Legal analysis of FSIA immunity for Saudi officials and PIF bank in 9/11 ATA lawsuitsJapan Macro Watch
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Court strikes portions of filings and denies Alan Dershowitz's motion to intervene in Jane Doe case
Title Matchkaggle-ho-014682
Case Filed-35326House OversightCourt strikes portions of filings and denies Alan Dershowitz's motion to intervene in Jane Doe case
November 11, 20251p1 persons
Case File
d-35326House OversightCourt strikes portions of filings and denies Alan Dershowitz's motion to intervene in Jane Doe case
Other
The passage merely documents routine procedural rulings-striking impertinent paragraphs and denying a motion to intervene by attorney Alan Dershowitz. It contains no concrete allegations, financial fl Court ordered removal of numerous paragraphs deemed impertinent to non‑parties. Alan Dershowitz's motion to intervene was denied as moot. A sealed response filing was also struck from the record.
Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #014682
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.