Mr. Okula
Attorney/Representing the court
Mentioned in 40 documents. Roles: Attorney/Representing the court, attorney, Counsel for one of the defendants, Prosecutor, recipient of Ms. Conrad's letter
Mr. Okula is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
5 sources for document mentions
The document is a court transcript of a redirect examination of witness Ms. Brune. Prosecutor MR. OK...
“The document is a court transcript of a redirect examination of witness Ms. Brune. Prosecutor MR. OK”
Deposition Transcript: 120-ec1-00330-PAE
“The witness, Conrad, is being questioned about her husband's criminal history, which she allegedly c”
court transcript: 1:20-cr-00303-PAE Document 611 Filed 02/24/22
“The transcript shows the redirect examination of witness Ms. Edelstein, with the court asking questi”
Court Transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE
“The transcript shows a discussion between the court and counsel regarding Catherine Conrad's request”
Court Transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 161 Filed 02/24/22 Page 93 of 130
“The document is a court transcript of a redirect examination of witness Ms. Brune. Prosecutor MR. OK”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 181 documents”
Known Connections (34)
Document Mentions (42)
The document is a court transcript of a redirect examination of witness Ms. Brune. Prosecutor MR. OK...
The document is a court transcript of a redirect examination of witness Ms. Brune. Prosecutor MR. OKULA clarifies that the government did not conduct an independent investigation after receiving a note, as they deemed it innocuous, and corrects Ms. Brune's speculation about the government's knowledge and actions.
Deposition Transcript: 120-ec1-00330-PAE
The witness, Conrad, is being questioned about her husband's criminal history, which she allegedly concealed during voir dire. She is also questioned about her father's employment with the Justice Department and her own involvement in a disciplinary proceeding, which she failed to disclose.
court transcript: 1:20-cr-00303-PAE Document 611 Filed 02/24/22
The transcript shows the redirect examination of witness Ms. Edelstein, with the court asking questions about the disclosure of information regarding Juror No. 1 and whether the law firm would have disclosed it without the court's inquiry or the government's action. The witness responds that they thought it would come out at some point during the proceedings.
Court Transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE
The transcript shows a discussion between the court and counsel regarding Catherine Conrad's request to close the courtroom during her testimony due to concerns about her medical condition and disciplinary proceedings. The court denies the request, citing prior public disclosures and the defendants' right to a public proceeding.
Court Transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 161 Filed 02/24/22 Page 93 of 130
The document is a court transcript of a redirect examination of witness Ms. Brune. Prosecutor MR. OKULA clarifies that the government did not conduct an independent investigation after receiving a note, as they deemed it innocuous, and corrects Ms. Brune's speculation about the government's knowledge and actions.
deposition transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616-20 Filed 02/24/22 Page 623 of 130
The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Ms. Brune, where she discusses her conversations with defense counsel and the receipt of a jury note. She testifies that she had conversations with co-counsel after receiving a copy of a letter and that the communications were joint defense communications. The witness also mentions being upset upon reading the jury note and verifying information on the Bar website.
Court Transcript: 1:20-cv-00338-PAE
The transcript documents Catherine Conrad's testimony in the case United States v. Daugerdas, where she is questioned about her previous statements and actions as a juror, and initially invokes her Fifth Amendment privilege before being granted use immunity.
Court Transcript: 1:20-cv-13003
This document is a transcript of a court proceeding on February 15, 2012, featuring testimonies from Theresa Marie Trzaskoma and Catherine M. Conrad, with various attorneys conducting direct and cross-examinations, and a list of government and defense exhibits received into evidence.
Deposition Transcript: 1:20-cv-30033
The document is a deposition transcript where Ms. Conrad is being questioned about her financial situation and credibility. She is asked about her cash on hand, stocks, and bonds, as well as her tax filing history. The questioning attorney attempts to challenge her credibility and financial disclosure.
court transcript: 1:20-cv-300380-PAE
The transcript records the cross-examination of Juror Conrad, who is questioned about her residence and potential misrepresentation during voir dire. Conrad admits to having two addresses, one in the Bronx and one in Westchester, and is challenged about her initial statement that she resided in Bronxville. The questioning also touches on her husband's criminal history and her father's role as an immigration judge.
Court Transcript: 6152/20
The prosecution rests its case after submitting Government Exhibit 10 into evidence without objection. The defense then calls its first witness, Paul Schoeman, to testify.
Court Transcript: 616201
The document appears to be a partial transcript of a court case, 'UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.', with discussions on various topics including witness testimony, objections, and court rulings. The transcript includes a list of words with their frequency and context, indicating it might be an index or a concordance of the testimony.
Court Transcript: 64432
The transcript is of a court proceeding where Ms. Edelstein is being questioned about her law firm's handling of information regarding Juror No. 1, including whether they would have disclosed it to the Court if not prompted. The discussion also touches on whether they considered raising it as an appellate issue.
Court Transcript: A-5634
The court discusses a request to close the courtroom during the testimony of Catherine Conrad, a witness, due to concerns about her medical condition and disciplinary proceedings. The court denies the request, citing prior public disclosures and the defendants' right to a public proceeding. Conrad is expected to assert her Fifth Amendment rights during testimony.
deposition transcript: A-5640
The document is a transcript of Conrad's deposition testimony, where they are questioned about their conduct in rejecting a subpoena, their medication, and their understanding of their rights during a hearing with Judge Pauley. Conrad's responses suggest a lack of clarity or cooperation, and the questioning attorney presses for specific details about their interactions with the judge and their financial situation.
Showing 15 of 42 documents. View all →
This dossier on Mr. Okula was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.