Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00068881DOJ Data Set 9Other

Cr1r1r)

Cr1r1r) Florida Office Bradley J. Edwards *Ol Seth M. Lehrman *1- Brittany N. Henderson *0 Matthew D. Weissing EDWARDS POTTINGER LLC October 21, 2020 FOIA PRIVACY EXEMPTION VIA E-MAIL AND FEDEX The Honorable Geoffrey S. Berman United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Assistant United States Attorney 86 Chambers Street, Third Floor Dear] New York Office J. Stanley Porringer j Admitted in California 0 Admitted in District of Columbia • Admitted m Florida t Admitted in New York I Heard Certified Civil Trial I.suwr Re: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request) Victim: In follow up to our previous communications, please accept this as our formal written request for documentary and tangible evidence currently in the in the possession, custody, and control of the Department of Justice by way of the Southern District of New York relating to the sexual abuse of one of Jeffrey Epstein's many victims, Jane Doe 2.' See United Stat

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00068881
Pages
3
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

Cr1r1r) Florida Office Bradley J. Edwards *Ol Seth M. Lehrman *1- Brittany N. Henderson *0 Matthew D. Weissing EDWARDS POTTINGER LLC October 21, 2020 FOIA PRIVACY EXEMPTION VIA E-MAIL AND FEDEX The Honorable Geoffrey S. Berman United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Assistant United States Attorney 86 Chambers Street, Third Floor Dear] New York Office J. Stanley Porringer j Admitted in California 0 Admitted in District of Columbia • Admitted m Florida t Admitted in New York I Heard Certified Civil Trial I.suwr Re: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request) Victim: In follow up to our previous communications, please accept this as our formal written request for documentary and tangible evidence currently in the in the possession, custody, and control of the Department of Justice by way of the Southern District of New York relating to the sexual abuse of one of Jeffrey Epstein's many victims, Jane Doe 2.' See United Stat

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Cr1r1r) Florida Office Bradley J. Edwards *Ol Seth M. Lehrman *1- Brittany N. Henderson *0 Matthew D. Weissing EDWARDS POTTINGER LLC October 21, 2020 FOIA PRIVACY EXEMPTION VIA E-MAIL AND FEDEX The Honorable Geoffrey S. Berman United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Assistant United States Attorney 86 Chambers Street, Third Floor Dear] New York Office J. Stanley Porringer j Admitted in California 0 Admitted in District of Columbia • Admitted m Florida t Admitted in New York I Heard Certified Civil Trial I.suwr Re: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request) Victim: In follow up to our previous communications, please accept this as our formal written request for documentary and tangible evidence currently in the in the possession, custody, and control of the Department of Justice by way of the Southern District of New York relating to the sexual abuse of one of Jeffrey Epstein's many victims, Jane Doe 2.' See United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951). We make this written request pursuant to the Touhy regulations codified as 28 C.F.R. § 16.21 et seq. Should you find there to be any deficiencies within this request, please notify us and we will do what is necessary to correct any such shortcomings. Jane Doe 2 Jane Doe 2 was sexually assaulted by prolific pedophile, Jeffrey Epstein, from 2000 through 2004. From the time they met when she was only thirteen years old, Epstein sexually abused and assaulted Jane Doe 2 in the most horrific ways imaginable. Throughout the years of abuse, Epstein sent a number of gifts to Jane Doe 2, record of which we believe is currently in the Government's ' To protect her anonymity, our client, Jane Doe 2. As such, we have referred to her herein as Jane Doe 2. has elected to proceed as a EFTA00068881 Page 2 possession as a result of the investigation that was conducted into Epstein's criminal activity relating to the sexual abuse of minor children. Given the highly relevant nature of this tangible evidence to Jane Doe 2's civil claim, we request production of documentary evidence relating to Jane Doe 2 in order to enable her to prove her claims from both a liability and damages standpoint. We specifically seek copies of the following documents that we believe are currently in the possession of the Government: I) Photographs of Jane Doe 2; 2) Videos of Jane Doe 2; 3) Any and all correspondence between Jeffrey Epstein, his agents, employees, medical providers, or attorneys and Jane Doe 2; 4) Any and all records of purchases of gifts or anything of value purchased for or sent to Jane Doe 2; 5) Any and all records showing that a letter or package was sent via U.S. Mail, UPS, FedEx, or by any other means of shipping from Jeffrey Epstein, his agents, or his employees to Jane Doe 2; 6) Any and all records of payments made to medical providers on behalf of Jane Doe 2; 7) Any and all documents including Jane Doe 2's true name; 8) Any and all lists including Jane Doe 2's true name; and 9) Any and all other documentary materials relating in any way to Jane Doe 2. Pursuant to the Touhy regulations set forth by the Department of Justice, the Deputy or Associate Attorney General assesses the following considerations in determining whether disclosure is warranted: (a)( I ) Whether such disclosure is appropriate under the rules of procedure governing the case or mater in which the demand arose; (a)(2) Whether disclosure is appropriate under the relevant substantive law of privilege. This request satisfies both of these considerations. As explained previously, the requested non-privileged documentary evidence directly concerns the allegations in Doe's civil case. Due to the establishment of the Epstein Victim Compensation Program that is currently underway, Jane Doe 2 seeks this information in order to properly submit her claim for consideration, and if necessary, to proceed by way of formal litigation. The requested information is within the scope of ordinary practice and does not seek disclosure of information prohibited by statute or regulation. Furthermore, this request does not seek information that is classified or that would reveal the source or identity of any informant. To that effect, Jane Doe 2 specifically does not request any investigatory records compiled for law enforcement purposes that would interfere with ongoing law enforcement proceedings. Jane Doe 2 simply requests information in the Government's possession that will assist in the prosecution of her claims and ultimately, aid in her ability to finally obtain the justice that she deserves. To the extent that the requested materials can be made available to Jane Doe 2 on an expedited basis, it would be greatly appreciated. EFTA00068882 Page 3 Please contact us at your earliest convenience to discuss the identity of Jane Doe 2 in more detail, at which time we are fully prepared to answer any questions that you may have. Very truly yours, EDWARDS POTTINGER LLC Bradley Edwards Brittany Henderson EFTA00068883

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 317-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/12/2015 Page 1 of 8

8p
DOJ Data Set 9Financial RecordUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 312-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2015 Page 1 of 25

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 312-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2015 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION TO JANE DOE NO. 1 AND JANE DOE NO. 2's PROTECTIVE MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 15 TO AMEND THEIR PETITION TO CONFORM TO EXISTING EVIDENCE AND TO ADD JANE DOE NO. 3 AND JANE DOE NO. 4 AS PETITIONERS Respondent United States, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Opposition to Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2's Motion pursuant to Rule 15 to Amend their Petition to Conform to Existing Evidence and to Add Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4 as Petitioners, and states: I. THE CAREFUL BALANCE THAT CONGRESS STRUCK WITH THE CVRA COUNSELS AGAINST THE EXPANSION OF THESE CVRA PROCEEDINGS TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL CLAIMS OR PARTIES. Petitioners have filed their "protective" motion to amend their petit

25p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-LAP Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support Of Iler Objections to tnsealinu Sealed Materials Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue EFTA00074964 Ca_QatIgt24743tictoWneDbtOrfiefiVIMOXIle?BOWERKVaffizte12401 22 Introduction This Court asked the parties to brief three issues: "(a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to an item, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction of the item, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access to the item." DE 1044 at 1. Plaintiff and the Miami Herald's responses improperly afford the highest level of presumption to discovery dispute documents, deny that any co

40p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING CO-CONSPIRATOR IMMUNITY PROVISION AND RELATED SUBJECTS COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce within 30 days the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE 99) directing discovery in this case, the Court's Order denying the Government's motion to dismiss and lifting stay of discovery (DE 189), the Court's Omnibus Order (DE 190), and the Court's Order Denying Motion to Join (DE 324): BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have repeatedly asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in thi

8p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

(USAFLS)

(USAFLS) From: Roy Black < Sent: Wednesda , Februa 11, 2015 8:50 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Your phone call Great. Speak to you then. Original Message From: (USAFLS) Imailt Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 8:49 AM To: Roy Black Subject: Re: Your phone call Hi Roy. Thanks for your message. Dexter wants to participate in the call so it is helpful to have a roadmap of the discussion points. We will call your office at 2:00. If there is a better number to call, just shoot me an email. Talk to you soon. Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 S. Australian Ave, Ste 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 On Feb 10, 2015, at 7:35 PM, "Roy Black" < mailto: wrote: Marie I was not calling you about the correspondence so don't worry about that. I called you to discuss the plaintiff's replies filed as dockets 310 and 311. We think there are serious misstatements by them in these pleadings. So I just wanted to let you know what our suggested responses are.

389p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of 40

40p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.