Skip to main content
Skip to content
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Case File
d-22265House OversightOther

Israeli delegation planning for a secret Camp David summit with limited team members

The passage lists senior Israeli officials and mentions a closed‑door summit with President Clinton, but provides no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or misconduct. It is largely a recoll President Clinton scheduled to attend G8 summit in Japan on July 19, limiting time for Camp David ta Israeli delegation includes high‑level security and legal figures such as Danny Yatom, Shlomo Ben‑

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011819
Pages
1
Persons
10
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage lists senior Israeli officials and mentions a closed‑door summit with President Clinton, but provides no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or misconduct. It is largely a recoll President Clinton scheduled to attend G8 summit in Japan on July 19, limiting time for Camp David ta Israeli delegation includes high‑level security and legal figures such as Danny Yatom, Shlomo Ben‑

Tags

israelpeace-negotiationsunited-statespolitical-negotiationcamp-davidhighlevel-diplomatic-engagemenhouse-oversightforeign-policy

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
/ BARAK / 62 I was confident of finally answering that question at the summit. Camp David was different from Shepherdstown. No reporters would be there. Mobile phones were banned. Each delegation had one landline. We’d also be operating under a time constraint. President Clinton was due to leave for a G8 summit in Japan on July 19. The gave us barely a week. I did wonder whether that would be enough, even if both sides were committed to reaching a peace agreement. Yet I hoped it would at least provide the possibility, as it had for Begin and Sadat twenty-two years earlier, to reach a framework agreement that open the door to a final peace treaty. Not just the time, but the numbers were limited. We and the Palestinians could have only a dozen members in our negotiating teams. Some of my choices were automatic: Danny Yatom; Shlomo Ben-Ami, whom I’d made acting Foreign Minister in Levy’s absence; Amnon Lipkin and Attorney-General Elyakim Rubinstein; Gilead Sher and his chief negotiating aide, Gidi Grinstein. I also took along a strong security team, including Shlomo Yanai, head of strategic planning the kirya, and Israel Hason, a former deputy-head of Shin Bet. There was another important, if less obvious, inclusion: Dan Meridor. A leading member of the Likud before he’d formed the Center Party at the last election, Dan was not just a friend. He was a man of rock-solid integrity, with a strong moral and ethical compass, who put principle over party. He was also a lawyer, and had been Minister of Justice under Bibi. Along with Attorney-General Rubinstein, I knew I’d have a gifted legal team if we got to the point of considering the specifics of a peace agreement. There was another consideration as well. Both Dan and Elyakim were right-of-center politically. I felt I needed their voices as a kind of litmus for the tough decisions, and concessions, I might have to consider if an agreement did prove possible. I was not nervous as we crossed the Atlantic, though even those who knew me best assumed I would be. Nava had sent me off with a list of dietary instructions, almost like a surgeon general’s warning that Camp David might prove hazardous to my health. But I felt prepared. I’d gone to every source I could find about the Begin-Sadat summit. I knew there would be periods of crisis and that at certain points I’d have to allow leeway for my own team to explore possible compromises beyond our set negotiating limits. Yet none of this altered my belief that holding the summit was the right thing to do, nor my confidence in being able to play my part. I did feel a huge responsibility. Decades after our conflict with the 348

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

Israeli Prime Minister’s Camp David Statement Reflects Disappointment Over Unmet Peace Steps

Israeli Prime Minister’s Camp David Statement Reflects Disappointment Over Unmet Peace Steps The passage is a personal recollection without specific names, dates, transactions, or actionable allegations. It mentions President Clinton and Camp David but provides no concrete leads on misconduct, financial flows, or illegal activity, making it low‑value for investigation. Key insights: Speaker identifies as Israeli Prime Minister and former special‑forces commander.; Expresses disappointment that planned peace initiatives over the past 14 days did not materialize.; References a prior meeting with President Bill Clinton at Camp David a year earlier.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Israeli official recounts planning for a secret Camp David peace summit with Palestinians in 1990s

Israeli official recounts planning for a secret Camp David peace summit with Palestinians in 1990s The passage provides a personal recollection of team composition and logistical details for a diplomatic summit, but offers no concrete allegations, financial flows, or misconduct involving high‑profile actors. It merely names senior Israeli officials and mentions President Clinton’s travel schedule, without suggesting actionable leads. Key insights: Summit was to be held at Camp David with strict communication controls.; Negotiating team included senior Israeli security and legal figures such as Danny Yatom, Shlomo Ben‑Ami, Amnon Lipkin, Elyakim Rubinstein, Shlomo Yanai, and Dan Meridor.; President Clinton was scheduled to leave for a G8 summit in Japan on July 19, creating a tight timeline.

1p
House OversightNov 29, 2017

Israeli Prime Minister’s reflective statement after Camp David meeting with President Clinton

Israeli Prime Minister’s reflective statement after Camp David meeting with President Clinton The passage is a personal narrative lacking specific allegations, transaction details, or actionable leads. It mentions high‑profile figures (the Israeli PM and President Clinton) but provides no concrete evidence of misconduct, financial flows, or policy breaches, limiting its investigative value. Key insights: Speaker identifies as Israeli Prime Minister, former special‑forces commander.; Reference to a recent meeting at Camp David with President Bill Clinton.; Expresses disappointment over unspecified outcomes of the past two weeks.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Israeli delegation planning for a secret Camp David summit with limited team members

Israeli delegation planning for a secret Camp David summit with limited team members The passage lists senior Israeli officials and mentions a closed‑door summit with President Clinton, but provides no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or misconduct. It is largely a recollection of team composition and logistics, offering minimal investigative leads. Key insights: President Clinton scheduled to attend G8 summit in Japan on July 19, limiting time for Camp David talks.; Israeli delegation includes high‑level security and legal figures such as Danny Yatom, Shlomo Ben‑Ami, Amnon Lipkin, Attorney‑General Elyakim Rubinstein, Shlomo Yanai, and former Shin Bet deputy‑head Israel Hason.; Dan Meridor, former Likud member and ex‑Minister of Justice, was included for political balance.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Clinton Administration Negotiations on Jerusalem Reveal Internal Disagreements and Potential Leaks

Clinton Administration Negotiations on Jerusalem Reveal Internal Disagreements and Potential Leaks The passage details a high‑level discussion between U.S. officials (President Clinton, Madeleine Albright, Sandy Berger) and Israeli negotiators about a Jerusalem peace package, noting internal opposition and concerns about leaks. It provides specific names, dates, and a timeline that could be pursued for records of the proposed package, the list of questions for Arafat, and any subsequent communications. While not exposing new wrongdoing, it points to possible undisclosed diplomatic concessions and internal dissent that merit further investigation. Key insights: Clinton considered delaying his G8 summit departure to continue Jerusalem talks.; A proposed Jerusalem package would retain Israeli sovereignty over the Old City while granting Palestinians greater control elsewhere.; Senior officials (Albright, Berger) expressed strong objections after extensive negotiations.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Israeli officials discuss Jerusalem sovereignty with US President Clinton

Israeli officials discuss Jerusalem sovereignty with US President Clinton The passage reveals internal Israeli deliberations on Jerusalem's status, mentioning senior figures (Amnon Lipkin, Danny Yatom, Eli Rubinstein, Shlomo Ben‑Ami) and a direct report to President Clinton. While it suggests possible US‑Israeli coordination on red‑line decisions, the content is largely narrative and lacks concrete transaction details, dates, or actionable leads. It is moderately useful for investigators seeking to trace diplomatic pressure points, but the information is not novel and offers limited immediate investigative steps. Key insights: Amnon Lipkin emphasizes retaining Israeli sovereignty over the Temple Mount while limiting Arab control.; Danny Yatom (likely Mossad chief) urges pragmatic boundary solutions.; Attorney General Eli Rubinstein supports minimal Arab inclusion under Israeli rule.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.