(USAFLS)"
From: To: ' Cc: (USAFLS)" Subject: FW: Draft Agreements? Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:18:07 +0000 Importance: High Attachments: Agreement_updated.doc.rtf : Please see below so you understand my frustration. This document is completely different from what Jay just told they would agree to. He has it written as 16 months' imprisonment followed by 8 months federal supervised release. He wants us to recommend an improper calculation of the guidelines, and he wants to waive the PSI so he can keep all of his information confidential. I have already told Jay that the PSI language and other language in this agreement was unacceptable to our office. I will send back a plea agreement that reads consistent with what Jay represented to but I don't believe that this will be resolved by Tuesday unless they come down here and we have a group contract writing session with the state attorney's office and the decision-makers. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West
Summary
From: To: ' Cc: (USAFLS)" Subject: FW: Draft Agreements? Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:18:07 +0000 Importance: High Attachments: Agreement_updated.doc.rtf : Please see below so you understand my frustration. This document is completely different from what Jay just told they would agree to. He has it written as 16 months' imprisonment followed by 8 months federal supervised release. He wants us to recommend an improper calculation of the guidelines, and he wants to waive the PSI so he can keep all of his information confidential. I have already told Jay that the PSI language and other language in this agreement was unacceptable to our office. I will send back a plea agreement that reads consistent with what Jay represented to but I don't believe that this will be resolved by Tuesday unless they come down here and we have a group contract writing session with the state attorney's office and the decision-makers. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
Prosecutors allegedly colluded with Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyers to downplay federal charges and secure a lenient plea
The passage alleges that senior U.S. attorneys and a federal prosecutor (Andrew Acosta, Paul Villafafia) worked with Epstein’s legal team to limit federal prosecution, manipulate venue, and keep victi Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Lourie attempted to strike references to a defendant’s prior sexual c U.S. Attorney Paul Villafafia negotiated with Epstein’s lawyers while an FBI investigation was act
The email chain between Ann Marie Villafana and Jay Lefkowitz discusses the potential charges and ag...
The email chain between Ann Marie Villafana and Jay Lefkowitz discusses the potential charges and agreements related to Mr. Epstein's case, including a plea agreement and non-prosecution agreement, and the need for factual basis to support the charges.
From: jeffrey epstein
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Subject: RE: Epstein
Subject: RE: Epstein Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:26:56 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Signed_Plea_Agreement.pdf; Final_Addendum.pdf Here is the signed agreement and an addendum. Please note that it has a confidentiality clause. Thanks. SEMI Subject: Re: Epstein Ok thx. Would you send me your last proposed nonpros with them with the 2255 language? Sent: Wed Nov 28 16:48:48 2007 Subject: FW: Epstein This is the first that I have heard about another attempt to meet with someone in Washington. I thought I would give you a heads up. Hope all is well, Andy. EFTA00214817 Subject: Fw: Epstein Can u send Jay the proposed letter and redact the names? Thx, Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Jay Lefkowitz <[email protected]> Sent: Wed Nov 28 16:29:09 2007 Subject: Re: Epstein I received your email yesterday and was a little surprised at the tone of your letter, given the fact that we spoke last week and had what I thought was a prod
Federal prosecutors allegedly back‑down on Epstein victim notifications after pressure from Epstein’s lawyers, with DOJ officials’ communications revealing internal conflict
Federal prosecutors allegedly back‑down on Epstein victim notifications after pressure from Epstein’s lawyers, with DOJ officials’ communications revealing internal conflict The passage provides concrete names (Jeffrey Sloman, Acosta, Lefkowitz, Starr) and dates (2008, 2013) showing possible obstruction of victim notifications in the Epstein case, suggesting a lead for investigating DOJ and FBI decision‑making. While it ties high‑level officials, the claim of pressure from Epstein’s attorneys is not yet corroborated, limiting the score to the high‑mid range. Key insights: Jeffrey Sloman, top aide to U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, planned to notify Epstein victims after a plea deal was signed.; Lefkowitz warned Acosta that the office had promised not to contact victims or potential claimants.; Federal prosecutors resumed the FBI investigation and interviewed witnesses in NY and NM while plea negotiations continued.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.