Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01386194Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01386194

AGP LP 519 Alpha Group Capital Paul Barrett other manner which the General Partner determines is fair and equitable under the circumstances to all clients, including the Partnership. From the standpoint of the Partnership, simultaneous identical portfolio transactions for the Partnership and the other clients may tend to decrease the prices received, and increase the prices required to be paid, by the Partnership for its portfolio sales and purchases. Where less than the maximum desired num

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01386194
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

AGP LP 519 Alpha Group Capital Paul Barrett other manner which the General Partner determines is fair and equitable under the circumstances to all clients, including the Partnership. From the standpoint of the Partnership, simultaneous identical portfolio transactions for the Partnership and the other clients may tend to decrease the prices received, and increase the prices required to be paid, by the Partnership for its portfolio sales and purchases. Where less than the maximum desired num

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
AGP LP 519 Alpha Group Capital Paul Barrett other manner which the General Partner determines is fair and equitable under the circumstances to all clients, including the Partnership. From the standpoint of the Partnership, simultaneous identical portfolio transactions for the Partnership and the other clients may tend to decrease the prices received, and increase the prices required to be paid, by the Partnership for its portfolio sales and purchases. Where less than the maximum desired number of shares of a particular security to be purchased is available at a favorable price, the shares purchased will be allocated among the Partnership and the other clients in an equitable manner as determined by the General Partner. In addition, purchase and sale transactions (including swaps) may be effected between the Partnership and other clients subject to the following guidelines: (i) such transactions shall be effected for cash consideration at the current market price of the particular securities, and (ii) no brokerage commission reallocation (except for customary transfer fees) or other remuneration shall be paid in connection with any such transaction. The Partnership bears its own expenses as described in Section 6 above. Each advisory client of the Investment Manager or its affiliates bears its own expenses as set forth in its respective investment management agreement or other governing document. Expenses borne by the other clients may differ from the expenses borne by the Partnership. In certain instances, the Partnership may bear expenses that the Investment Manager or its affiliates have agreed to bear for one or more of its other clients. In other instances, the other clients may bear expenses that the Investment Manager or its affiliates have agreed to bear for the Partnership. Where expenses are incurred on behalf of the Partnership and one or more other clients, the Investment Manager seeks to allocate those expenses among the Partnership and the other clients in a manner that is fair and reasonable over time. The Investment Manager may use a variety of methods to allocate such common expenses among the Partnership and the other clients, including methods based on assets under management, relative use of a product or service, the nature or source of a product or service, the relative benefits derived by the Partnership and the other clients from a product or service, or other relevant factors. It is possible that the Investment Manager will allocate an expense to the Partnership for a particular product or service that does not reflect the relative benefit derived by the Partnership from that product or service. As a result of the foregoing, the Affiliated Parties may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time and activity between the Partnership and other entities, in allocating investments among the Partnership and other entities and in effecting transactions for the Partnership and other entities, including ones in which the Affiliated Parties may have a greater financial interest. It may not always be possible or consistent with the investment objectives of the various persons or entities described above and of the Partnership for the same investment positions to be taken or liquidated at the same time or same price. Disaster, Business Continuity and Cyber-Security Risk The occurrence of a disaster such as a cyber-attack, a natural catastrophe, an industrial accident, a terrorist attack or war, events unanticipated in the Partnership, Master Fund or Investment Manager's disaster recovery systems, or a support failure from external providers, could have an adverse effect on the Partnership's ability to conduct business and on the Partnership's operations and financial condition, particularly if those events affect the Partnership's, Master Fund's or Investment Manager's computer-based data processing, transmission, storage, and retrieval systems, or if these events destroy data. If a significant number of the Investment Manager's employees were unavailable in the event of a disaster, the Partnership's ability to effectively conduct business could be severely compromised. The Investment Manager (and its affiliates) relies upon secure information technology systems for data processing, storage and reporting. Despite careful security and controls design, implementation and updating, the Investment Manager's (and its affiliates) information technology systems could become subject to cyber-attacks. Cyber-attacks include, but are not limited to, gaining unauthorized access to digital systems (e.g., through "hacking" or malicious software coding) for purposes of misappropriating assets or sensitive information, corrupting data, or causing operational disruption. Cyber-attacks may also be carried 22 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0087777 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00233961 EFTA01386194

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01437604

Subject: Re: discretionar ortfolio mgmt [I] From: Andrew King Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 13:00:24 -0400 To: Stewart Oldfield Cc: Nathaniel Morga William-M Finn Copying Nate and Bill On Oct 27, 2017, at 12:59 PM, Andrew King wrote: Hawkes Bay is not ready for distribution. We could send him Alkeon now. I've copied Nate and Bill who can submit the AIS request. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 27, 2017, at 9:52 AM, Stewart Oldfield c > wrote: > Did you ever send him our healthcare and tech man

5p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01392626

(3) Please provide evidence of or a case comment regarding confirmation from the client that the information on the KYC is still accurate (i.e. ownership structure, signatories, etc. have not changed). The comment must include the name of the person spoken with and date this conversation occurred. (The attached internal email does not meet this requirement.) — No material confirmation email was attached to the KYC but will not suffice as per AFC. They need evidence of client (person) & date

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01298930

KYC Print Page 1 of 27 DB PWM GLOBAL KYC/NCA: PART A P2 KYC Case # : 01977694 One sheet must be established per relationship - list all accounts included in the relationshi I. Relationship Details Relationship Name: SOUTHERN FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIP:00000483290 Booking Center: New York Relationship Manager: Stewart Oldfield Li New PWM Relationship [el Existing PWM Relationship Relationship to PWM: If existing, please indicate since when the relationship exists, provide reason for new

27p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01435772

Subject: RE: Pending responses on rejection cases under the SOUTHERN FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIP [I] From: Mayur Rathod < Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 10:34:22 -0400 To: Stewart Oldfield Cc: Richard Iarossi Bradley Gillin < Vinita Advan' Vijay-A Sawant Classification: For internal use only Hi Stew, We did get LPOA for Paul Barrett, but for other accounts. We have it now for J. Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation Inc. — highlighted in GREEN below. All the other rejection items are pending. Also,

7p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

11 MAY 25-MAY 27 901_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Irons, Janet Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11-29 AM To: Richard C. Smith Cc: Jeffrey T. We Subject: Meeting with Prison Society tomorrow Hello Warden Smith, I'm writing in preparation for our meeting with you and Director Hite tomorrow at 9:30 to talk about the Law Library. We have been in touch with Kim Kelmor, Assistant Director ofthe Law Library at Penn State, who has experience with prison libraries. She has helpfully provided us with some questions and guida

186p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01425707

Subject: Gratitude From: Stewart Oldfield dc > Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 12:07:18 -0400 To: Mayur Rathod Cc: Richard Iaross Bradley Gillin Vinita Advani Vijay-A Sawant Daphne Cales < Client hopes to have an answer on Gratitude by Nov. 15th. Thanks From: Stewart Oldfield To: Mayur Rathod Sent: Thursday, AM Cc: Richard Iarossi Vinita Advani ; Vijay-A Sawant Subject: RE: Pending responses on rejection cases under the SOUTHERN FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIP [I] Bradle No update on Gratitu

8p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.