Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-31094House OversightFinancial Record

Email discusses editors paying witnesses and criminals for stories, citing PCC code and suggesting potential unethical payments

The passage hints at possible illicit payments by media editors to witnesses or criminals for information, referencing legal guidelines. It provides a specific email chain with names (Ross, Kevin Maxw Email alleges editors can pay criminals or witnesses for stories, possibly breaching Contempt of Cou Mentions specific individuals (Ross, Kevin Maxwell, Gareth Thompson, Brian Basham) involved in the

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #030229
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage hints at possible illicit payments by media editors to witnesses or criminals for information, referencing legal guidelines. It provides a specific email chain with names (Ross, Kevin Maxw Email alleges editors can pay criminals or witnesses for stories, possibly breaching Contempt of Cou Mentions specific individuals (Ross, Kevin Maxwell, Gareth Thompson, Brian Basham) involved in the

Tags

media-influencemedia-ethicsfinancial-flowcriminal-justicewitness-paymentslegal-compliancelegal-exposurehouse-oversightjournalistic-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Date: Saturday, March 12 2011 02:15 AM Subject: Fw: Daily Mail From: Gmax To: [email protected]; -—— Original Message ----- From: Ross ¢0w a - To: C2 <i >; Ross Gow ~ 'a Jan Ian Maxwell iii .. Kevin Maxwell —_—* Gareth Thompson <j Bn eeeeeer—C—“CtiCSS Cc: Brian Basham {ii i_ i Sent: Thu Mar 10 16:29:24 2011 Subject: Re: Daily Mail Maz is the most devious and cunning of the bunch. However, Editors can pay for people, stories and documents. They can even pay criminals if it is in the public interest. Maz can pay who he wants for info but the Yorkshire Ripper for instance, as a convicted criminal, can't sell his story...unless in public interest cos there was say, a bent detective. Below is from PCC Code for Editors. It is not well drafted. 15 Witness payments in criminal trials 1) No payment or offer of payment to a witness - or any person who may reasonably be expected to be called as a witness - should be made in any case once proceedings are active as defined by the Contempt of Court Act 1981. This prohibition lasts until the suspect has been freed unconditionally by police without charge or bail or the proceedings are otherwise discontinued; or has entered a guilty plea to the court; or, in the event of a not guilty plea, the court has announced its verdict. *i1) Where proceedings are not yet active but are likely and foreseeable, editors must not make or offer payment to any person who may reasonably be expected to be called as a witness, unless the information concerned ought demonstrably to be published in the public interest and there is an over-riding need to make or promise payment for this to be done; and all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure no financial dealings influence the evidence those witnesses give. In no circumstances should such payment be conditional on the outcome of atrial. *ii1) Any payment or offer of payment made to a person later cited to give evidence in proceedings must be disclosed to the prosecution and

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Internal emails discuss Daily Mail phone‑log story linking Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew and high‑profile businessmen

The passage contains concrete references to phone‑log evidence of alleged sexual abuse involving Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, Harvey Weinstein and others. It mentio Daily Mail published telephone logs from Epstein’s Florida residence showing calls from school‑aged Messages reference Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, Harvey Weinstein and ‘Magic Dav

5p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Daily Mail phone logs link Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, Donald Trump and others to alleged sexual abuse network

The passage contains specific references to phone‑message logs allegedly seized by police that name high‑profile individuals (Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, Harvey We Phone‑message logs from Epstein’s Florida home allegedly show school‑age callers arranging massages. Ghislaine Maxwell is directly referenced in several messages. Prince Andrew is linked to a propert

5p
House OversightUnknown

Internal emails discuss Daily Mail phone‑log story linking Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew and high‑profile businessmen

Internal emails discuss Daily Mail phone‑log story linking Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew and high‑profile businessmen The passage contains concrete references to phone‑log evidence of alleged sexual abuse involving Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, Harvey Weinstein and others. It mentions specific dates (Feb 2005), locations (Florida home), and parties (Acuity Reputation, Kevin/ Ian Maxwell, Ross Gow). These details provide actionable leads for forensic verification of the logs, tracing communications, and investigating possible payments to witnesses or criminals. If true, the allegations would spark major public outrage and legal exposure for multiple powerful figures. Key insights: Daily Mail published telephone logs from Epstein’s Florida residence showing calls from school‑aged girls arranging massages.; Messages reference Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, Harvey Weinstein and ‘Magic David’ (David Copperfield).; Emails discuss legal strategy, PR response, and potential payments to witnesses, citing PCC code on journalist payments.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Prince Andrew linked to Kazakhstan investor deal and property sale amid controversy

The passage mentions a high‑profile figure (Prince Andrew) and a foreign leader’s son‑in‑law (Timur Kulibayev) in a property transaction that appears above market price, suggesting a possible financia Prince Andrew allegedly helped recruit investors for Kazakhstan after Timur Kulibayev bought his for The property, Sunninghill Park, remains empty and in disrepair. Prince Andrew continued public eng

1p
House OversightUnknown

Email discusses editors paying witnesses and criminals for stories, citing PCC code and suggesting potential unethical payments

Email discusses editors paying witnesses and criminals for stories, citing PCC code and suggesting potential unethical payments The passage hints at possible illicit payments by media editors to witnesses or criminals for information, referencing legal guidelines. It provides a specific email chain with names (Ross, Kevin Maxwell, Gareth Thompson, Brian Basham) and mentions the Yorkshire Ripper case, which could be a lead for investigating media‑law enforcement collusion. However, it lacks concrete transaction details, dates beyond the email timestamp, or direct links to high‑level officials, limiting its immediate investigative value. Key insights: Email alleges editors can pay criminals or witnesses for stories, possibly breaching Contempt of Court Act provisions.; Mentions specific individuals (Ross, Kevin Maxwell, Gareth Thompson, Brian Basham) involved in the discussion.; References the Yorkshire Ripper case as an example of a convicted criminal whose story might be bought.

1p
House OversightNov 4, 2011

Epstein deposition excerpt cited in Florida civil case alleging child sexual abuse

Epstein deposition excerpt cited in Florida civil case alleging child sexual abuse The passage merely references a prior deposition where Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, offering no new names, transactions, or actionable details beyond what is already public. It confirms existing allegations but provides no novel leads for investigation. Key insights: Cites Epstein's deposition on March 17, 2010; Notes Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about sexual preferences; Mentions adverse inference doctrine in civil procedure

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.