Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-27893House OversightOther

Plaintiffs seek court order to compel Alan Dershowitz to produce documents allegedly proving innocence in alleged minor sexual abuse case

The filing indicates a dispute over undisclosed documents that could contain evidence related to a high‑profile sexual abuse allegation involving a well‑known attorney. While it flags a potential lead Defendant Alan M. Dershowitz claims to have "absolute proof" of non‑abuse but has not produced the d Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel production after a 45‑day delay. The case is filed in Broward

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #014091
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The filing indicates a dispute over undisclosed documents that could contain evidence related to a high‑profile sexual abuse allegation involving a well‑known attorney. While it flags a potential lead Defendant Alan M. Dershowitz claims to have "absolute proof" of non‑abuse but has not produced the d Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel production after a 45‑day delay. The case is filed in Broward

Tags

sexual-abuse-allegationprivacydocument-productioncivil-litigationlegal-filingpotential-evidence-concealmentlegal-exposurehouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 319-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/24/2015 Page 8 of 34 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiff(s), VS. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant(s). / PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS Plaintiffs, Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell, by through their undersigned attorneys, move to compel production of documents relevant to this action that defendant Alan M. Dershowitz has refused to produce. Dershowitz has told numerous media sources that he has collected documents that provide “absolute proof” that he has not sexually abused a minor woman known as “Jane Doe No. 3.” And yet despite having received a valid discovery request for these and other related documents more than 45 days ago, Dershowitz has refused to produce these documents to Edwards and Cassell. Indeed, he has refused to produce any documents to them. Accordingly, the Court should direct Dershowitz to produce these materials forthwith, as well as order him to pay reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees necessitated by his refusal to make any appropriate document production.

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80736-KAM

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

Jane Doe's Motion to Rescind Jeffrey Epstein NPA Names Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz as Alleged Traffickers

Jane Doe's Motion to Rescind Jeffrey Epstein NPA Names Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz as Alleged Traffickers The passage reveals a civil filing that directly links high‑profile figures (Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz) to alleged sexual trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein, and it seeks to overturn the non‑prosecution agreement. While the claim is already public, the document provides a concrete legal avenue (motion to compel production) and specific docket references that could be pursued for evidence, making it a moderately strong investigative lead. Key insights: Jane Doe No. 3 alleges she was trafficked as a minor by Epstein to Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz.; The motion aims to rescind Epstein’s non‑prosecution agreement on CVRA victim‑rights grounds.; Attorneys Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell are representing the victim and have filed a motion to compel documents.

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01368193

Page 20 of 32 The motion claimed that the woman. who was not identified in court documents, had sexual relations as a minor with Prince Andrew in London. New York and on Mr. Epstein's private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Mr. Epstein told the woman to give the prince 'Whatever he demanded" and 'report back to him on the details? the motion said. Buckingham Palace took the unusual step of issuing a statement to rebut the accusations "This relates to longstanding and ongoing civil procee

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Jane Doe's Motion to Rescind Jeffrey Epstein NPA Names Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz as Alleged Traffickers

The passage reveals a civil filing that directly links high‑profile figures (Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz) to alleged sexual trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein, and it seeks to overturn the non‑prose Jane Doe No. 3 alleges she was trafficked as a minor by Epstein to Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz The motion aims to rescind Epstein’s non‑prosecution agreement on CVRA victim‑rights grounds. Atto

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Deposition of Prof. Paul Cassell alleges Alan Dershowitz’s involvement in Jeffrey Epstein sex‑trafficking and possible concealment of evidence

The transcript contains multiple specific allegations linking a high‑profile attorney (Alan Dershowitz) to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex‑trafficking network, references to flight logs, a ‘black book’, a non‑p Cassell claims the pleading alleges Dershowitz abused [REDACTED - Survivor] and “other minors” based on a He asserts that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment when questioned about Dershowitz, s

76p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01412453

Page 1 of 32 Report Created: Monday, April 30, 2018 21:12:50 (GMT) by Nathan Head Research Information: This document contains investigations on: SOUTHERN TRUST CO; SOUTHERN FINANCIAL LLC; DARREN K INDYKE; RICHARD KAHN; JEFFREY E EPSTEIN; JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN https://www.lexisnexis.com/dd/delivery/PrntDoc.do?- jobHandle=1825:640721064&dnldFil... 4/30/2018 EFTA01412453 Page 2 of 32 SOUTHERN TRUST CO 1 Tennessee Court of Appeals Opinion: Alexis Breanna Gladden v. Cumberland Trust a

63p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Court filings reveal alleged non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein and references to high‑profile political figures

The document contains sworn declarations and court orders that reference a secret non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein, claims that the U.S. Government concealed it from victims, and m Petitioners allege the Government violated victims' rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act by hi Court order strikes detailed allegations but acknowledges they exist in the filings. Jane Doe 3’s

17p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.