Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00058473DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: Fwd: RE: Update on the Epstein attorney visiting log jam?

To: Cc: From: Sent: Subject: Fwd: RE: Update on the Epstein attorney visiting log jam? Wed 7/31/2019 11:35:42 AM Please see the below email chain regarding the SHU attorney conference room issue. >>> Hi Just to note one additional wrinkle that is easily solved: > 7/30/2019 4:28 PM >>> Today, it sounds like our staff observed that Epstein's lawyers were able to hold onto the SHU room even after they had met with him while they waited to meet with him again. No one else gets that privilege. If a client has to be taken back to the unit, or to medical, or otherwise leave the attorney visiting area, we would have to leave, too. If he needs to be taken to another location, and his attorneys want to meet with him again, the facility can require them to get back in line like the rest of us. Today alone we had one attorney give up after waiting in the lobby for 2.5 hours. We had another attorney wait for three hours. That included a wait of an hour and fifteen minutes `after he

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00058473
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity

Summary

To: Cc: From: Sent: Subject: Fwd: RE: Update on the Epstein attorney visiting log jam? Wed 7/31/2019 11:35:42 AM Please see the below email chain regarding the SHU attorney conference room issue. >>> Hi Just to note one additional wrinkle that is easily solved: > 7/30/2019 4:28 PM >>> Today, it sounds like our staff observed that Epstein's lawyers were able to hold onto the SHU room even after they had met with him while they waited to meet with him again. No one else gets that privilege. If a client has to be taken back to the unit, or to medical, or otherwise leave the attorney visiting area, we would have to leave, too. If he needs to be taken to another location, and his attorneys want to meet with him again, the facility can require them to get back in line like the rest of us. Today alone we had one attorney give up after waiting in the lobby for 2.5 hours. We had another attorney wait for three hours. That included a wait of an hour and fifteen minutes `after he

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: Cc: From: Sent: Subject: Fwd: RE: Update on the Epstein attorney visiting log jam? Wed 7/31/2019 11:35:42 AM Please see the below email chain regarding the SHU attorney conference room issue. >>> Hi Just to note one additional wrinkle that is easily solved: > 7/30/2019 4:28 PM >>> Today, it sounds like our staff observed that Epstein's lawyers were able to hold onto the SHU room even after they had met with him while they waited to meet with him again. No one else gets that privilege. If a client has to be taken back to the unit, or to medical, or otherwise leave the attorney visiting area, we would have to leave, too. If he needs to be taken to another location, and his attorneys want to meet with him again, the facility can require them to get back in line like the rest of us. Today alone we had one attorney give up after waiting in the lobby for 2.5 hours. We had another attorney wait for three hours. That included a wait of an hour and fifteen minutes `after he got to the SHU room while Epstein was brought *back* to the room his lawyers had been holding and while medical visited him there regarding some paperwork for his fish allergy. We have attorneys who urgently need to see clients this week. We urgently need a solution. Thanks, Ori inal Messa e From: Sent: Tuesda Jul 30 2019 4:11 PM To: < Cc: Subject: Re: Update on the Epstein attorney visiting log jam? >. Thanks for getting back to us, . Just a heads up that we will likely file something with Judge Rakoff in Sayoc. Our attorneys have not been able to meet with him, and his sentencing is coming up. If there's some alternative, please let me know. Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 30, 2019, at 3:53 PM, wrote: > Hi > I have no update yet. I am hoping to have a workable solution soon, but am awaiting decisions of administrators. > Thank you, 7/30/2019 1:20 PM >>> CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_00010697 EFTA00058473 > I just got an email from a very frustrated lawyer who waited 2.5 hours and was ultimately unable to see a client housed in SHU. > Any update on this issue? > Sent from my iPhone CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_00010698 EFTA00058474

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Re: Threat case involving Claims Administrator in a federal case

From To Cc Subject: Re: Threat case involving Claims Administrator in a federal case Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 16:14:38 +0000 Importance: Normal Received. Will do. Fro Sent: Friday, December 20, 2024 11:12:40 AM To Cc Subject: Fw: Threat case involving Claims Administrator in a federal case SDNY believes the threat from the closed guardian is still an issue. Please re open the Guardian and conduct an interview of the complainant. Thanks. ASAC FBI NY Violent Crime Threat From Sent: Frida December 20 2024 10:57:37 AM To Subject: Fw: Threat case involving Claims Administrator in a federal case From Sent: Friday, December 20, 2024 10:29:02 AM To: Cc Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - RE: Threat case involving Claims Administrator in a federal case Thanks. I think someone should plan to reach out to =oday. I can explain why when we talk. Copying my colleague, Fro Sent: Friday, December 20, 2024 10:24 AM EFTA00161447 To: Subject: Re: Threat case involving Claims Admini

2p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00039011

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Fw: Threat case involving Claims Administrator in a federal case

From: To: Cc: Subject: Fw: Threat case involving Claims Administrator in a federal case Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 15:31:32 +0000 Importance: Normal ASAC FBI NYViflt Feat Cell: From: Sent: Frida December 20, 2024 10:28:38 AM To: Subject: Fw: Threat case involving Claims Administrator in a federal case From: Se To: Subject: (EXTERNAL EMAIL] - RE: Threat case involving Claims Administrator in a federal case The Jude in ed me ri ht after I hit send to correct one fact. The correct email for The email below is that of her counsel. Dan From: Sent: Friday, December 20, 2024 10:20 AM To: Subject: reat case involving aimsAdministrator in a e eral case As we discussed, US District Judge Jed Rakoff called me to report that the Claims Administrator in a case pending before him has been receiving threatening and harassing messages by email at twitter (x) following the administrator's rejection of certain claims filed by Apparently, some of the messages are also are anti-Sem

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

To: "Ruzumna, Daniel (

To: "Ruzumna, Daniel ( Cc: "Weiner, Daniel H." C Sean ( Subject: RE: Epstein Estate Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 19:43:56 +0000 I m p or ta nce: Normal "Weinstein, Marc A." 'McDonnell, Hilary" >, "Norris, Tara (x )" <.=>, "Lau, Mr. Ruzumna, Thank you for reaching out regarding the potential discovery of CSAM. I have some questions and I'd like to chat by phone to discuss in further detail about next steps. Could you let me know a time that would work for you? I'm available the rest of today and pretty open tomorrow. My cell, is the best way to reach me. Thanks and I look forward to speaking with you. Special Agent FBI New York Field Office Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking Desk: From: Ruzumna, Daniel (: Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2023 3:22 PM To: Cc: Weiner, Daniel H. ; Weinstein, Marc A. < ; McDonnell, Hilary < (xa *. ,; Lau, Sean Mr < M) Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL} - Epstein Estate >; Norris, Tara Dear Special Agent As you have apparently heard from AUSS

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 256 Filed 11/02/23 Page 1 of 23

Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 256 Filed 11/02/23 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Jane Doe 1, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Defendant. Case No. 1:22-CV-10019 (JSR) REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF (1) MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND APPROVAL OF THE PLAN OF ALLOCATION AND (2) MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES Booms SCHILLER FLOWER LLP 55 Hudson Yards New York, NY 10001 Telephone: (212) 446-2300 Fax: (212) 446-2350 EDWARDB HENDERSON LEHRMAN LLC 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Telephone: (954) 524-2820 Counsel for Class Representative Jane Doe I and the Class EFTA00145643 Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 256 Filed 11/02/23 Page 2 of 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. THE CLASS OVERWHELMINGLY SUPPORTS THE SETTLEMENT 2 III. THE COURT SHOULD OVERRULE JANE DOE 7'S OBJECT

23p
Court UnsealedJun 16, 2023

Deutsche Bank Epstein victim questionnaire

EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:22-cv-10018-JSR Document 90-2 Filed 06/16/23 Page 1 of 12 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case No. 1:22-CV-10018 (JSR) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TO: ALL VICTIMS OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S SEX TRAFFICKING VENTURE DURING THE TIME PERIOD AUGUST 19, 2013 TO AUGUST 10, 2019 (THE “CLASS PERIOD”). IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR A SETTLEMENT PAYMENT, YOU (OR CLASS COUNSEL ON YOUR BEHALF) MUST TIMELY SUBMIT A TIER ONE FORM BY ___________, 20

12p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.