Skip to main content
Skip to content
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Case File
d-31093House OversightOther

Acknowledgments of US-China Relations Working Group Funding and Participants

The passage only lists institutional sponsors, conveners, and participants of a research working group. It contains no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or misconduct linking powerful acto Funding provided by Hoover Institution, Asia Society's Center on US‑China Relations, and the Annenbe Involvement of scholars such as Susan Shirk, Orville Schell, and Kyle Hutzler. No specific claims

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #020452
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage only lists institutional sponsors, conveners, and participants of a research working group. It contains no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or misconduct linking powerful acto Funding provided by Hoover Institution, Asia Society's Center on US‑China Relations, and the Annenbe Involvement of scholars such as Susan Shirk, Orville Schell, and Kyle Hutzler. No specific claims

Tags

uschina-relationsresearch-acknowledgmentsinstitutional-fundinghouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Acknowledgments This Working Group was jointly convened by the Hoover Institution at Stanford University and the Center on US-China Relations at Asia Society in New York. These co-conveners have also been assisted, financially and logistically, by The Annenberg Foundation Trust at Sunnylands. We are grateful to each of these institutions for their support of our work, and to Thomas Gilligan, Director of the Hoover Institution, and Ambassador David Lane, President of The Annenberg Foundation Trust at Sunnylands, for their personal support of this project. We also thank the latter two institutions, as well as the China Policy Program of the Elliott School of International Affairs at George Washington University, for supporting and hosting meetings of the Working Group. This report has been a collaborative effort among a group of American scholars and policy practitioners who have spent long careers studying and engaging China, Asia more broadly, and a wide variety of political systems around the world. Each participant also has an abiding interest in protecting and strengthening democratic institutions in the United States and elsewhere in the world. While different participants took the lead in drafting particular sections of the report, each section was reviewed and contributed to by a number of participants in what became a truly collective and collaborative research effort. Our general findings and policy principles represent a broad—though not necessarily complete— consensus of the Working Group Participants. This Working Group grew out of the Task Force on US-China Relations (chaired by Susan Shirk and Orville Schell}, and we thank the Carnegie Corporation of New York and the Henry Luce Foundation for their support of the Task Force. Although the two efforts share many members in common, they are separate and distinct endeavors. We present this report as the collective product of discussions and research among a group of distinguished American specialists on China and US foreign affairs. It analyzes the growing challenge posed by China’s influence-seeking activities in the United States across a number of important sectors of American public life. However, as we note throughout the report, these influence activities are not confined to the US. Indeed, they appear in different forms and to different degrees in a large number of other democratic societies around the world (in some cases more deeply than in the US). We therefore have opted to include in an Appendix short summary reports on China’s influence activities (and the resulting national responses) in eight other countries, We owe a particular debt of thanks to Kyle Hutzler, an MBA student at Stanford University with significant experience in China. His superior organizational skills and uncomplaining

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

Fragmentary Text Mentions ‘Cacioppo’, ‘Nusbaum’, and ‘Chicago Social Brain Network’ in Unclear Context

Fragmentary Text Mentions ‘Cacioppo’, ‘Nusbaum’, and ‘Chicago Social Brain Network’ in Unclear Context The passage consists largely of incoherent fragments with no clear factual allegations, dates, transactions, or identifiable misconduct. It only loosely references a few names (Cacioppo, Nusbaum) and an organization (Chicago Social Brain Network) without any substantive connection to wrongdoing or power structures, offering no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Mentions a possible individual named Cacioppo.; Mentions a possible individual named Nusbaum.; References the Chicago Social Brain Network and a publication titled “Invisible Forces and Powerful Beliefs”.

1p
House OversightJan 5, 2018

Document titled “INSIDE THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE” with minimal content

Document titled “INSIDE THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE” with minimal content The file contains only a title and file identifier with no substantive information, names, dates, transactions, or allegations. It provides no actionable leads or novel insights into any controversial actions or actors. Key insights: File appears to be a placeholder or index page; No mention of individuals, agencies, or financial details

1p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
House OversightUnknown

Empty House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content

Empty House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content The provided file contains only a title and no substantive text, offering no names, transactions, dates, or allegations to pursue. Consequently, it provides no investigative leads, controversy, novelty, or power linkages. Key insights: Document contains only a header and filename.; No mention of individuals, agencies, or actions.

1p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

11 MAY 25-MAY 27 901_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Irons, Janet Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11-29 AM To: Richard C. Smith Cc: Jeffrey T. We Subject: Meeting with Prison Society tomorrow Hello Warden Smith, I'm writing in preparation for our meeting with you and Director Hite tomorrow at 9:30 to talk about the Law Library. We have been in touch with Kim Kelmor, Assistant Director ofthe Law Library at Penn State, who has experience with prison libraries. She has helpfully provided us with some questions and guida

186p
House OversightUnknown

Deep Thinking – collection of essays by AI thought leaders

Deep Thinking – collection of essays by AI thought leaders The document is a largely philosophical and historical overview of AI research, its thinkers, and societal implications. It contains no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or novel claims that point to actionable investigative leads involving influential actors. The content is primarily a synthesis of known public positions and historical anecdotes, offering limited new information for investigative follow‑up. Key insights: Highlights concerns about AI risk and alignment voiced by prominent researchers (e.g., Stuart Russell, Max Tegmark, Jaan Tallinn).; Notes the growing corporate influence on AI development (e.g., references to Google, Microsoft, Amazon, DeepMind).; Mentions historical episodes where AI research intersected with military funding and government secrecy.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.