Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 2
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT 19 EFTA00081293 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 2 (USAFLS) iirom: (USAFLS) nt: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 12:44 PM 'Jay Lefkowitz' ubject: RE. Draft Agreements? Hi Jay — It looks like I will be here all afternoon, but earlier is better than later. There arc a number of issues with your version. but one that you can look at before our call is the calculation of the guidelines on the I 512(d) counts. The cross-reference to 2X3. I applies, which then takes us to 2G1.3. Giving Mr. Epstein the benefit of the doubt (that they would treat this as though there were only one victim), he would have a base offense level of 24, plus 2 for a commercial sex act, totaling 26. Returning to 2X3.1. we would subtract 6 levels and subtract another 3 levels for acceptance for a total offense level of 17. With criminal history category of I, that
Summary
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT 19 EFTA00081293 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 2 (USAFLS) iirom: (USAFLS) nt: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 12:44 PM 'Jay Lefkowitz' ubject: RE. Draft Agreements? Hi Jay — It looks like I will be here all afternoon, but earlier is better than later. There arc a number of issues with your version. but one that you can look at before our call is the calculation of the guidelines on the I 512(d) counts. The cross-reference to 2X3. I applies, which then takes us to 2G1.3. Giving Mr. Epstein the benefit of the doubt (that they would treat this as though there were only one victim), he would have a base offense level of 24, plus 2 for a commercial sex act, totaling 26. Returning to 2X3.1. we would subtract 6 levels and subtract another 3 levels for acceptance for a total offense level of 17. With criminal history category of I, that
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (3)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Related Documents (6)
Prosecutors allegedly colluded with Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyers to downplay federal charges and secure a lenient plea
The passage alleges that senior U.S. attorneys and a federal prosecutor (Andrew Acosta, Paul Villafafia) worked with Epstein’s legal team to limit federal prosecution, manipulate venue, and keep victi Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Lourie attempted to strike references to a defendant’s prior sexual c U.S. Attorney Paul Villafafia negotiated with Epstein’s lawyers while an FBI investigation was act
The email chain between Ann Marie Villafana and Jay Lefkowitz discusses the potential charges and ag...
The email chain between Ann Marie Villafana and Jay Lefkowitz discusses the potential charges and agreements related to Mr. Epstein's case, including a plea agreement and non-prosecution agreement, and the need for factual basis to support the charges.
From: jeffrey epstein
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Subject: RE: Epstein
Subject: RE: Epstein Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:26:56 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Signed_Plea_Agreement.pdf; Final_Addendum.pdf Here is the signed agreement and an addendum. Please note that it has a confidentiality clause. Thanks. SEMI Subject: Re: Epstein Ok thx. Would you send me your last proposed nonpros with them with the 2255 language? Sent: Wed Nov 28 16:48:48 2007 Subject: FW: Epstein This is the first that I have heard about another attempt to meet with someone in Washington. I thought I would give you a heads up. Hope all is well, Andy. EFTA00214817 Subject: Fw: Epstein Can u send Jay the proposed letter and redact the names? Thx, Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Jay Lefkowitz <[email protected]> Sent: Wed Nov 28 16:29:09 2007 Subject: Re: Epstein I received your email yesterday and was a little surprised at the tone of your letter, given the fact that we spoke last week and had what I thought was a prod
Federal prosecutors allegedly back‑down on Epstein victim notifications after pressure from Epstein’s lawyers, with DOJ officials’ communications revealing internal conflict
Federal prosecutors allegedly back‑down on Epstein victim notifications after pressure from Epstein’s lawyers, with DOJ officials’ communications revealing internal conflict The passage provides concrete names (Jeffrey Sloman, Acosta, Lefkowitz, Starr) and dates (2008, 2013) showing possible obstruction of victim notifications in the Epstein case, suggesting a lead for investigating DOJ and FBI decision‑making. While it ties high‑level officials, the claim of pressure from Epstein’s attorneys is not yet corroborated, limiting the score to the high‑mid range. Key insights: Jeffrey Sloman, top aide to U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, planned to notify Epstein victims after a plea deal was signed.; Lefkowitz warned Acosta that the office had promised not to contact victims or potential claimants.; Federal prosecutors resumed the FBI investigation and interviewed witnesses in NY and NM while plea negotiations continued.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.