Skip to main content
Skip to content
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Case File
d-26826House Oversight

Court filing challenges admissibility of hearsay in Maxwell-related case

Other

The passage discusses procedural arguments about hearsay rules and mentions Ms. Maxwell, but provides no concrete new information about powerful actors, financial flows, or misconduct. It lacks specif Argument that police records lack a business duty and are inadmissible as business records. Reference to Ms. Maxwell’s alleged involvement in teenage prostitution. Citation of multiple court decision

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011422
Pages
1
Persons
11
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.