Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01389296Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01389296

GLDUS133 Georgetown University Endowment Partnership Audit Legislation. Under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, legislation was enacted that significantly changes the rules for U.S. federal income tax audits of partnerships (the "BBA Rules"). Such audits will continue to be conducted at the partnership level, but with respect to U.S. federal income tax returns for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, and, unless a partnership qualifies for and affirmatively elects an alternativ

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01389296
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

GLDUS133 Georgetown University Endowment Partnership Audit Legislation. Under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, legislation was enacted that significantly changes the rules for U.S. federal income tax audits of partnerships (the "BBA Rules"). Such audits will continue to be conducted at the partnership level, but with respect to U.S. federal income tax returns for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, and, unless a partnership qualifies for and affirmatively elects an alternativ

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
GLDUS133 Georgetown University Endowment Partnership Audit Legislation. Under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, legislation was enacted that significantly changes the rules for U.S. federal income tax audits of partnerships (the "BBA Rules"). Such audits will continue to be conducted at the partnership level, but with respect to U.S. federal income tax returns for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, and, unless a partnership qualifies for and affirmatively elects an alternative procedure, any adjustments to the amount of tax due (including interest and penalties) will be payable by the partnership. Under the elective alternative procedure, a partnership would issue information returns to persons who were partners in the audited year, who would then be required to take the adjustments into account in calculating their own tax liability, and the partnership would not be liable for the adjustments. If the Access Fund does not or is not able to make such an election, then (I) the then current Partners of the Access Fund, in the aggregate, could indirectly bear income tax liabilities in excess of the aggregate amount of taxes that would have been due had the Access Fund elected the alternative procedure, and (2) a given Partner may indirectly bear taxes attributable to income allocable to other Partners or former Partners, including taxes (as well as interest and penalties) with respect to periods prior to such Partner's ownership of Interests. Amounts available for distribution to the Partners may be reduced as result of the Access Fund's obligations to pay any taxes associated with an adjustment. While we cannot provide any assurance, the General Partner generally intends to seek to ensure that the BBA Rules do not materially modify the current allocation of tax costs among Partners. Under the Partnership Agreement, current and former Partners may be required to indemnify the Access Fund for any tax costs that are allocable to them. In addition, if any taxes (including any interest and penalties) are borne directly by a "tax partnership" in which the Access Fund invests (directly or indirectly), the General Partner generally intends to appropriately allocate the burden of such taxes among thc Partners and any former Partners. We cannot provide assurance that the Access Fund will be eligible to make an election under the alternative procedure or that it will, in fact, make such an election for any given adjustment. Furthermore, the Underlying Fund must comply with the BBA Rules as well, and therefore the Limited Partners may indirectly suffer adverse consequences as a result. Many issues and the overall effect of the BBA Rules on the Access Fund and the Underlying Fund are uncertain, and prospective investors should consult their own tax advisors regarding all aspects of this legislation as it affects their particular circumstances. Other Tax Risks. An investment in the Access Fund involves complex U.S. federal, state and local and foreign income tax considerations that will differ for each Limited Partner. Prospective Limited Partners are advised to seek the advice of a qualified expert on matters of U.S. federal, state and local and foreign taxation of the Access Fund and ownership of the Interests. In judging whether to invest in the Access Fund, a prospective Limited Partner should consider the tax consequences thereof which include, but are not limited to: the possibility of adverse changes in applicable tax laws; the possibility that a Limited Partner may be required to file tax returns and pay tax in jurisdictions in which the Access Fund's Assets are deemed to be located and where the Access Fund is considered to be conducting business; the possibility that the Interests could decline in value with a Limited Partner realizing a capital loss if the Access Fund is liquidated or the Limited Partner disposes of its Interests, with limitations on the deductibility of any such capital loss; the possibility of substantial taxation of the Access Fund or Limited Partners, including imposition of state, local and foreign taxes (including withholding taxes), alternative minimum taxes and the net investment income tax; and Proprietary and Confidential 34 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0093651 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY GM_00239835 EFTA01389296

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01414378

81nidZpGqzkSDMpD This document is For Internal Use Only. Deutsche Bank Corporate & Investment Banking CONFIDENTIAL SPAC discussion materials August 2016 Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., a subsidiary of Deutsche Bank AG, conducts investment banking and securities activities in the United States. EFTA01414378 81nidZpOcizkSDMpD "IMPORTANT: This presentation (the "Presentation") has been prepared by Deutsche Bank's investment banking department exclusively for the benefit and internal us

143p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01387114

22 February 2018 Trucking U.S. Transportation Macroeconomic fluctuations often account for most of the risks associated with exposures to instruments that promise to pay fixed or variable interest rates. For an investor who is long fixed-rate instruments (thus receiving these cash flows), increases in interest rates naturally lift the discount factors applied to the expected cash flows and thus cause a loss. The longer the maturity of a certain cash flow and the higher the move in the disc

1p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01402237

NAME SEARCHED: Darren Indyke PWM BIS-RESEARCH performed due diligence research in accordance with the standards set by AML Compliance for your business We completed thorough searches on your subject name(s) in the required databases and have attached the search results under the correct heading below. Significant negative media results may require escalation to senior business, Legal and Compliance management. Also, all accounts involving PEPs must be escalated. Search: Result: RDC PC

79p
OtherUnknown

APPRAISAL REPORTS, INC.

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01305154

17p
OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 329 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2015 Page 1 of 2

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01325031

20p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.