Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01452585Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01452585

28 January 2014 Brokers, Asset Managers & Exchanges Alternative Asset Manager Initiation Figures 18 and 19 compare our estimates vs. Consensus, with Figure 18 shown on an ENI per unit basis, and Figure 19 shown on a distribution per unit basis (comparable to dividend per share forecasts, as Consensus DE forecasts are not readily available with a sizeable population). The Figures show our estimates for ENI are generally below Consensus, while our distribution forecasts are generally above

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01452585
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

28 January 2014 Brokers, Asset Managers & Exchanges Alternative Asset Manager Initiation Figures 18 and 19 compare our estimates vs. Consensus, with Figure 18 shown on an ENI per unit basis, and Figure 19 shown on a distribution per unit basis (comparable to dividend per share forecasts, as Consensus DE forecasts are not readily available with a sizeable population). The Figures show our estimates for ENI are generally below Consensus, while our distribution forecasts are generally above

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
28 January 2014 Brokers, Asset Managers & Exchanges Alternative Asset Manager Initiation Figures 18 and 19 compare our estimates vs. Consensus, with Figure 18 shown on an ENI per unit basis, and Figure 19 shown on a distribution per unit basis (comparable to dividend per share forecasts, as Consensus DE forecasts are not readily available with a sizeable population). The Figures show our estimates for ENI are generally below Consensus, while our distribution forecasts are generally above Consensus. This above-Consensus view on distributions forms our more optimistic view on the Alt space - to the extent we are correct, and we think upside surprises in distributable earnings over the coming quarters will be a positive catalyst for valuation improvement. [Figure IS: DB Forecasts for ENI per unit for the Alts vs. Consensus 400Y2013 2014 2016 Alts DB Cons. %diff DB Cons. %diff APO $0.82 $0.80 1.9% $2.50 53.04 -17.7% BX 30.84 5082 2.3% $3.09 $2.98 3.7% CG $0.93 $0.87 6.8% $2.70 33.17 -14.8% KKR $0.96 $0.89 8.4% 52.33 $2.52 -7.5% OAK 31.19 $1.15 3.6% $4.36 $4.80 -9.2% Median 3.6% -9.2% Sono Thomson Aaron &be O*.eselx Ban 'Figure 19: DB Forecasts for Distribution per unit for the Alts vs. Consensus 40CY2013 2014 Alts DB Cons. %diff C8 Cons. %diff APO $0.80 30.79 1.4% 33.06 $2.48 23.3% BX $0.47 50.45 3.7% $1.95 $1.78 9.3% CG $1.20 $1.17 2.8% $2.22 $2.03 9.3% KKR $0.39 30.39 -0.5% 31.58 $1.44 10.0% OAK $0.91 50.92 -0.8% $3.78 $3.75 0.9% Median 1.4% 9.3% Saga ?Mown Arian neewtm Sort Our valuation methodology While valuation methodologies using sum of the parts or DCF models can be intellectually rigorous, we think a more simplified PIE approach on distributable earnings (DE) will end up being a better indicator of the Ails' unit price performance over time. Our approach works in the following steps: Observe each of the Alts forward P/E on Consensus (ENI) over the past 12 months and last two years and compare to the S&P 500 to derive a relative PIE; Assess to what extent each Alts' relative PIE will improve or worsen (or stay the same) over the next 12 months vs. the prior I2-months, based on the variety of fundamental factors outlined in this report; Derive a target forward P/E for the S&P 500 12 months from now, which is 14.9x (based on DB equity strategy forecast for S&P 2015 EPS of $125 and S&P ending prices of 1850 yearend 2014 and 2000 yearend 2015. which implies 1863 12-months from this report); Multiply our target relative PIE to derive a target absolute PIE; Apply this absolute P/E on our 2015 DE forecasts to derive where the units will trade on 1-year forward distributable earnings 12-months from now; hence where the units will trade on 2015 DE in Jan-2015. DB Cons. %diff $2.32 $3.08 -24.8% 53.24 $3.42 -5.4% $2.89 $3.41 -15.2% $2.33 $2.77 -15.8% $4.67 $4.83 -3.4% .15.2% 2016 DB Cons. %diff $2.56 $2.13 20.3% $2.46 $2.00 22.8% $2.70 $2.35 15.1% 51.76 $1.43 23.1% $3.98 $3.79 5.1% 20.3% Page 20 Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0109706 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00255890 EFTA01452585

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01380087

Eligible Interest Rate Tiers The eligible interest rate tiers with respect to your funds in IDP are as follows: Household Market Value Up to $1 million More than $1 million up to and including $10 million More than $10 million You may obtain a current list of interest rates with respect to the IDI3 for each interest rate tier by accessing the information at http://deutschewealth.com/americasien/CashSweepOptionehtrnl and clicking on "Cash Sweep Options—Rates" or by contacting your Relatio

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01280939

FIFTH THIRD BANK Statement Period Date: 1/1/2015 - 1/31/2015 Account Type: 5/3 Bus Standard Ckg Account Number: (SOUTH FLORIDA) P.O. MIX 6311900 CINCINNATI OH 4526341900 SCIO VERUM CORPORATION 27 HIGH TECH BLVD THOMASVILLE NC 27360-5560 0 457 Relationship Manager Name: Helene Toll:wino Phone: Business Banking Support: Account Summary - 01/01 Beginning Balance $26,845.34 Number of Days in Period 31 Checks 5 Withdrawals / Debits $(58.312.95) 4 Deposits / Credits $80,143.64

2p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01370828

rdc DB12000P - Deutsche Bank Private Bank Alert Batch Date: Added to Monitoring: 05/30/2018 5/30/2018 Alert Date: 5/30/2018 Person Name: Jeffrey Edward Epstein Address: Count,: VIRGIN ISLANDS, U.S. Tracking ID: KYC 01946825 Date of Birth: 01/20/1953 Reporting ID: Alerted Entity # 1 of 1 Risk Priority: Critical Alert ID: 13917575.11632106.83945295 • The Palm Beach Post, http://global.factiva.conVen/du/articleasp?NAPC=S8AccessionNo=PMBP000020060726e27o0000i • New York - Divisi

1p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
OtherUnknown

Statement Period Date: 12/1/2016 - 12/31/2016

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01280416

2p
OtherUnknown

KYC Print

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01299082

15p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.