1 duplicate copy in the archive
Attorney Appearance Sheet for House Oversight Case (Jan 25, 2016)
The document only lists counsel (Jack A. Goldberger, Lilly Ann Sanchez) and their firms for a House Oversight case, without any substantive allegations, transactions, or connections to powerful actors Filing dated 01/25/2016 for a House Oversight matter. Counsel includes Jack A. Goldberger of Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss. Additional attorney listed: Lilly Ann Sanchez of Fowler White.
Summary
The document only lists counsel (Jack A. Goldberger, Lilly Ann Sanchez) and their firms for a House Oversight case, without any substantive allegations, transactions, or connections to powerful actors Filing dated 01/25/2016 for a House Oversight matter. Counsel includes Jack A. Goldberger of Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss. Additional attorney listed: Lilly Ann Sanchez of Fowler White.
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
1
561.659.8300Related Documents (6)
Attorney Bradley Edwards alleges Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement, 5th Amendment tactics, and a unique George Rush tape as key evidence ...
The affidavit details a non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Epstein from federal charges, claims that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment to block discovery, and describes a purportedly Epstein secured a federal non‑prosecution agreement that barred criminal charges for ~30 victims in All co‑defendants and Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, leaving plaintiffs with no substantive
Extensive court filing outlines alleged Jeffrey Epstein abuse network, non‑prosecution deal, and potential ties to high‑profile figures (Clinton, T...
The document provides a dense compilation of alleged facts, emails, deposition excerpts, and discovery requests that link Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual‑abuse operation to a “pyramid” recruitment scheme, a Epstein allegedly ran a “pyramid” scheme paying underage victims $200‑$300 per recruited girl. A 2007 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with the U.S. Attorney’s Office allegedly shielded Epstein fr Ema
Attorney Service List for House Oversight Document
Attorney Service List for House Oversight Document The passage only provides a list of attorneys and their firms with contact information. It contains no substantive allegations, transactions, dates, or connections to influential actors, making it noise with no investigative value. Key insights: Names of several attorneys (e.g., Christopher E. Knight, Joseph L. Ackerman, Jack Alan Goldberger, Marc S. Nurik, Gary M. Farmer, Jr.); Associated law firms and addresses in Florida
Epstein deposition excerpt cited in Florida civil case alleging child sexual abuse
Epstein deposition excerpt cited in Florida civil case alleging child sexual abuse The passage merely references a prior deposition where Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, offering no new names, transactions, or actionable details beyond what is already public. It confirms existing allegations but provides no novel leads for investigation. Key insights: Cites Epstein's deposition on March 17, 2010; Notes Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about sexual preferences; Mentions adverse inference doctrine in civil procedure
PLEA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01306347
NY Post seeks to unseal sealed appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal, exposing DA and prosecutor conduct
NY Post seeks to unseal sealed appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal, exposing DA and prosecutor conduct The filing reveals a concrete dispute over sealed court documents that could shed light on why the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and Florida prosecutors allegedly gave Jeffrey Epstein preferential treatment. It names high‑profile officials (Cyrus Vance Jr., Alexander Acosta, Danny Frost) and outlines specific communications, dates, and procedural steps that investigators could follow to obtain the briefs and probe possible misconduct. Key insights: NY Post filed a motion (Dec 21, 2018) to unseal appellate briefs in Epstein’s SORA appeal, requesting victim‑redacted copies.; Manhattan DA’s office (Danny Frost, Karen Friedman‑Agnifilo) initially opposed unsealing, citing Civil Rights Law § 50‑b and alleged lack of notice to Florida prosecutors.; Post withdrew the motion (Jan 4, 2019) to avoid procedural disputes, then refiled after notifying Florida prosecutors (Palm Beach State Attorney and U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Florida).
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.