Subject: Fwd:
From: Subject: Fwd: Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 03:56:24 +0000 Inline-Images: imagel jpeg Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Brittany Henderson Date: Se tember 30, 2019 at : : To: Cc: Brad Edwards <brad e 11c.com>, " I have attached the two photographs that we have of from the relevant time period. Brad and I are both currently out of the office, but will get documents to you when we get back. Thanks, EFTA00082106 EFTA00082107 Brittany Henderson, Esq. Edwards Pottinger LLC On Sep 30, 2019, at 9:48 AM, Hi Brad, > wrote: Just following up on this— we're happy to take these by whatever method is easiest for you. One option would be to mail us a CD or thumb drive, but please let us know what works for you. On the subject of documents relating to do you have any photographs of her from the relevant time period? Or are you able to ask her if she has them? Thanks, From: Brad Edwards Sent: Monday, Septem er , : PM To: < >; Brittany Henderson Cc: I <
Summary
From: Subject: Fwd: Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 03:56:24 +0000 Inline-Images: imagel jpeg Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Brittany Henderson Date: Se tember 30, 2019 at : : To: Cc: Brad Edwards <brad e 11c.com>, " I have attached the two photographs that we have of from the relevant time period. Brad and I are both currently out of the office, but will get documents to you when we get back. Thanks, EFTA00082106 EFTA00082107 Brittany Henderson, Esq. Edwards Pottinger LLC On Sep 30, 2019, at 9:48 AM, Hi Brad, > wrote: Just following up on this— we're happy to take these by whatever method is easiest for you. One option would be to mail us a CD or thumb drive, but please let us know what works for you. On the subject of documents relating to do you have any photographs of her from the relevant time period? Or are you able to ask her if she has them? Thanks, From: Brad Edwards Sent: Monday, Septem er , : PM To: < >; Brittany Henderson Cc: I <
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
11c.comRelated Documents (6)
Filing # 35429605 E-Filed 12/11/2015 10:08:04 AM
Case 09-34791-RBR
Alleged Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Shielded Jeffrey Epstein from a 53‑count indictment and kept victims uninformed
Alleged Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Shielded Jeffrey Epstein from a 53‑count indictment and kept victims uninformed The passage cites a specific non‑prosecution agreement that allegedly prevented a 53‑count federal indictment of Jeffrey Epstein and describes victim‑exclusion tactics. It names dates, a federal prosecutor’s draft indictment, and references to legal filings, offering concrete leads for further FOIA or court‑record requests. While the claim is not novel—Epstein’s NPA has been reported—it provides actionable details (Feb 10 2016 filing, Sept 2007 signing, June 30 2008 termination) that could be pursued to verify the agreement’s terms, the officials who negotiated it, and any potential misconduct by DOJ or the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Key insights: A 53‑count indictment prepared by federal prosecutors was never filed due to an NPA.; Victims were allegedly not consulted about the NPA, violating victim‑rights statutes.; The NPA was signed in September 2007 and remained in effect until June 30, 2008.
Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated
Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated The passage hints at a possible concealment of evidence in a high‑profile defamation dispute involving Alan Dershowitz, a prominent attorney, and references the infamous Giuffre allegations. While it names well‑known legal figures, it provides no concrete financial transactions, dates, or new factual revelations beyond already public claims, limiting its investigative utility. However, the suggestion that a court record may be sealed to hide potentially damaging testimony offers a moderate lead for further document‑review and freedom‑of‑information requests. Key insights: Dershowitz requests the court to declare portions of Ms. Giuffre’s affidavit confidential.; He publicly denies the allegations on BBC Radio 4, framing them as a coordinated false‑story campaign.; Dershowitz threatens perjury prosecution against accusers and seeks disbarment of opposing counsel.
The Palm Beach Post
EFTA01838551
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.