Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01480869Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01480869

Confidential Due Diligence Report UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA (West Palm Beach) Doe No 101 v. Epstein PLAINTIFF: Jane Doe No 101 DEFENDANT: Epstein, Jeffrey AMICUS: United States of America DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:09cv80591 LEAD DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:08-cv-80119-K FILING DATE: 4/17/2009 JURISDICTION: Federal Question JUDGE: Marra, Kenneth A REFERRED TO: Magistrate Judge Johnson, Linnea R NATURE OF SUIT: 360 Personal Injury FILING TYPE: Civil CAUSE: Fed

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01480869
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Confidential Due Diligence Report UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA (West Palm Beach) Doe No 101 v. Epstein PLAINTIFF: Jane Doe No 101 DEFENDANT: Epstein, Jeffrey AMICUS: United States of America DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:09cv80591 LEAD DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:08-cv-80119-K FILING DATE: 4/17/2009 JURISDICTION: Federal Question JUDGE: Marra, Kenneth A REFERRED TO: Magistrate Judge Johnson, Linnea R NATURE OF SUIT: 360 Personal Injury FILING TYPE: Civil CAUSE: Fed

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Confidential Due Diligence Report UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA (West Palm Beach) Doe No 101 v. Epstein PLAINTIFF: Jane Doe No 101 DEFENDANT: Epstein, Jeffrey AMICUS: United States of America DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:09cv80591 LEAD DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:08-cv-80119-K FILING DATE: 4/17/2009 JURISDICTION: Federal Question JUDGE: Marra, Kenneth A REFERRED TO: Magistrate Judge Johnson, Linnea R NATURE OF SUIT: 360 Personal Injury FILING TYPE: Civil CAUSE: Fed. Question: Personal Injury28 USC 1331 JURY DEMAND: Plaintiff STATUS: Case Closed PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY(S): Ezell, Katherine Warthen ICOR LD NTCJ Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg Et Al City National Bank Building 25 W Flagler Street Suite 800 Miami, FL, USA 33130-1780 Email: Josefsberg, Robert C [COR LD NTC] Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg Et Al City National Bank Building 25 W Flagler Street Suite 800 Miami, FL, USA 33130-1780 Email: DEFENDANT ATTORNEY(S): Pike, Michael James [COR LD NTCJ Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 West Palm Beach. FL. USA 33401-2918 Email: Robert Deweese Critton, Jr ICOR LO NTC] Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL, USA 33401-2918 Email: Lefkowitz, Jay P (COR LD NTCJ Kirkland & Ellis 655 15TH Street NW Suite 1200 Washin ton. DC. USA 20005 Email: Shumsky, Michael D [COR LD NTC] Kirkland & Ellis Confidential - This report is not to be disseminated or photocopied to any third party without the express consent of Global Security az Investigations. 104749084A 22 Confidential Treatment Requested by JPMorgan Chase CONFIDENTIAL JPM-SDNY-00003103 SDNY_GM_00272301 EFTA01480869

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80119-K
Case #9:09CV80591
Phone401-2918

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

6p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

9p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Du..ument 511 Entered on FLSD Docku, J3/29/2010 Page 1 of 11

11p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.