Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01451032Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01451032

II December 2013 GEM Equity Strategy Outlook 2014 6) IT and industrials have moved in favour of DM which reflects favourable secular trends, most notably outsourcing from DM to EM companies and the growing importance of DM Intellectual capital. 'Figure 26: EM vs DM net margins (?`s)- Industrials 1.15C1 Indul/mib 1•84 maw 1M 11 12 1 10 8 4 24 0 4- 3 2 115C1 DM IndusUs 6 6 6 6 13 f t- 1 4 1 1 1 Sant Daces Bank Monty nn LP Figure 27: EM vs DM net margins (%) - Information

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01451032
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

II December 2013 GEM Equity Strategy Outlook 2014 6) IT and industrials have moved in favour of DM which reflects favourable secular trends, most notably outsourcing from DM to EM companies and the growing importance of DM Intellectual capital. 'Figure 26: EM vs DM net margins (?`s)- Industrials 1.15C1 Indul/mib 1•84 maw 1M 11 12 1 10 8 4 24 0 4- 3 2 115C1 DM IndusUs 6 6 6 6 13 f t- 1 4 1 1 1 Sant Daces Bank Monty nn LP Figure 27: EM vs DM net margins (%) - Information

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
II December 2013 GEM Equity Strategy Outlook 2014 6) IT and industrials have moved in favour of DM which reflects favourable secular trends, most notably outsourcing from DM to EM companies and the growing importance of DM Intellectual capital. 'Figure 26: EM vs DM net margins (?`s)- Industrials 1.15C1 Indul/mib 1•84 maw 1M 11 12 1 10 8 4 24 0 4- 3 2 115C1 DM IndusUs 6 6 6 6 13 f t- 1 4 1 1 1 Sant Daces Bank Monty nn LP Figure 27: EM vs DM net margins (%) - Information (Technology Nei margin O41 18 - 18 14 - 12 10 2 0 a alommeon Technakgy -1192 DM • 11110110036 TOON1010gy S. S :e- San' Oars eBan. Ikombn 1P 7) EMs have fared especially badly in energy and materials primarily due to the impact of policies based on state capitalism and resource nationalism, which have reduced returns to capital. [Figure 28: EM vs DM net margins (%) - Materials [Figure 29: EM vs DM net margins (%) - Energy 2 I.415DIEM • MMersals ••••••-•M13O DM • Melenals Net Myr DM 25 20 is 10 5 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i San.. Onlacin an Skombeep Area LP Ma Mow(%) 18 16 1 EM - EnM/Iff 0 1 4 6 6 4 S. 2 2 2 2 2 2 Saar Purse. Os* O'congtorp Mance LP 444-MSCI DM - EMMY 2 k 2 Conclusion; valuation now ambivalent, but the secular decline of EM profitability relative to DM is likely to continue across most sectors. Whilst the secular strengths of the US model are increasingly factored into valuations (Figure 30 and Figure 31), there is no obvious end to the likely degradation of margins of EM companies in the regulated and resource sectors, relative to their DM peers. Continued DM outperformance in Industrials and IT is also highly likely in our view, given the ongoing secular trends, whilst EM staples stocks appear very expensive relative to their DM counterparts based on their respective return profiles. Financials are a much more difficult call, but given our negative structural view on China, we believe that investors are right to price in a very substantial impairment of assets in China, Brazil and Russia, while India is also problematic. The DM financials sector is still under pressure from increasingly burdensome regulation and litigation relating to the financial crisis, but would appear to be at a better position in the economic cycle than most GEM economies. Page 16 Deutsche Bank AG/London CONFIDENTIAL — PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0107150 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00253334 EFTA01451032

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.