Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00210855DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: Jane Doe I United States - Govt Opposition to Motion to Add Jane Doe #3 and #4

Subject: Jane Doe I United States - Govt Opposition to Motion to Add Jane Doe #3 and #4 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 21:56:12 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 290_ExA.pdf; 290_ExB.pdf; 290_ExC.pdf; 290_govt_opp _join jane_doe_3&4.pdf I have attached the government's opposition to the petitioners' motion to add Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4 to this CVRA lawsuit. Jane Doe #3 is the one who has made the allegations of sexual abuse against Prince Andrew and Professor Dershowitz. There are three exhibits: (1) September 3, 2008 Notification Letter to Jane Doe #3; (2) Jane Doe #3's civil lawsuit filed on May 1, 2009 against Epstein for sexual abuse under 18 U.S.C. 2255; and (3) extract of phone conversation between Jane Doe #3 and attorney Jack Scarola and Brad Edwards, in civil lawsuit filed by Epstein against Edwards and Scott Rothstein, in Palm Beach County Circuit Court. kstos. Thanks. for their contributions to this opposition. If you have any questions, please call me at I M

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00210855
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity

Summary

Subject: Jane Doe I United States - Govt Opposition to Motion to Add Jane Doe #3 and #4 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 21:56:12 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 290_ExA.pdf; 290_ExB.pdf; 290_ExC.pdf; 290_govt_opp _join jane_doe_3&4.pdf I have attached the government's opposition to the petitioners' motion to add Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4 to this CVRA lawsuit. Jane Doe #3 is the one who has made the allegations of sexual abuse against Prince Andrew and Professor Dershowitz. There are three exhibits: (1) September 3, 2008 Notification Letter to Jane Doe #3; (2) Jane Doe #3's civil lawsuit filed on May 1, 2009 against Epstein for sexual abuse under 18 U.S.C. 2255; and (3) extract of phone conversation between Jane Doe #3 and attorney Jack Scarola and Brad Edwards, in civil lawsuit filed by Epstein against Edwards and Scott Rothstein, in Palm Beach County Circuit Court. kstos. Thanks. for their contributions to this opposition. If you have any questions, please call me at I M

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Subject: Jane Doe I United States - Govt Opposition to Motion to Add Jane Doe #3 and #4 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 21:56:12 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 290_ExA.pdf; 290_ExB.pdf; 290_ExC.pdf; 290_govt_opp _join jane_doe_3&4.pdf I have attached the government's opposition to the petitioners' motion to add Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4 to this CVRA lawsuit. Jane Doe #3 is the one who has made the allegations of sexual abuse against Prince Andrew and Professor Dershowitz. There are three exhibits: (1) September 3, 2008 Notification Letter to Jane Doe #3; (2) Jane Doe #3's civil lawsuit filed on May 1, 2009 against Epstein for sexual abuse under 18 U.S.C. 2255; and (3) extract of phone conversation between Jane Doe #3 and attorney Jack Scarola and Brad Edwards, in civil lawsuit filed by Epstein against Edwards and Scott Rothstein, in Palm Beach County Circuit Court. kstos. Thanks. for their contributions to this opposition. If you have any questions, please call me at I M EFTA00210855

Related Documents (6)

House OversightNov 4, 2011

Epstein deposition excerpt cited in Florida civil case alleging child sexual abuse

Epstein deposition excerpt cited in Florida civil case alleging child sexual abuse The passage merely references a prior deposition where Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, offering no new names, transactions, or actionable details beyond what is already public. It confirms existing allegations but provides no novel leads for investigation. Key insights: Cites Epstein's deposition on March 17, 2010; Notes Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about sexual preferences; Mentions adverse inference doctrine in civil procedure

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Dershowitz Seeks Intervention in Epstein Victims’ CVRA Case, Citing Alleged False Accusations Involving Clinton, Gore, and Prince Andrew

The filing outlines a contested claim that Alan Dershowitz was defamed in a victim‑rights case and references unverified allegations that former President Bill Clinton, former Vice President Al Gore, Dershowitz argues the allegations against him were fabricated and surfaced only in a 2014 joinder mo The brief cites Jane Doe #3’s sworn statements claiming Bill Clinton and Al Gore were on Epstein’s

18p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

14p
DOJ Data Set 9Financial RecordUnknown

DS9 Document EFTA01178092

54p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Judge denies gag order in Epstein‑Edwards lawsuit, dismisses complaint alleging threats to powerful friends

The passage mentions alleged attempts by Jeffrey Epstein to leverage threats against high‑profile individuals (Donald Trump, Bill Clinton) to intimidate a lawyer representing victims. It also referenc Epstein’s lawsuit claims attorney Brad Edwards threatened to depose “powerful friends” including Don Edwards allegedly used questionable investigative methods, such as trespassing on Epstein’s proper

1p
House OversightApr 17, 2019

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specific actions (e.g., alleged drafting of the NPA, defamatory statements, settlement confidentiality) and dates that could be pursued for documentary evidence, witness interviews, and financial‑flow analysis. If substantiated, the lead would expose potential prosecutorial misconduct and high‑level collusion, generating major public outrage. Key insights: Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz.; Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded Epstein and co‑conspirators.; Acosta, then U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, approved the NPA; later became Trump’s Secretary of Labor.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.