Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-1863House OversightLegal Filing

The letter, written by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, argues that [REDACTED - Survivor] ...

The letter, written by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, argues that [REDACTED - Survivor] and [REDACTED - Survivor] do not qualify as 'crime victims' under the CVRA because their alleged victimization occurred after the conduct underlying the offenses charged against Maxwell ended in 2004. The letter requests that the court clarify who will be permitted to speak at the sentencing proceeding.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1863
Pages
1
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The letter, written by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, argues that [REDACTED - Survivor] and [REDACTED - Survivor] do not qualify as 'crime victims' under the CVRA because their alleged victimization occurred after the conduct underlying the offenses charged against Maxwell ended in 2004. The letter requests that the court clarify who will be permitted to speak at the sentencing proceeding.

Tags

Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA)Victim Impact StatementsSentencing Proceeding
0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeCorrespondenceUnknown

Letter to the Court: doj-ogr-00010725

This letter, written by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, opposes the motion by [REDACTED - Survivor] and [REDACTED - Survivor] to give oral victim impact statements during Maxwell's sentencing, arguing they are not statutory crime victims under the CVRA.

1p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 667

The letter, written by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, argues that [REDACTED - Survivor] and [REDACTED - Survivor] do not qualify as 'crime victims' under the CVRA because their alleged victimization occurred after the conduct underlying the offenses charged against Maxwell ended in 2004. The letter requests that the court clarify who will be permitted to speak at the sentencing proceeding.

2p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 133

Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team files a motion to suppress evidence obtained from a government subpoena and to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the indictment, citing the Due Process Clause. The motion is supported by a memorandum of law and exhibits. The defense attorneys representing Maxwell are listed, along with their contact information.

2p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01407289

NAME SEARCHED: Harry Beller PWM BIS-RESEARCH performed due diligence research in accordance with the standards set by AML Compliance for your business We completed thorough searches on your subject name(s) in the required databases and have attached the search results under the correct heading below. Significant negative media results may require escalation to senior business, Legal and Compliance management. Also, all accounts involving PEPs must be escalated. Search: Result: RDC PCR

58p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00019897

0p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 407

The document is a court filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel requesting the release of potential jurors' names to attorneys, citing concerns about the ability to conduct background research and ensure a fair trial. The filing references relevant case law and bar association opinions to support the request.

5p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.