To: "Brittany Henderson" <brittanygepllc.com>
To: "Brittany Henderson" <brittanygepllc.com> Cc: "Brad Edwards" <bradgeplIc.corn>, "Maria Kelljchian" <MariageplIc.com> Subject: RE: Epstein Victims Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 15:05:16 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: image001.png No worries! They only day that does not work for me is Tuesday. I can make any other day work next week. Special Agent FBI New York Field Office Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking C: From: Brittany Henderson <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2020 9:12 AM To: Cc: Brad Edwards <[email protected]>; Maria Kelljchian <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Epstein Victims Sorry about the delay this week. I have had trouble coordinating with one of the girls. Can we pick a day next week? Whatever works for you. EDWARDS POTTINGER LLC Brittany Henderson Trial Attorney 425 North Andrews Avenue. Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale. Florida 33301 Direct Dial: 954.323.2074 Office: 954-524-2820 I Facsimile: 954-524.2822 brittanvagplIc.com I www.epllc.co
Summary
To: "Brittany Henderson" <brittanygepllc.com> Cc: "Brad Edwards" <bradgeplIc.corn>, "Maria Kelljchian" <MariageplIc.com> Subject: RE: Epstein Victims Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 15:05:16 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: image001.png No worries! They only day that does not work for me is Tuesday. I can make any other day work next week. Special Agent FBI New York Field Office Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking C: From: Brittany Henderson <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2020 9:12 AM To: Cc: Brad Edwards <[email protected]>; Maria Kelljchian <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Epstein Victims Sorry about the delay this week. I have had trouble coordinating with one of the girls. Can we pick a day next week? Whatever works for you. EDWARDS POTTINGER LLC Brittany Henderson Trial Attorney 425 North Andrews Avenue. Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale. Florida 33301 Direct Dial: 954.323.2074 Office: 954-524-2820 I Facsimile: 954-524.2822 brittanvagplIc.com I www.epllc.co
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (29)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
bradpepllc.combradraeplic.combrittanvagplic.combrittanyffleplic.combrittanyfflsplic.combrittanygepllc.combrittanypeplic.combrittanypsplic.commariageplic.commariapeplic.commariapepllc.comwww.epllc.com[email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]Facsimile: 954-524.2822Facsimile: 954.524-2822Facsimile: 954.524.2822954-323-2074954-524-2820954-524.2820954-524.2822954.323.2074954.524-2822954.524.2820954.524.2822Related Documents (6)
Filing # 35429605 E-Filed 12/11/2015 10:08:04 AM
Case 09-34791-RBR
Alleged Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Shielded Jeffrey Epstein from a 53‑count indictment and kept victims uninformed
Alleged Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Shielded Jeffrey Epstein from a 53‑count indictment and kept victims uninformed The passage cites a specific non‑prosecution agreement that allegedly prevented a 53‑count federal indictment of Jeffrey Epstein and describes victim‑exclusion tactics. It names dates, a federal prosecutor’s draft indictment, and references to legal filings, offering concrete leads for further FOIA or court‑record requests. While the claim is not novel—Epstein’s NPA has been reported—it provides actionable details (Feb 10 2016 filing, Sept 2007 signing, June 30 2008 termination) that could be pursued to verify the agreement’s terms, the officials who negotiated it, and any potential misconduct by DOJ or the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Key insights: A 53‑count indictment prepared by federal prosecutors was never filed due to an NPA.; Victims were allegedly not consulted about the NPA, violating victim‑rights statutes.; The NPA was signed in September 2007 and remained in effect until June 30, 2008.
Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated
Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated The passage hints at a possible concealment of evidence in a high‑profile defamation dispute involving Alan Dershowitz, a prominent attorney, and references the infamous Giuffre allegations. While it names well‑known legal figures, it provides no concrete financial transactions, dates, or new factual revelations beyond already public claims, limiting its investigative utility. However, the suggestion that a court record may be sealed to hide potentially damaging testimony offers a moderate lead for further document‑review and freedom‑of‑information requests. Key insights: Dershowitz requests the court to declare portions of Ms. Giuffre’s affidavit confidential.; He publicly denies the allegations on BBC Radio 4, framing them as a coordinated false‑story campaign.; Dershowitz threatens perjury prosecution against accusers and seeks disbarment of opposing counsel.
The Palm Beach Post
EFTA01838551
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.