Skip to main content
Skip to content
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Case File
d-15333House OversightOther

Email chain discussing InsightsPod data analytics for Trump election predictions

The passage contains routine communications about a data‑analytics service and scheduling a call. It mentions Donald Trump only in the context of public opinion polling, without any allegation of wron Zubair Khan promotes InsightsPod's tweet‑analysis service for election forecasting. The emails arrange a Skype call to discuss the business plan. Reference to processing 3 million tweets for Trump po

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #026014
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage contains routine communications about a data‑analytics service and scheduling a call. It mentions Donald Trump only in the context of public opinion polling, without any allegation of wron Zubair Khan promotes InsightsPod's tweet‑analysis service for election forecasting. The emails arrange a Skype call to discuss the business plan. Reference to processing 3 million tweets for Trump po

Tags

social-media-analyticsbusiness-opportunitydata-analyticshouse-oversightbusiness-communicationselection-forecasting

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
On Nov 4, 2016, at 6:07 PM, Zubair Khan iii wrote: Trump is definitely winning popular vote so far. According to our data winning chances of Trump are 52% in Electoral college. On Nov 4, 2016, at 5:46 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: thats in the popular vote , not talking into account the elctoral college? On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Zubair Khan > wrote: Hi Jeffrey, According to InsightsPod Trump is more popular. We processed 3 million tweets this week. [have attached detailed report. Regards, Zubair On Oct 9, 2016, at 4:06 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: jeevacation On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Zubair Khan iii wrote: What is your Skype ID? Thanks. On Saturday, 8 October 2016, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: yes On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 7:07 AM, Zubair Khan > wrote: Hi Jeffrey, Are you available to talk today? Regards, Zubair On Oct 6, 2016, at 11:24 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: skyype good this weekend? On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 5:42 AM, Zubair Khan <> wrote: Hi Jeffrey, Just wondered if you have time to discuss the business plan of InsightsPod on Skype or if you prefer I can meet you in person after 19th Oct. Regards, Zubair On Sunday, 25 September 2016, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: Skype this week? On Sunday, 25 September 2016, Zubair Khan <> wrote: Hi Jeftrey, Please find attached InsightsPod business plan for your consideration. Since Twitter is live streaming the presidential debates, the social media activity will accelerate and it will help us in making better predictions of outcome. It was apparent from the US Election report, which I sent you previously that we need a Data Scientist who can

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

Trump’s Preference for Non‑Traditional Military Advisers and Tension Over Strategic Briefings

Trump’s Preference for Non‑Traditional Military Advisers and Tension Over Strategic Briefings The passage outlines internal dynamics within the Trump administration regarding the selection and dismissal of national security advisers, highlighting the president’s aversion to data‑driven briefings and preference for personalities like Flynn and Caslen. While it names high‑profile officials (Trump, McMaster, Flynn, Bolton, Kushner), it provides no concrete evidence of wrongdoing, financial flows, or illegal actions, limiting its investigative utility. However, it does suggest a pattern of decision‑making that could be explored for potential impacts on policy outcomes, especially around the Syrian chemical attack. Key insights: Trump disliked data‑heavy PowerPoint briefings and preferred narrative‑driven advisers.; Tension existed between Trump and NSC adviser H.R. McMaster over briefing style.; Trump considered firing McMaster and was influenced by personal relationships (son‑in‑law claim).

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

InsightsPod marketing deck outlining social‑media sentiment analysis services

The document is a commercial presentation describing a sentiment‑analysis platform, its features, pricing, and founding team. It contains no allegations, financial flows, or connections to high‑level Describes a SaaS product for real‑time social‑media sentiment analysis. Lists potential customers: retailers, politicians, investors. Provides case study data on Brexit and 2016 US election sentiment

2p
House OversightUnknown

Trump UK State Visit Amid Feud with London Mayor Sadiq Khan

Trump UK State Visit Amid Feud with London Mayor Sadiq Khan The excerpt merely notes a state visit and a vague feud with the London mayor, offering no concrete details, transactions, or actionable leads. It lacks specificity, novelty, or direct links to high‑level misconduct. Key insights: President Donald Trump is on a state visit to the United Kingdom.; There is an ongoing dispute between Trump and London Mayor Sadiq Khan.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Internal email discussing predictive social‑media model for 2016 election

Internal email discussing predictive social‑media model for 2016 election The passage contains a casual discussion of a data‑driven election‑prediction tool and mentions a possible link to Clinton’s FBI clearance spike, but provides no concrete names, transactions, or actionable leads. It lacks novelty and does not implicate high‑ranking officials in wrongdoing. Key insights: Zubair Khan claims their model correctly predicted Trump’s win based on social‑media data.; Mentions a spike in Clinton’s positive sentiment after an FBI clearance.; Discusses potential use of the tool for future elections (France, Brazil).

1p
House OversightJan 5, 2018

Document titled “INSIDE THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE” with minimal content

Document titled “INSIDE THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE” with minimal content The file contains only a title and file identifier with no substantive information, names, dates, transactions, or allegations. It provides no actionable leads or novel insights into any controversial actions or actors. Key insights: File appears to be a placeholder or index page; No mention of individuals, agencies, or financial details

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Economic briefing on secular stagnation, productivity, and Trump’s GDP growth targets

The passage is a policy‑focused analysis that mentions high‑profile officials (Trump, Yellen, Fischer) but offers no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or actionable investigative leads. It U.S. labor force growth projected at 0.6% per year versus 1.6% historically. Infrastructure investment and tax reforms cited as possible growth boosters. President‑elect Donald Trump’s 3‑4% GDP growt

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.