Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00187034DOJ Data Set 9Other

LAW OFFICES

LAW OFFICES LYONS AND SANDERS C MAR TIE RED DALE R. SANDERS • BRUCE M. LYONS •• HOWARD L. OREITZER EDWARD D. BERBER D909-IOSTI 'ALSO ADMITTED IN WrOMIN0 • 'ALSO ADMITTED IN COLORADO February 14, 2007 Assistant US Attorney 500 South Australian Ave Ste 400 West • Dear Ms. INS Grand Jury Subpoena By agreement, on January 25, 2007, and served me with a grand jury subpoena for my client, to appear on February 13, 2007. I indicated that would assert her rights under the Fifth Amendment and on consent, the appearance has been extended. You have asked me to set out the basis for my request and that you apply through appro riate channels for a formal grant of use immunity for . I do so here. As I indicated to you when we conversed last week, is no longer employed by Mr. Epstein, but has read much of what can be found on the Internet about the investigation of Mr. Epstein. From that review, she is aware that the police considered charging several persons cl

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00187034
Pages
4
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

LAW OFFICES LYONS AND SANDERS C MAR TIE RED DALE R. SANDERS • BRUCE M. LYONS •• HOWARD L. OREITZER EDWARD D. BERBER D909-IOSTI 'ALSO ADMITTED IN WrOMIN0 • 'ALSO ADMITTED IN COLORADO February 14, 2007 Assistant US Attorney 500 South Australian Ave Ste 400 West • Dear Ms. INS Grand Jury Subpoena By agreement, on January 25, 2007, and served me with a grand jury subpoena for my client, to appear on February 13, 2007. I indicated that would assert her rights under the Fifth Amendment and on consent, the appearance has been extended. You have asked me to set out the basis for my request and that you apply through appro riate channels for a formal grant of use immunity for . I do so here. As I indicated to you when we conversed last week, is no longer employed by Mr. Epstein, but has read much of what can be found on the Internet about the investigation of Mr. Epstein. From that review, she is aware that the police considered charging several persons cl

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
LAW OFFICES LYONS AND SANDERS C MAR TIE RED DALE R. SANDERS • BRUCE M. LYONS •• HOWARD L. OREITZER EDWARD D. BERBER D909-IOSTI 'ALSO ADMITTED IN WrOMIN0 • 'ALSO ADMITTED IN COLORADO February 14, 2007 Assistant US Attorney 500 South Australian Ave Ste 400 West Dear Ms. INS Grand Jury Subpoena By agreement, on January 25, 2007, and served me with a grand jury subpoena for my client, to appear on February 13, 2007. I indicated that would assert her rights under the Fifth Amendment and on consent, the appearance has been extended. You have asked me to set out the basis for my request and that you apply through appro riate channels for a formal grant of use immunity for . I do so here. As I indicated to you when we conversed last week, is no longer employed by Mr. Epstein, but has read much of what can be found on the Internet about the investigation of Mr. Epstein. From that review, she is aware that the police considered charging several persons close to Mr. Epstein, including at least one employee. Given that, and the seemingly broad scope of the investigation, asserts her rights under the Fifth Amendment. Indeed, considering that both the state authorities in Palm Beach County and your office are conducting investigations, there is every reason for her to be concerned and therefore to assert her constitutional rights. If you continue to want her to appear before a grand jury, be advised that she will assert EFTA00187034 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 820-8711 Facsimile: (561) 820-8777 January 24, 2007 DELIVERY BY HAND Bruce M. Lyons Lyons and Sanders 600 Northeast 3rd Avenue Fort Lauderdale, FL 33304 Re: Federal Grand July Subpoena Dcar Bruce: A new grand jury has been em aneled and I have enclosed a new subpoena for As I mentioned earlier, is not a target of this investigation and the United States seeks her testimony solely as a witness. During our last conversation regarding you indicated that she was unwilling to speak with us pursuant to a Ka SE letter. Please confer with her to confirm whether this remains her position. If EMI is not amenable to an informal meeting, she must still appear pursuant to the subpoena so that I may ask her questions that would not require the invocation of the Fifth Amendment, If she still invokes, I intend to move to compel her answers. If you or your client is unavailable on February 6, 2007, please let me know of another Tuesday when you are available. I also am concerned about a potential conflict of interest in your representation of. . In case of future litigation regarding this issue, please provide me with information regarding who is paying (directly or indirectly) for your services on behalf of the scope of your representation, and whether you are taking direction on this matter from anyone other than.-. If any formal or informal joint defense agreements exist, whether in writing or otherwise, please provide a copy of such agreements. If the agreement is purely oral, please provide a written summary of its terms. EFTA00187035 BRUCE LYONS, ESQ. JANUARY 24, 2007 PAGE 2 I look forward to your response. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: S EFTA00187036 United States District Court SOUTH!' RN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TO: SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY BEFORE GRAND JURY FGJ 07-103(WPB)-TuesfNo. OLY-24-3 SUBPOENA FOR: PERSON DOCUMENTS OR OBJECT'S' YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to appear and testify before the Grand Jury of the United States District Court at the place, date and time specified below. PLACE: United States District Courthouse 701 Clematis Street West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 ROOM: Grand Jury Room DATE AND TIME: February 6, 2007 1:00 pm" YOU ARE ALSO COMMANDED to bring with you the following document(s) or object(s): Any and all records related to your employment with Jeffrey Epstein, including but not limited to paystubs, W-2 forms, correspondence, employment applications, and employment reviews. Any and all information regarding methods to contact Jeffrey Epstein directly or via any secretaries/assistants from 1/1/2004 to the present, including but not limited to, telephone numbers, cellular telephone numbers, Blackberry addresses, e-mail addresses, and mailing addresses. Any and all information regarding appointments for massages performed on Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach, Florida or elsewhere. *Please coordinate your compliance with this sub oena and confirm the date and time, and location of our a earance with Special Agent , Federal Bureau of Investigation, Telephone: This subpoena shall remain in effect until you are granted leave to depart by the court or by an officer acting on behalf of the court. DATE: January 23, 2007 (BY) DEPUTY CLERK Name Address and Phone Number of Assistant U.S. Attorney , Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 So. Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach. FL 33401-6235 Tel: Toe, mod it kg ofAO110 FORM ORD-227 JAN.86 EFTA00187037

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

FaxFacsimile: (561) 820-8777
Phone(561) 820-8711
Phone(561) 820-8777
Phone401-6235

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

IN RE:

IN RE: INVESTIGATION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN Non-Prosecution Agreement IT APPEARING that the City of Palm Beach Police Department and the State Attorney's Office for the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (hereinafter, the "State Attorney's Office") have conducted an investigation into the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"); IT APPEARING that the State Attorney's Office has charged Epstein with one count of solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Florida Statutes Section 796.07; IT APPEARING that the interest of the United States pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the following procedure expressed in this Agreement; IT APPEARING that the United States Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation have conducted their own investigation of Epstein's background and offenses including; knowingly and willfully conspiring with others known and unknown to commit an offense against the United States, in violation of Titl

6p
House OversightUnknown

Assistant U.S. Attorney David Weinstein allegedly leaked confidential Epstein prosecution details to NYT reporter

Assistant U.S. Attorney David Weinstein allegedly leaked confidential Epstein prosecution details to NYT reporter The passage suggests possible prosecutorial misconduct and unauthorized media leaks in the Jeffrey Epstein case, providing names, dates, and alleged actions that could be followed up. However, similar allegations have been reported before, limiting novelty and impact. Key insights: Assistant U.S. Attorney David Weinstein discussed confidential prosecution strategy with NYT reporter Landon Thomas.; Weinstein allegedly disclosed specifics about alleged phone luring and interstate travel for underage sex.; Weinstein reportedly warned the reporter not to trust Epstein's defense attorneys and framed the conversation as hypothetical.

1p
House OversightFBI ReportNov 11, 2025

Document references alleged Epstein non‑prosecution deal, FBI evidence, and pressure on U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Acosta during his 2017 labor‑secreta...

The passage links high‑level officials (Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Acosta, FBI, and the Trump administration) to a possible non‑prosecution agreement and alleged interference in a Mentions a non‑prosecution deal for Jeffrey Epstein referenced in an FLBI FOIA release. Claims FBI had sufficient evidence to prosecute but was allegedly overruled by political pressure. Alleges U.S.

3p
House OversightUnknown

Federal prosecutors allegedly back‑down on Epstein victim notifications after pressure from Epstein’s lawyers, with DOJ officials’ communications revealing internal conflict

Federal prosecutors allegedly back‑down on Epstein victim notifications after pressure from Epstein’s lawyers, with DOJ officials’ communications revealing internal conflict The passage provides concrete names (Jeffrey Sloman, Acosta, Lefkowitz, Starr) and dates (2008, 2013) showing possible obstruction of victim notifications in the Epstein case, suggesting a lead for investigating DOJ and FBI decision‑making. While it ties high‑level officials, the claim of pressure from Epstein’s attorneys is not yet corroborated, limiting the score to the high‑mid range. Key insights: Jeffrey Sloman, top aide to U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, planned to notify Epstein victims after a plea deal was signed.; Lefkowitz warned Acosta that the office had promised not to contact victims or potential claimants.; Federal prosecutors resumed the FBI investigation and interviewed witnesses in NY and NM while plea negotiations continued.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Prosecutors allegedly colluded with Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyers to downplay federal charges and secure a lenient plea

The passage alleges that senior U.S. attorneys and a federal prosecutor (Andrew Acosta, Paul Villafafia) worked with Epstein’s legal team to limit federal prosecution, manipulate venue, and keep victi Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Lourie attempted to strike references to a defendant’s prior sexual c U.S. Attorney Paul Villafafia negotiated with Epstein’s lawyers while an FBI investigation was act

1p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014046

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.