1 duplicate copy in the archive
efta-efta01381989
EFTA Document EFTA01381989
• c> O 0 z z Page 12 5 5 Doe No 101 v. Epstein 9:09cv80591 m m z z r • r- 305-358-2800 Fax: 305-358-2382 Email: KEZELL[#064]PODHURST.COM -o C Josefsberg, Robert C [COR LD NTC] c Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg Et Al City National Bank Building 25 W Flagler Street Suite 800 Miami, FL, USA 33130-1780 -n 305-358-2800 Fax: 305-358-2382 Email: RJOSEFSBERG[#064]PODHURST.COM P DEFENDANT ATTORNEY(S): Pike, Michael James [COR LD NTC] Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman 303 Banyan Boulevard
Summary
• c> O 0 z z Page 12 5 5 Doe No 101 v. Epstein 9:09cv80591 m m z z r • r- 305-358-2800 Fax: 305-358-2382 Email: KEZELL[#064]PODHURST.COM -o C Josefsberg, Robert C [COR LD NTC] c Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg Et Al City National Bank Building 25 W Flagler Street Suite 800 Miami, FL, USA 33130-1780 -n 305-358-2800 Fax: 305-358-2382 Email: RJOSEFSBERG[#064]PODHURST.COM P DEFENDANT ATTORNEY(S): Pike, Michael James [COR LD NTC] Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman 303 Banyan Boulevard
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (17)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
9:09CV80591bclclaw.comkirkland.compodhurst.comusdoj.govFax: 305-358-2382Fax: 356-7336Fax: 561-253-0164305-358-2382305-358-2800356-7336401-2918561-253-0164561-842-2820954-356-7255PODHURSTRJOSEFSBERGRelated Documents (6)
EFTA Document EFTA01355626
• c> O 0 z z Page 12 5 5 Doe No 101 v. Epstein 9:09cv80591 m m z z r • r- 305-358-2800 Fax: 305-358-2382 Email: KEZELL[#064]PODHURST.COM -o C Josefsberg, Robert C [COR LD NTC] c Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg Et Al City National Bank Building 25 W Flagler Street Suite 800 Miami, FL, USA 33130-1780 -n 305-358-2800 Fax: 305-358-2382 Email: RJOSEFSBERG[#064]PODHURST.COM P DEFENDANT ATTORNEY(S): Pike, Michael James [COR LD NTC] Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman 303 Banyan Boulevard
EFTA Document EFTA01428364
NAME SEARCHED: Jeffrey Epstein (Jeffrey w/2 Epstein ) PWM BIS-RESEARCH performed due diligence research in accordance with the standards set by AML Compliance for your business. We completed thorough searches on your subject name(s) in the required databases and have attached the search results under the correct heading below. Significant negative media results may require escalation to senior business, Legal and Compliance management. Also, all accounts involving PEPs must be escalated
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures The filing enumerates numerous specific leads that, if verified, tie Jeffrey Epstein to a wide network of powerful individuals (Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, etc.) and to alleged obstruction of federal investigations, witness intimidation, and a non‑prosecution agreement. It also references concrete documents (exhibits, deposition excerpts, flight logs, FBI emails) that could be pursued for forensic analysis, discovery requests, or FOIA requests. The combination of high‑profile actors, alleged criminal conduct, and detailed procedural allegations makes this a strong investigative lead. Key insights: Edwards alleges Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering substantive questions, creating adverse inferences.; The motion cites a “Holy Grail” journal allegedly listing underage victims and high‑profile contacts (Trump, Clinton, etc.).; Claims that Epstein’s attorneys (including Alan Dershowitz) may have helped suppress victim testimony and influence the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile...
The filing enumerates numerous specific leads that, if verified, tie Jeffrey Epstein to a wide network of powerful individuals (Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, etc.) an Edwards alleges Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering substantive questions, creati The motion cites a “Holy Grail” journal allegedly listing underage victims and high‑profile contac
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016552
Royal-Southern PCN OWNERNAME1 OWNERNAME2 STREETNAME BLK SITEADDR PADDR1 PADDR2 PADDR3 TOTTAXVAL ACRES PROPUSE CAMA-RESBLD.YEAR BUILT CAMA-RESBLD.EFFECTIVE YEAR NUMBER OF BEDROOMS NUMBER OF FULL BATHROOMS NUMBER OF HALF BATHROOMS STORY HEIGHT CAMA-RESBLD.BUILDING VALUE CAMA-RESBLD.BUILDING AREA TOTAL AREA SQUARE FOOT LIVING AREA CAMA-COMBLD.YEAR BUILT CAMA-COMBLD.EFFECTIVE YEAR NUMBER OF UNITS STORIES CONSTRUCTION TYPE CONSTRUCTION TYPE DESC CAMA-COMBLD.BUILDING VALUE CAMA-COMBLD.BUILDING AREA C
Attorney‑Generated Oversight Memo Accuses DOJ Prosecutors of Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, and Political Motives in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Case
Attorney‑Generated Oversight Memo Accuses DOJ Prosecutors of Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, and Political Motives in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Case The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged DOJ misconduct—including unauthorized subpoenas, misrepresentations to the court, undisclosed financial incentives to witnesses, ex‑parte communications, and leaks to the press—while naming senior DOJ officials (Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip, Assistant U.S. Attorneys Marie Villafana and Jeffrey Sloman) and linking the case to former President Bill Clinton’s notoriety. These allegations, if substantiated, could expose abuse of prosecutorial discretion, potential violations of DOJ ethics rules, and political influence, making it a strong investigative lead. However, much of the material is defensive in nature and repeats known procedural complaints, limiting its novelty and concrete evidentiary hooks. Key insights: Alleged illegal re‑issuance of a grand‑jury subpoena after a Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was signed (July 1 2008 subpoena).; Claims that AUSA Villafana disclosed confidential case details to the New York Times and leaked information to reporter Landon Thomas.; Accusations that Villafana attempted to appoint a personal friend of her live‑in boyfriend as attorney‑representative for victims, suggesting a conflict of interest.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.