Skip to main content
Skip to content
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Case File
d-28853House OversightOther

Attorney Bradley J. Edwards Affirms Good Faith in Epstein-Related Prosecutions

The passage provides a self‑serving affidavit by a lawyer involved in Jeffrey Epstein matters, confirming dismissal of a Florida Bar complaint and asserting good‑faith actions. It offers no new factua Bradley J. Edwards filed an affidavit stating his actions in Epstein prosecutions were in good faith Epstein filed a complaint against Edwards with the Florida Bar, which was later dismissed. Edwards

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #013474
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage provides a self‑serving affidavit by a lawyer involved in Jeffrey Epstein matters, confirming dismissal of a Florida Bar complaint and asserting good‑faith actions. It offers no new factua Bradley J. Edwards filed an affidavit stating his actions in Epstein prosecutions were in good faith Epstein filed a complaint against Edwards with the Florida Bar, which was later dismissed. Edwards

Tags

jeffrey-epsteincourt-documentsaffidavitlegal-ethicsflorida-barlegal-exposurehouse-oversightprofessional-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
23. 24. 25. subsequent developments in his prosecution. A copy of this letter is attached to this Affidavit. (A copy of the letter is attached to Statement of Undisputed Facts as Exhibit UU) Jeffrey Epstein also filed a complaint with the Florida Bar against me. His complaint alleged that I had been involved in Rothstein’s scheme and had thereby violated various rules of professional responsibility. The Florida Bar investigated and dismissed the complaint. I have reviewed the Statement of Undisputed Facts filed contemporaneously with this Affidavit. Each of the assertions concerning what I learned, what I did, and the good faith beliefs formed by me in the course of my prosecutions of claims against Jeffrey Epstein as contained in the Statement of Undisputed Facts is true, and the foundations set out as support for my beliefs are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. All actions taken by me in the course of my prosecution of claims against Jeffrey Epstein were based upon a good faith belief that they were reasonable, necessary, and ethically proper to fulfill my obligation to zealously represent the interests of my clients. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: ui 21 2010 Bradley J. Edwards, Esq.

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

Email scheduling deposition of Jean Luc Bruhnel in Epstein matter

Email scheduling deposition of Jean Luc Bruhnel in Epstein matter The document is a routine internal law firm email confirming a deposition date. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑level officials. As such it offers no actionable investigative lead. Key insights: Deposition of Jean Luc Bruhnel scheduled for 11/3/2009 at 10:00 a.m.; Sent by Jacquie Johnson, legal assistant at Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler; Recipient appears to be a lawyer at Tiudal Law

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Epstein deposition excerpt cited in Florida civil case alleging child sexual abuse

The passage merely references a prior deposition where Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, offering no new names, transactions, or actionable details beyond what is already public. It confirms existi Cites Epstein's deposition on March 17, 2010 Notes Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about sexual preferences Mentions adverse inference doctrine in civil procedure

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Bradley J. Edwards files renewed motion for summary judgment in Jeffrey Epstein civil case

The passage merely restates a routine procedural filing without revealing new evidence, financial flows, or connections to high‑level officials. It offers minimal investigative value beyond confirming Edwards seeks summary judgment, claiming no genuine issue of material fact. Alleges no evidence of fraud by Edwards against Epstein. References three alleged victims of Epstein linked to Edwards.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Extensive RRA Contact List Linking Donald Trump's Attorney and Multiple Epstein‑Case Lawyers

The document provides a detailed roster of attorneys, paralegals, investigators, and staff associated with the RRA (presumably a law firm or litigation consortium) handling Jeffrey Epstein‑related mat Alan Garten is identified as "Donald Trump's attorney" within the RRA contact list. Multiple attorneys are listed as "Counsel for other Epstein Victims," indicating a broader litigatio The list inclu

2p
House OversightUnknown

Epstein invokes Fifth Amendment in deposition about alleged scheme involving victim‑lawyer Bradley Edwards and Scott Rothstein fraud

Epstein invokes Fifth Amendment in deposition about alleged scheme involving victim‑lawyer Bradley Edwards and Scott Rothstein fraud The passage links Jeffrey Epstein to a potential coordinated effort with Scott Rothstein’s Ponzi scheme and a victim‑lawyer, Bradley Edwards. It provides specific dates, deposition transcripts, and a victim‑notification letter, offering concrete leads for follow‑up (e.g., request the full deposition, the U.S. Attorney’s letter, and any related Florida Bar filings). While the allegations are unverified, they involve high‑profile figures and could expose a broader network of financial misconduct, meriting a strong investigative value but not yet a blockbuster revelation. Key insights: July 20, 2010 letter from U.S. Attorney’s Office labeling Edwards a victim of Rothstein’s fraud; Jeffrey Epstein filed a complaint with the Florida Bar accusing Edwards of wrongdoing in the Rothstein case; the complaint was dismissed; Epstein’s March 17, 2010 deposition shows he repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about his lawsuit against Edwards

1p
House OversightUnknown

Jeffrey Epstein deposition excerpt cited in Florida civil case alleging sexual abuse of children

Jeffrey Epstein deposition excerpt cited in Florida civil case alleging sexual abuse of children The passage provides a concrete deposition reference (Mar. 17, 2010) where Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, supporting a claim of sexual abuse. It offers a specific legal document and date that can be followed up, but it does not introduce new actors, financial flows, or novel allegations beyond already public knowledge of Epstein’s misconduct. Key insights: Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein dated March 17, 2010 is referenced (Exhibit #1).; Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment right when questioned about sexual abuse of children.; The document is part of a civil case filed in the 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.