Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01776678DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01776678

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01776678
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Matthew I. Menchel Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 3:38 PM To: [email protected]* Subject: Re: Would love to attend but I just took a week off in Beaver Creek. Have another FINRA arbitration starting soon. Matthew I. Menchel KOBRE & KIM LLP www.kobrekim.com New York I London I Hong Kong I Washington, DC I Miami From: Jeffrey Epstein Imailto:[email protected] Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 11:24 AM To: Matthew I. Menchel Subject: Re: she was amusing„ the pritskers are running many things at the aspen institute , if you would like to attend On Sun Jul 10 2011 at 10:31 AM Matthew I. Menchel wrote: Yes, that was Sloman's wife but she came out to visit us alone. Jeff is in Miami. Maybe next time you are in Florida we can all get together. KOBRE & KIM LLP www.kobrekim.com <http://www.kobrekim.com> <http://www.kobrekim.com/> New York I London I Hong Kong I WashingtonDC I Miami From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> » Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 22:31:30 -0400 To: Matthew Menchel EFTA_R1_00091476 EFTA01776678 I assume her friend was slomans wife„ is he in aspen? I would love to meet him The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmailcom <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]», and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved This e-mail message is from Kobre & Kim LIP, a law firm, and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail message and any attachments from your computer without retaining a copy. IRS Circular 230 disclosure: Any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments or enclosures) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication. (The foregoing disclaimer has been affixed pursuant to U.S. Treasury regulations governing tax practitioners.) The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved This e-mail message is from Kobre & Kim LLP, a law firm, and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for 2 EFTA_R1_00091477 EFTA01776679 delivering the message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail message and any attachments from your computer without retaining a copy. IRS Circular 230 disclosure: Any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments or enclosures) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication. (The foregoing disclaimer has been affixed pursuant to U.S. Treasury regulations governing tax practitioners.) 3 EFTA_R1_00091478 EFTA01776680

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

URLhttp://www.kobrekim.com

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01776708

0p
House OversightUnknown

Internal DOJ correspondence reveals contested plea negotiations and alleged obstruction tactics in the Epstein case

Internal DOJ correspondence reveals contested plea negotiations and alleged obstruction tactics in the Epstein case The passage details internal disputes over indictment strategy, alleged obstruction of justice, and negotiations involving a high‑profile defendant (Mr. Epstein). It names several prosecutors and defense counsel, suggesting possible misconduct or pressure on the Office of the State Attorney. While the identities are not top‑level officials, the connection to a potentially infamous figure and claims of fabricated charges provide a concrete avenue for further investigation (e.g., request FOIA records, interview involved attorneys). The information is moderately novel and could spark controversy if substantiated. Key insights: Accusations that a prosecutor (J. P. Lefkowicz) hid or manipulated evidence in an indictment package.; Claims that the Office delayed indictment for five months to allow defense presentations.; Alleged pressure to avoid prosecuting certain charges (obstruction of justice, obscene calls, child privacy violations).

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

Summary or Timeline Document: DOJ-OGR-00023045

This document summarizes the USAO's roles and responsibilities during the Epstein investigation from 2006 to 2009 and lists key events, including the opening of the federal investigation, signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and Epstein's guilty plea and release.

1p
OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 329 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2015 Page 1 of 2

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01325031

20p
House OversightUnknown

Attorney‑Generated Oversight Memo Accuses DOJ Prosecutors of Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, and Political Motives in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Case

Attorney‑Generated Oversight Memo Accuses DOJ Prosecutors of Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, and Political Motives in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Case The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged DOJ misconduct—including unauthorized subpoenas, misrepresentations to the court, undisclosed financial incentives to witnesses, ex‑parte communications, and leaks to the press—while naming senior DOJ officials (Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip, Assistant U.S. Attorneys Marie Villafana and Jeffrey Sloman) and linking the case to former President Bill Clinton’s notoriety. These allegations, if substantiated, could expose abuse of prosecutorial discretion, potential violations of DOJ ethics rules, and political influence, making it a strong investigative lead. However, much of the material is defensive in nature and repeats known procedural complaints, limiting its novelty and concrete evidentiary hooks. Key insights: Alleged illegal re‑issuance of a grand‑jury subpoena after a Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was signed (July 1 2008 subpoena).; Claims that AUSA Villafana disclosed confidential case details to the New York Times and leaked information to reporter Landon Thomas.; Accusations that Villafana attempted to appoint a personal friend of her live‑in boyfriend as attorney‑representative for victims, suggesting a conflict of interest.

1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01860997

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.