuals (Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, etc.) and to alleged obstruction of federal investigations, witness intimidation, and a non‑prosecution agreement. It also references concrete documents (exhibits, deposition excerpts, flight logs, FBI emails) that could be pursued for forensic analysis, discovery requests, or FOIA requests. The combination of high‑profile actors, alleged criminal conduct, and detailed procedural allegations makes this a strong investigative lead. Key insights: Edwards alleges Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering substantive questions, creating adverse inferences.; The motion cites a “Holy Grail” journal allegedly listing underage victims and high‑profile contacts (Trump, Clinton, etc.).; Claims that Epstein’s attorneys (including Alan Dershowitz) may have helped suppress victim testimony and influence the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
EFTA Document EFTA01355619
• C) O 0 Z - r1 Page 5 OO mm z z r• > r- -o C *** THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY*" Copyright © 2012 CourtLink Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -n o SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ?) (West Palm Beach) LM v. Espstein cp PLAINTIFF: LM DEFENDANT: Epstein, Jeffrey WITNESS: Jean Luc Bruhnel Material DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:09cv81092 FILING DATE: 7/24/2009 JURISDICTION: Federal Question JUDGE: Marra, Kenneth A NATURE OF SUIT: 360 Personal Injury FILING TYP
[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation
The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded
Dershowitz Motion Seeks to Disclose Sealed Deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor] and Cites FOIA Findings on Clinton’s Absence from Epstein Island
The filing reveals a strategy to push a sealed deposition of a key Epstein witness to law‑enforcement agencies, cites former FBI Director Louis Freeh’s opinion that no Secret Service records exist of Dershowitz requests court clarification to share sealed deposition with State and US Attorneys for p Freeh’s FOIA‑based opinion asserts no Secret Service logs of Clinton traveling to Epstein’s island
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.