Paul H. Schoeman, Esq.
attorney mentioned in conversation
Mentioned in 6 documents. Roles: attorney mentioned in conversation, Attorney filing affidavit, Attorney, submitting affidavit, person involved in conversation with Trzaskoma, Witness for Defendant Parse
Paul H. Schoeman, Esq. is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
7 sources for document mentions
deposition transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616220 Filed 02/24/22 Page 613 of 130
“The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Ms. Brune, where she is questioned about h”
deposition transcript: A-5746
“The witness, Brune, is being questioned about her knowledge of a conversation regarding Trzaskoma's ”
Court Transcript: 6152/20
“The prosecution rests its case after submitting Government Exhibit 10 into evidence without objectio”
Court Transcript: A-5815
“The prosecution rests its case after moving Government Exhibit 10 into evidence without objection. T”
Court Filing - Exhibit List: 1:20-cv-03038-PAE Document 616-1
“This document is an exhibit list from a court filing in Case 1:20-cv-03038-PAE, referencing various ”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 24 documents”
Known Connections (10)
Document Mentions (7)
deposition transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616220 Filed 02/24/22 Page 613 of 130
The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Ms. Brune, where she is questioned about her knowledge of Ms. Trzaskoma's potential attorney suspension and the actions taken by her team during the eight-day jury deliberation period.
Court Filing - Exhibit List: 1:20-cv-03038-PAE Document 616-1
This document is an exhibit list from a court filing in Case 1:20-cv-03038-PAE, referencing various documents from the Conrad v. Manessis case, including trial testimony, verdict, and post-trial motions. The exhibits include affirmations, affidavits, and other records related to the case. The list provides a catalog of documents submitted as evidence or used in the proceedings.
Court Filing - Exhibit List: 2020-08-000086-BE-N
This document is a list of exhibits filed in a court case, including orders, affirmations, judgments, testimony excerpts, and affidavits related to Conrad v. Manessis. The exhibits cover trial proceedings, post-trial motions, and evidence. The list appears to be part of a larger court filing.
Court Transcript: 6152/20
The prosecution rests its case after submitting Government Exhibit 10 into evidence without objection. The defense then calls its first witness, Paul Schoeman, to testify.
deposition transcript: A-5746
The witness, Brune, is being questioned about her knowledge of a conversation regarding Trzaskoma's potential status as a suspended attorney and her team's actions during jury deliberations. Brune indicates she was not aware of the conversation at the time and that her team could have raised concerns before the verdict. The deposition highlights the witness's recollection of events and her team's presence during jury deliberations.
Court Transcript: A-5815
The prosecution rests its case after moving Government Exhibit 10 into evidence without objection. The defense then calls its first witness, Paul Schoeman, to testify.
Index of Examination: A-5838
This document is an index of examinations conducted during a court proceeding, listing witnesses and the attorneys who questioned them. It includes the names of witnesses Susan Brune, Laura Edelstein, Paul Schoeman, and Barry H. Berke, as well as attorneys Ms. Davis, Mr. Shechtman, and Mr. Okula. The document was prepared by Southern District Reporters, P.C.
This dossier on Paul H. Schoeman, Esq. was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.