1 duplicate copy in the archive
Plaintiffs seek court order to compel Alan Dershowitz to produce alleged documents and waive privilege in Edwards v. Dershowitz case
The passage details a procedural motion to force production of documents that the plaintiffs claim would prove Dershowitz never met a certain Jane Doe. While it identifies a high‑profile attorney, it Plaintiffs allege Dershowitz has 45 days to produce documents proving he never met Jane Doe No. 3 bu Dershowitz claims various privileges but has not filed a privilege log. The motion requests a cour
Summary
The passage details a procedural motion to force production of documents that the plaintiffs claim would prove Dershowitz never met a certain Jane Doe. While it identifies a high‑profile attorney, it Plaintiffs allege Dershowitz has 45 days to produce documents proving he never met Jane Doe No. 3 bu Dershowitz claims various privileges but has not filed a privilege log. The motion requests a cour
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
9:08-CV-80736-KAMRelated Documents (6)
Dershowitz’s Unproduced ‘Absolute Proof’ Documents and Media Claims in Epstein‑Related Defamation Litigation
The filing reveals that Alan Dershowitz repeatedly asserted on national TV that he possessed travel, credit‑card and other records proving he never met Jane Doe #3, yet has failed to produce any such Dershowitz claimed on Fox Business (Jan 7 2015) and CNN (Jan 5 2015) to have "all kinds of records" Despite a 45‑day deadline, he produced no documents and responded only with boilerplate objections
Dershowitz claims he can disprove sexual abuse allegations via flight and travel records
The passage provides a specific lead that Alan Dershowitz asserted he possesses flight and travel records that could refute a Jane Doe's abuse claim. It mentions media appearances and suggests documen Dershowitz said he can prove he never met Jane Doe No. 3 using flight and travel records. He stated the investigation would take about an hour to disprove the allegation. The claim was repeated on CN
EFTA Document EFTA01368193
Page 20 of 32 The motion claimed that the woman. who was not identified in court documents, had sexual relations as a minor with Prince Andrew in London. New York and on Mr. Epstein's private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Mr. Epstein told the woman to give the prince 'Whatever he demanded" and 'report back to him on the details? the motion said. Buckingham Palace took the unusual step of issuing a statement to rebut the accusations "This relates to longstanding and ongoing civil procee
Court filings reveal alleged non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein and references to high‑profile political figures
The document contains sworn declarations and court orders that reference a secret non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein, claims that the U.S. Government concealed it from victims, and m Petitioners allege the Government violated victims' rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act by hi Court order strikes detailed allegations but acknowledges they exist in the filings. Jane Doe 3’s
[REDACTED - Survivor] testimony and filings implicate Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jeffrey Epstein in alleged sex‑trafficking ...
The document combines a sworn complaint, detailed deposition excerpts, and internal communications that directly name high‑profile individuals (Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, former U.S. President‑li Giuffre alleges Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz were among the men she was forced to service for E The complaint states Epstein’s 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) barred federal charges against
Plaintiffs seek court order to compel Alan Dershowitz to produce documents allegedly proving innocence in alleged minor sexual abuse case
The filing indicates a dispute over undisclosed documents that could contain evidence related to a high‑profile sexual abuse allegation involving a well‑known attorney. While it flags a potential lead Defendant Alan M. Dershowitz claims to have "absolute proof" of non‑abuse but has not produced the d Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel production after a 45‑day delay. The case is filed in Broward
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.