1 duplicate copy in the archive
Jury demand filing in case 1:15-cv-07433 signed by David Boies and colleagues
The document is a routine procedural filing (jury demand) with no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to powerful actors beyond the attorneys. It offers no investigative leads. Filed on September 21, 2015 in federal case 1:15-cv-07433 Signed by prominent attorney David Boies and other counsel from Boies Schiller & Flexner Requests a jury trial on all causes of action
Summary
The document is a routine procedural filing (jury demand) with no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to powerful actors beyond the attorneys. It offers no investigative leads. Filed on September 21, 2015 in federal case 1:15-cv-07433 Signed by prominent attorney David Boies and other counsel from Boies Schiller & Flexner Requests a jury trial on all causes of action
Persons Referenced (3)
“lexner LLP 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 /s/ Sigrid McCawley Sigrid McCawley (Pro Hac Vice Pending) Boies Sc”
David Boies“n this pleading. Dated September 21, 2015. /s/ David Boies David Boies Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP 333 Ma”
Ellen Brockman“200 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 (954) 356-0011 /s/ Ellen Brockman Ellen Brockman Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP 575”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (3)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
1:15-CV-07433(212) 446-2300(954) 356-0011Related Documents (6)
[REDACTED - Survivor] testimony and filings implicate Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jeffrey Epstein in alleged sex‑trafficking and possible NPA cover‑up
[REDACTED - Survivor] testimony and filings implicate Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jeffrey Epstein in alleged sex‑trafficking and possible NPA cover‑up The document combines a sworn complaint, detailed deposition excerpts, and internal communications that directly name high‑profile individuals (Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, former U.S. President‑linked figures) and describe alleged illegal conduct, a non‑prosecution agreement, and possible FBI involvement. It provides specific dates, locations, and payment details that can be pursued for forensic financial tracing and further legal discovery, making it a strong, actionable lead with high public sensitivity. Key insights: Giuffre alleges Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz were among the men she was forced to service for Epstein.; The complaint states Epstein’s 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) barred federal charges against him and co‑conspirators, and granted immunity to Maxwell.; FBI agents located Giuffre in Australia in 2011 and de‑briefed her at the U.S. Consulate, indicating law‑enforcement awareness of the network.
[REDACTED - Survivor] testimony and filings implicate Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jeffrey Epstein in alleged sex‑trafficking ...
The document combines a sworn complaint, detailed deposition excerpts, and internal communications that directly name high‑profile individuals (Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, former U.S. President‑li Giuffre alleges Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz were among the men she was forced to service for E The complaint states Epstein’s 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) barred federal charges against
Jury demand filing in case 1:15-cv-07433 signed by David Boies and colleagues
Jury demand filing in case 1:15-cv-07433 signed by David Boies and colleagues The document is a routine procedural filing (jury demand) with no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to powerful actors beyond the attorneys. It offers no investigative leads. Key insights: Filed on September 21, 2015 in federal case 1:15-cv-07433; Signed by prominent attorney David Boies and other counsel from Boies Schiller & Flexner; Requests a jury trial on all causes of action
Sealed Declaration in Giuffre v. Epstein Motion to Compel Production of Epstein’s Phone Records, Contact List, and Message Pads
Sealed Declaration in Giuffre v. Epstein Motion to Compel Production of Epstein’s Phone Records, Contact List, and Message Pads The filing reveals a court‑ordered request for Epstein’s sealed phone records, contact list, and message pad excerpts, which could contain undisclosed connections to powerful individuals. While the case is already public, the specific documents sought are not, offering a concrete investigative avenue. The lead is moderately controversial and potentially high‑impact if the records expose further elite networks, but it does not yet name top‑level officials directly. Key insights: Plaintiff [REDACTED - Survivor] seeks a court order compelling Jeffrey Epstein to produce phone records, a contact list, and message pad excerpts.; The documents are filed as sealed exhibits, indicating they may contain undisclosed information.; Exhibit 4 references Ghislaine (likely Ghislaine Maxwell), suggesting her involvement in the communications.
Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated
Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated The passage hints at a possible concealment of evidence in a high‑profile defamation dispute involving Alan Dershowitz, a prominent attorney, and references the infamous Giuffre allegations. While it names well‑known legal figures, it provides no concrete financial transactions, dates, or new factual revelations beyond already public claims, limiting its investigative utility. However, the suggestion that a court record may be sealed to hide potentially damaging testimony offers a moderate lead for further document‑review and freedom‑of‑information requests. Key insights: Dershowitz requests the court to declare portions of Ms. Giuffre’s affidavit confidential.; He publicly denies the allegations on BBC Radio 4, framing them as a coordinated false‑story campaign.; Dershowitz threatens perjury prosecution against accusers and seeks disbarment of opposing counsel.
Affidavit alleges Alan Dershowitz visited Jeffrey Epstein’s mansion during alleged sexual abuse of minors
The passage provides sworn testimony from two Epstein household employees that directly places a high‑profile attorney, Alan Dershowitz, at the Epstein residence while underage girls were present, inc Household employee Juan Alessi testified Dershowitz visited the mansion 4‑5 times a year, staying 2‑ Alessi said Dershowitz was present when [REDACTED - Survivor] was at the house and received mas
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.