Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-29040House OversightFinancial Record

Sealed Exhibit List References Jeffrey Epstein Depositions and Nude Photographs in House Oversight Filing

The document merely enumerates sealed exhibits—including Epstein deposition excerpts, a banking account, and nude photographs—without providing substantive details, names of other actors, dates of tra Exhibit list references multiple depositions of Jeffrey Epstein (2010, 2016). Includes a banking account record (GIUFFRE007840). Mentions sealed nude photographs as an exhibit.

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #014119
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document merely enumerates sealed exhibits—including Epstein deposition excerpts, a banking account, and nude photographs—without providing substantive details, names of other actors, dates of tra Exhibit list references multiple depositions of Jeffrey Epstein (2010, 2016). Includes a banking account record (GIUFFRE007840). Mentions sealed nude photographs as an exhibit.

Tags

jeffrey-epsteinpotential-sexual-misconductfinancial-flowsealed-exhibitsbanking-recordslegal-exposurehouse-oversightsexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Maxwell Phone List. 7. Attached hereto as Sealed Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of Excerpts from June 28, 2016 Deposition of Tony Figuerora. 8. Attached hereto as Sealed Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of Excerpts from May 18, 2016 Deposition a. a. Attached hereto as Sealed Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of Jeffrey Epstein’s DDA Statement History. 10. Attached hereto as Sealed Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of a Household Banking Account (GIUFFRE007840). Th. Attached hereto as Sealed Exhibit 9 is a true and correct copy of Nude Photographs. DD. Attached hereto as Sealed Exhibit 10 is a true and correct copy of Excerpts from June 20, 2016 Deposition of KR 13. Attached hereto Sealed Exhibit 11 is a true and correct copy Excerpts from March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Sigrid am Esq. Dated: October 21, 2016. Respectfully Submitted, BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP

Related Documents (6)

House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] seeks limited court‑ordered release of her confidential deposition to law‑enforcement, implicating Bill Clinton, Jeffrey Epstein a...

The filing outlines a concrete request to disclose a victim’s confidential deposition to federal and state prosecutors, explicitly linking former President Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein to alleged Giuffre’s deposition (Jan 16 2016) is sealed but could be shared with U.S. and state attorneys. Dershowitz alleges perjury over Giuffre’s claim that Clinton was on Epstein’s USVI island. The motion r

4p
House OversightUnknown

Sealed Declaration in Giuffre v. Epstein Motion to Compel Production of Epstein’s Phone Records, Contact List, and Message Pads

Sealed Declaration in Giuffre v. Epstein Motion to Compel Production of Epstein’s Phone Records, Contact List, and Message Pads The filing reveals a court‑ordered request for Epstein’s sealed phone records, contact list, and message pad excerpts, which could contain undisclosed connections to powerful individuals. While the case is already public, the specific documents sought are not, offering a concrete investigative avenue. The lead is moderately controversial and potentially high‑impact if the records expose further elite networks, but it does not yet name top‑level officials directly. Key insights: Plaintiff [REDACTED - Survivor] seeks a court order compelling Jeffrey Epstein to produce phone records, a contact list, and message pad excerpts.; The documents are filed as sealed exhibits, indicating they may contain undisclosed information.; Exhibit 4 references Ghislaine (likely Ghislaine Maxwell), suggesting her involvement in the communications.

1p
House OversightMay 25, 2017

Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell – Oral Argument Docket (Southern District of New York, March 31, 2017)

Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell – Oral Argument Docket (Southern District of New York, March 31, 2017) The document is a routine court docket listing parties, counsel, and judge for an oral argument. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to powerful actors beyond the already public parties. As such, it offers no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Case number: 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS); Judge: Hon. Robert W. Sweet; Plaintiff: Virginia L. Giuffre

1p
House OversightUnknown

Sealed Exhibit List References Jeffrey Epstein Depositions and Nude Photographs in House Oversight Filing

Sealed Exhibit List References Jeffrey Epstein Depositions and Nude Photographs in House Oversight Filing The document merely enumerates sealed exhibits—including Epstein deposition excerpts, a banking account, and nude photographs—without providing substantive details, names of other actors, dates of transactions, or clear allegations. While the mention of Epstein and a House Oversight context hints at possible investigative avenues, the lack of concrete information limits immediate follow‑up value. Key insights: Exhibit list references multiple depositions of Jeffrey Epstein (2010, 2016).; Includes a banking account record (GIUFFRE007840).; Mentions sealed nude photographs as an exhibit.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Court Transcript Reveals Potential Undisclosed Evidence and High‑Profile Connections in Giuffre v. Maxwell Defamation Case

The transcript contains several concrete references that could be pursued for investigative value: attempts to depose former President Bill Clinton; FOIA requests and alleged FBI involvement (Louie Fr Plaintiff’s counsel sought to depose Bill Clinton to establish his relationship with Epstein. Reference to former FBI Director Louis Freeh as an expert witness without a Rule 26 disclosure. Discussio

138p
House OversightNov 23, 2015

Plaintiffs seek to unseal court filings alleging sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in [REDACTED - Survivor] defamation case

Plaintiffs seek to unseal court filings alleging sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in [REDACTED - Survivor] defamation case The passage reveals a motion to keep certain filings confidential that contain allegations of sexual abuse by a high‑profile attorney, Alan Dershowitz, on behalf of [REDACTED - Survivor]. While it identifies a potential lead—unsealing these records could provide evidence of misconduct—it lacks concrete details such as dates of alleged abuse, financial transactions, or direct links to powerful political figures. The controversy is moderate, and the novelty is limited given the public nature of the Dershowitz‑Giuffre allegations. Key insights: Defendants Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell filed a response to Dershowitz’s motion to keep records confidential.; The contested records are three filings that recount [REDACTED - Survivor]’s allegations of sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz.; Plaintiffs argue the filings are not confidential and should be part of the public record in the defamation case.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.