Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-36603House OversightFinancial Record

Obama comments on Citigroup $50M jet purchase after receiving $45B bailout funds

The passage links a high‑profile official (President Obama) to a specific corporate expense (Citigroup’s $50 million jet) that followed a massive taxpayer bailout. While the claim is already public an Citigroup received $45 billion in taxpayer funds during the 2008‑09 financial crisis. In early 2009 Citigroup proposed buying a $50 million corporate jet. President Obama publicly called the jet purc

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #023720
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage links a high‑profile official (President Obama) to a specific corporate expense (Citigroup’s $50 million jet) that followed a massive taxpayer bailout. While the claim is already public an Citigroup received $45 billion in taxpayer funds during the 2008‑09 financial crisis. In early 2009 Citigroup proposed buying a $50 million corporate jet. President Obama publicly called the jet purc

Tags

government-oversightfinancial-flowcorporate-spendingpotential-misuse-of-public-funfinancial-bailoutcitigrouphouse-oversightobama-administration

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Forthcoming (August 2011) Future Science edited by Max Brockman, Vintage Press, New York. Is Shame Necessary? Jennifer Jacquet Jennifer Jacquet graduated with a master’s degree in environmental economics from Cornell University in 2004 and earned a PhD in 2009 from the University of British Columbia, where she now holds a postdoctoral fellowship. As part of the Sea Around Us Project, a joint collaboration between the university and the Pew Charitable Trusts, she researches market- based conservation initiatives related to seafood and other natural resources. With colleagues from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology and UBC’s Mathematics Department, She is currently conducting a series of games and experiments to study the effects of honor and shame on cooperation. Financial executives received almost $20 billion in bonuses in 2008 amid a serious financial crisis and a $245 billion government bailout. In 2008, more than 3 million American homes went into foreclosure because of mortgage blunders those same executives helped facilitate. Citigroup proposed to buy a $50-million corporate jet in early 2009, shortly after receiving $45-billion in taxpayer funds. Days later, President Obama took note in an Oval Office interview. About the jet, he said, “They should know better.” And the bonuses, he said, were “shameful.” What is shame’s purpose? Is shame still necessary? These are questions I’m asking myself. After all, it is not just bankers we have to worry about. Most social dilemmas exhibit a similar tension between individual and group interest. Energy, food, and water shortages, climate disruption, declining fisheries, increasing antibiotic resistance, the threat of nuclear warfare—all can be characterized as tragedies of the commons, in which the choices of individuals conflict with the greater good. Balancing group- and self-interest has never been easy, yet human societies display a high level of cooperation. To attain that level, specialized traits had to evolve, including such emotions as shame.’ Shame is what is supposed to occur after an individual fails to cooperate "R. Boyd & P. J. Richerson, “Culture and the evolution of human cooperation,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 364: 3281- 88 (2009).

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

Academic essay on shame, cooperation, and environmental economics

Academic essay on shame, cooperation, and environmental economics The passage is a scholarly discussion with no concrete allegations, transactions, or actionable leads involving powerful individuals or institutions. It mentions President Obama’s comment on banker bonuses and Citigroup’s jet purchase, but provides no new evidence or specifics that warrant investigation. Key insights: Cites President Obama’s criticism of banker bonuses and a Citigroup jet purchase.; References $20 billion in banker bonuses and a $245 billion government bailout in 2008.; Mentions Enron and Lehman Brothers as historical examples of corporate misconduct.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Academic essay on shame, cooperation, and environmental economics

The passage is a scholarly discussion with no concrete allegations, transactions, or actionable leads involving powerful individuals or institutions. It mentions President Obama’s comment on banker bo Cites President Obama’s criticism of banker bonuses and a Citigroup jet purchase. References $20 billion in banker bonuses and a $245 billion government bailout in 2008. Mentions Enron and Lehman Bro

11p
House OversightUnknown

Brockman, Inc. Frankfurt 2016 Hotlist – Book Proposals Catalog

Brockman, Inc. Frankfurt 2016 Hotlist – Book Proposals Catalog The passage is a marketing list of upcoming book proposals by various scholars and authors. It contains no allegations, financial transactions, or connections to political or intelligence actors. While it mentions high‑profile scientists and public intellectuals, the content is purely promotional and offers no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Lists titles, authors, and publication details for dozens of forthcoming books.; Mentions prominent academics (e.g., Daron Acemoglu, James Robinson, V.S. Ramachandran) but only in a professional context.; No references to government agencies, political figures, or illicit activities.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Broad AI risk and corporate influence overview – no concrete misconduct but many potential leads

Broad AI risk and corporate influence overview – no concrete misconduct but many potential leads The document surveys AI development, risks, and societal impacts, naming major tech firms (Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, IBM), AI labs (DeepMind, OpenAI, Future of Life Institute), and influential figures (Elon Musk, Max Tegmark, Stuart Russell). It highlights concerns about corporate data monetization, surveillance, autonomous weapons, algorithmic bias, AI in finance, legal systems, and military use. While it lacks specific allegations or detailed evidence, it points to sectors and actors where investigative follow‑up could uncover misuse, financial flows, or policy gaps. Key insights: Mentions corporate AI labs (Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, IBM) developing powerful AI systems.; Highlights AI-driven data monetization and privacy erosion via targeted advertising and surveillance.; References autonomous weapons and AI use in military contexts as a security risk.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Deep Thinking – collection of essays by AI thought leaders

Deep Thinking – collection of essays by AI thought leaders The document is a largely philosophical and historical overview of AI research, its thinkers, and societal implications. It contains no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or novel claims that point to actionable investigative leads involving influential actors. The content is primarily a synthesis of known public positions and historical anecdotes, offering limited new information for investigative follow‑up. Key insights: Highlights concerns about AI risk and alignment voiced by prominent researchers (e.g., Stuart Russell, Max Tegmark, Jaan Tallinn).; Notes the growing corporate influence on AI development (e.g., references to Google, Microsoft, Amazon, DeepMind).; Mentions historical episodes where AI research intersected with military funding and government secrecy.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Brockman, Inc. Frankfurt 2016 Hotlist – Book Proposals Catalog

The passage is a marketing list of upcoming book proposals by various scholars and authors. It contains no allegations, financial transactions, or connections to political or intelligence actors. Whil Lists titles, authors, and publication details for dozens of forthcoming books. Mentions prominent academics (e.g., Daron Acemoglu, James Robinson, V.S. Ramachandran) but only in a No references to g

28p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.