Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
dc-6301216Dept. of Justice

Ben Sasse Letter to William Barr on Epstein Suicide

August 10, 2019 The Honorable William P. Barr Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice Washington, DC. 20530 Dear Attorney General Barr: This morning, Jeffrey Epstein, the wealthy American financier indicted on numerous charges for running an international child sex trafficking ring, was found dead by apparent suicide. Epstein was being held in federal Bureau of Prisons custody after a federal judge denied him bail. Disturbingly, his suicide occurred after an incident less than three weeks ag

Date
August 19, 2019
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
dc-6301216
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

August 10, 2019 The Honorable William P. Barr Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice Washington, DC. 20530 Dear Attorney General Barr: This morning, Jeffrey Epstein, the wealthy American financier indicted on numerous charges for running an international child sex trafficking ring, was found dead by apparent suicide. Epstein was being held in federal Bureau of Prisons custody after a federal judge denied him bail. Disturbingly, his suicide occurred after an incident less than three weeks ag

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
August 10, 2019 The Honorable William P. Barr Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice Washington, DC. 20530 Dear Attorney General Barr: This morning, Jeffrey Epstein, the wealthy American financier indicted on numerous charges for running an international child sex trafficking ring, was found dead by apparent suicide. Epstein was being held in federal Bureau of Prisons custody after a federal judge denied him bail. Disturbingly, his suicide occurred after an incident less than three weeks ago when he was found injured and semi-conscious in his cell from a possible suicide attempt. News reporting indicates that he was then placed on suicide watch but may have been taken off suicide watch before today’s events. The Department of Justice failed, and today Jeffrey Epstein’s co-conspirators think they might have just gotten one last sweetheart deal. Every single person in the Justice Department — from your Main Justice headquarters staff all the way to the night-shift jailer — knew that this man was a suicide risk, and that his dark secrets couldn’t be allowed to die with him. Given Epstein’s previous attempted suicide, he should have been locked in a padded room under unbroken, 24/7, constant surveillance. Obviously, heads must roll. During your nomination process, you committed to me to ensuring that justice would be done for his victims. I was pleased to see the Department open an investigation into the mishandling of the ridiculous 2008 non-prosecution agreement, and then the decision to bring subsequent charges against Epstein. Knowing this monster’s history of thwarting justice, I also called for him to be held without bail upon his July 6 arrest. It should have been abundantly clear that Epstein would go to any lengths to avoid being held accountable for his crimes, including by killing himself. Being responsible for Epstein’s custody and prosecution, the Department of Justice should not have allowed this to happen. His death not only deprives his victims of the opportunity to confront him in court and to see him held accountable for his crimes, but also makes it harder to unravel his ring and to hold accountable the many other powerful men who raped and exploited these children. The Department must answer the following urgent questions for the American people: 1. Was Epstein in fact placed on suicide watch following his previous possible suicide attempt? 2. If so, was Epstein taken off suicide watch prior to his apparent suicide this morning? And if so, why? 3. Can you confirm that you are ordering two investigations: one — presumably Inspector General investigation — into the Bureau of Prison’s mismanagement of the incarceration of Epstein; and another — presumably FBI investigation — into any possible criminal activity surrounding this mismanagement? 4. Can you certify that all other potential evidence that investigators were pursuing relating to Epstein’s co-conspirators is being immediately secured by the Department of Justice, so that no additional evidence or potential testimony is also squandered? Thank you in advance for your resolve to peruse justice in this matter. Sincerely, Ben Sasse United States Senator Chairman, Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Oversight, Agency Action, Federal Rights and Federal Courts

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

17 August 16 through August 31 2016_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Juan Mendez Tuesday, August 16, 2016 1:10 AM Brenda A. McKinley; C. Kay Woodring; Caitlyn D. Neff; Danielle Minarchick; Eric A. Lockridge; Jeffrey T. Hite; Jonathan M. Millinder; Julie A. Simoni; Kevin T. Jeirles; Larry L. Lidgett; Lee R. Sheaffer; Lorinda L. Brown; Matthew T. Fisher; Melanie L. Gordon; Michael S. Woods; Richard C. Smith; Stephanie D. McGhee; Thomas S. Allen, Jr.; Walter E. Jeirles Calendar and Status Report 8/16/2016 20

1846p
House OversightNov 16, 2015

Draft Document Titled “The Snowden Affair: A Spy Story in Six Parts”

Draft Document Titled “The Snowden Affair: A Spy Story in Six Parts” The passage only provides a title and metadata for a 287‑page draft about the Snowden affair. It contains no specific names, dates, transactions, or allegations that could be pursued as an investigative lead. Consequently, it offers no actionable information and is likely already covered in public discourse. Key insights: Document appears to be a draft manuscript by Edward Jay Epstein.; Length indicated as 287 pages, suggesting extensive coverage.; Associated with a House Oversight file identifier (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020153).

1p
House OversightUnknown

Sparse House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content

Sparse House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content The document contains only a header and no substantive information linking any influential actors, financial flows, or misconduct. It provides no actionable leads for investigation. Key insights: Document appears to be a placeholder or file identifier only; No names, dates, transactions, or allegations present

1p
Dept. of JusticeApr 1, 2022

Judge Alison Nathan denies Ghislaine Maxwell new trial

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, –v– Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (AJN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation: Central to our system of justice is a defendant’s right to have guilt adjudged by a lay jury of one’s peers. Citizens give their time and attention to this critical role in the administration of justice, a role which is enshrined in our Constitution. Judicial officers are charged with t

40p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

WEF 2011 Participant List – Confidential Contact Information

The document is a publicly released roster of attendees at the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011. It contains no allegations, financial transactions, or misconduct, merely names and titles of b Comprehensive list of CEOs, ministers, and other senior figures attending Davos 2011. Includes heads of state, cabinet ministers, CEOs of multinational corporations, and leaders of NGOs. Contains a c

51p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Miami U.S. Attorney recuses from Jeffrey Epstein case; DOJ probe into former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta’s handling

The passage identifies concrete leads: the recusal of the Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office, the reassignment of the victims' rights case to U.S. Attorney Byung J. "BJay" Pak (Trump appointee), and an ongo Miami U.S. Attorney's Office formally recused itself from the Epstein victims' rights case. Case reassigned to U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, Byung J. "BJay" Pak, a Trump Former

3p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.