Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00095048DOJ Data Set 9

Subject: FW: question for a Vox story

Other

From: Subject: FW: question for a Vox story Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 15:11:00 +0000 I'll just tell her assault of a minor is not a federal statue. From: Anna North - Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 10:39 AM To: Subject: Re: question for a Vox story Yes, to clarify, what I'm asking is why the US Attorney's office brought sex trafficking and conspiracy charges specifically, rather than other criminal charges (sexual assault, for example). On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 10:34 AM Biase, Nicholas (USANYS) < wrote: Hi, sorry for the delayed response. I'm not sure if I completely understand your inquiry. Is it a matter of illegal conduct over a certain timeframe? Or why we charged sex trafficking and conspiracy, rather than other criminal charges? Thanks. From: Anna North <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 10:29 AM To: Subject: Re: question for a Vox story Just wanted to follow up on this -- I actually have a little more time on this story if your office has any respo

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00095048
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.