Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-15969House OversightFinancial Record

Science reporter alleges Lawrence Krauss received $100K from Jeffrey Epstein and defended him despite abuse allegations

The passage links a high-profile scientist and public intellectual to Jeffrey Epstein’s funding and suggests possible complicity or defense of a convicted sex offender. It provides specific amounts, d Krauss received a $100,000 pledge from Epstein’s private foundation in 2014 for the Origins Project. Krauss publicly defended Epstein in interviews and blog comments despite Epstein’s 2008 conviction

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #031276
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage links a high-profile scientist and public intellectual to Jeffrey Epstein’s funding and suggests possible complicity or defense of a convicted sex offender. It provides specific amounts, d Krauss received a $100,000 pledge from Epstein’s private foundation in 2014 for the Origins Project. Krauss publicly defended Epstein in interviews and blog comments despite Epstein’s 2008 conviction

Tags

jeffrey-epsteinfinancial-flowpublic-statementsforeign-influencescience-fundingacademic-ethicslegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightsexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
° At CSICon in Las Vegas in October, a few dozen fans paid $500 per head to attend a VIP luncheon with you and Dawkins. ° Many more lined up to get you to sign their copy of your latest book, The Greatest Story Ever Told — So Far. ° Online, people can buy T-shirts emblazoned “Lawrence Krauss for President.” ° In talks and interviews, you have argued that our universe arose without divine intervention, that religion drives xenophobia, and that our brains are hardwired to believe. ° You have stated that science provides answers to many of life’s biggest questions, and can even fix great societal injustices. ° Earlier this year, at a Q&A event to promote your new book, the conversation came around to the dearth of women and minorities in science. “Science itself overcomes misogyny and prejudice and bias,” you said. “It’s built in: Questioning yourself, always questioning results, questioning others, relying on empirical evidence.” ° You have clashed with some skeptics over your defense of Jeffrey Epstein, a billionaire financier who in 2008 was convicted for soliciting prostitution from underage girls, and spent 13 months in a Florida jail. ° Through his private foundation, Epstein has funded the work of several prominent scientists. He has provided funding for your Origins Project, supporting lectureship and scholarship programs, most recently pledging $100,000 in 2014. ° In April 2011, you told the Daily Beast: “As a scientist | always judge things on empirical evidence and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I’ve never seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were | would believe him over other people.” ° In a blog comment about the Epstein controversy, you wrote: “I remain skeptical, and | support a man whose character | believe I know...If you want to condemn me for that, so be it.” ° You were made an honorary member of CFI’s board of directors in December 2011. ° A blog post published in August 2013 described incidents #1 and #4, naming you. Another post, published at around the same time, described incident #5. ° The first post was edited to remove your name after you had commented that the allegations of assault were “potentially illegal.” The second post was quickly taken down. Again, if you wish to comment on or clarify any of these points, please get in touch with us as soon as possible. If |do not respond immediately it is because | am on another call, so please leave the best phone number to reach you. Thanks, Peter Aldhous Peter Aldhous, PhD Science reporter | BuzzFeed News tc] Ei” cell: @paldhous www.peteraldhous.com Lawrence M. Krauss Director, The Origins Project at ASU

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.peteraldhous.com

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

Lawrence Krauss sexual misconduct allegations and Epstein funding disclosed in BuzzFeed inquiry

Lawrence Krauss sexual misconduct allegations and Epstein funding disclosed in BuzzFeed inquiry The passage provides a detailed chronology of multiple alleged sexual assaults spanning a decade, cites specific university investigations and internal communications, notes a denial of document requests, and reveals a $100,000 donation from Jeffrey Epstein to Krauss's research. If verified, these facts would implicate a high‑profile scientist, several major universities, and a notorious financier, creating a major scandal and actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Six distinct alleged incidents (2006‑2016) involving Krausss alleged sexual advances or assault, with dates, locations, and victim descriptions.; University investigations at Case Western Reserve, Arizona State University (ASU), and Australian National University (ANU) concluded no policy violation, but internal letters (e.g., Susan Nickel‑Schindewolf) document the process.; ASU denied BuzzFeed’s request for records related to the complaints, citing confidentiality, indicating possible document suppression.

1p
House OversightUnknown

BuzzFeed investigation of multiple sexual misconduct allegations against physicist Lawrence Krauss, involving ASU, ANU, Case Western and alleged ties to Jeffrey Epstein funding

BuzzFeed investigation of multiple sexual misconduct allegations against physicist Lawrence Krauss, involving ASU, ANU, Case Western and alleged ties to Jeffrey Epstein funding The passage contains a detailed list of six alleged incidents, references formal complaints, university investigations, and a pending BuzzFeed story. It names high‑profile institutions (Arizona State University, Australian National University, Case Western Reserve, Center for Inquiry) and mentions Krauss’s connection to Jeffrey Epstein’s foundation, which could be a financial‑flow lead. While many details are already public, the document reveals internal communications, specific dates, and the existence of undisclosed evidence that investigators could pursue, making it a strong, actionable lead but not a completely novel blockbuster. Key insights: Six specific alleged sexual misconduct incidents spanning 2006‑2016, with dates and contexts.; University investigations at ASU, ANU, and Case Western concluded no credible evidence, but internal memos and letters are referenced.; BuzzFeed journalists (Peter Aldhous, Azeen Ghorayshi, Virginia Hughes) are preparing a story and seeking Krauss’s response.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

BuzzFeed News investigation into multiple sexual misconduct allegations against physicist Lawrence Krauss

The document contains detailed allegations spanning a decade, specific incidents, dates, university investigations, and mentions of high‑profile institutions (ASU, ANU, Case Western, Center for Inquir Six distinct alleged incidents (2006‑2016) involving alleged sexual assault or harassment. University investigations at Case Western, Arizona State, and Australian National University conclud BuzzFee

14p
House OversightUnknown

BuzzFeed investigation and Lawrence Krauss' response to multiple sexual misconduct allegations (2006‑2016)

BuzzFeed investigation and Lawrence Krauss' response to multiple sexual misconduct allegations (2006‑2016) The document provides a detailed chronology of alleged incidents, university investigations, and Krauss' own rebuttal, offering concrete dates, institutions, and specific complaints that could be followed up for verification. While the allegations are already public, the email chain contains references to internal university communications and investigative outcomes that are not widely reported, making it a moderate‑value lead for further fact‑checking and potential exposure of institutional handling. Key insights: Six specific alleged incidents spanning 2006‑2016 with dates, locations, and parties named.; University investigations at Case Western, Arizona State University, and Australian National University referenced, with outcomes described as “unsubstantiated”.; BuzzFeed reporter Peter Aldhous seeks Krauss’ evidence for claims that universities concluded the reports were fabricated.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Science reporter alleges Lawrence Krauss received $100K from Jeffrey Epstein and defended him despite abuse allegations

Science reporter alleges Lawrence Krauss received $100K from Jeffrey Epstein and defended him despite abuse allegations The passage links a high-profile scientist and public intellectual to Jeffrey Epstein’s funding and suggests possible complicity or defense of a convicted sex offender. It provides specific amounts, dates, and quotes that could be pursued for financial records and interview follow‑up, but the claims are largely anecdotal and lack direct documentary evidence, limiting immediate impact. Key insights: Krauss received a $100,000 pledge from Epstein’s private foundation in 2014 for the Origins Project.; Krauss publicly defended Epstein in interviews and blog comments despite Epstein’s 2008 conviction.; BuzzFeed reporter Peter Aldhous references blog posts alleging assault incidents involving Krauss.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

BuzzFeed investigation of multiple sexual misconduct allegations against physicist Lawrence Krauss, involving ASU, ANU, Case Western and alleged ti...

The passage contains a detailed list of six alleged incidents, references formal complaints, university investigations, and a pending BuzzFeed story. It names high‑profile institutions (Arizona State Six specific alleged sexual misconduct incidents spanning 2006‑2016, with dates and contexts. University investigations at ASU, ANU, and Case Western concluded no credible evidence, but internal Buzz

18p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.