Case Fileefta-efta00068383DOJ Data Set 9Subject: RE: protective order
Unknown1p
Subject: RE: protective order
From: To: Subject: RE: protective order Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:24:18 +0000 Attachments: 2019-07-22,_JE,_protective_order_for_discoveryiRMB).docx I'm sorry for the delay, totally my fault for holding it up, but updated version attached - it's basically all cosmetic edits and slight additional protections, but take a look and see if I've gone astray. Or if either/both of you don't feel inclined to review, that's fine too, and either way once I get either your comments or thumbs up I'll send along to the chiefs. From: Sent: Sunday. July 21 2019 12 21 To: Subject: RE: protective order Thanks very much for drafting. I lean in favor of allowing the defendant to review sensitive discovery material in the presence of counsel. Otherwise, we risk complaints from the defense team that they cannot adequately prepare their defense. Sent: un ay, uy To: Su ject. protective order Team, A draft protective order is saved here-let me know what you think: Usa.doj.gov\ cloud \ NYS St
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.