Allegation of Girls Using Agreement to Obtain Money Then Void ItFor a full overview of investment performance, please refer to Section II: Summary of
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Critique of Ex Parte Subpoenas and Proposed Rule 17 Amendments
Title Matchkaggle-ho-017667
Case Filed-29428House OversightCritique of Ex Parte Subpoenas and Proposed Rule 17 Amendments
November 11, 20252p
Case File
d-29428House OversightCritique of Ex Parte Subpoenas and Proposed Rule 17 Amendments
Other
The passage discusses procedural fairness and ABA comments on ex parte subpoenas, but does not identify specific powerful individuals, agencies, or financial transactions. It offers limited investigat Ex parte subpoenas may violate victims' confidentiality and fairness requirements. ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct opposes ex parte communications without notice. Proposed Rule 17 amendments aim t
Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017667
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.