1 duplicate copy in the archive
Internal law‑firm email arranging deposition of Mr. Epstein in a Jane Doe case and requesting juvenile‑justice records
The email reveals a pending civil deposition of a high‑profile individual (Mr. Epstein, likely Jeffrey Epstein) linked to a Jane Doe victim who was placed in a Department of Juvenile Justice facility. Law firm Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman is scheduling a deposition for Mr. Epstein. The case involves a Jane Doe who attended Milton Center for Girls, a DJJ facility. Paralegal requests a HIPAA rel
Summary
The email reveals a pending civil deposition of a high‑profile individual (Mr. Epstein, likely Jeffrey Epstein) linked to a Jane Doe victim who was placed in a Department of Juvenile Justice facility. Law firm Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman is scheduling a deposition for Mr. Epstein. The case involves a Jane Doe who attended Milton Center for Girls, a DJJ facility. Paralegal requests a HIPAA rel
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
Paralegal Emails Reveal Coordination of Depositions for Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump in 2009
The email chain shows internal law‑firm communications arranging depositions of Jeffrey Epstein and former President Donald Trump, indicating that both were subjects of legal proceedings in 2009. Whil Deposition of "Mr. Trump" scheduled for August 18, 2009. Deposition of "Ms. Maxwell" (likely Ghislaine Maxwell) rescheduled from 8/17 to 9/23/2009. Jeffrey Epstein is directly addressed as a depositi
Email chain reveals scheduled depositions of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Donald Trump in August 2009
The correspondence shows that a deposition of Donald Trump was scheduled for August 18 2009 alongside depositions of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. If true, this provides a concrete date and l Deposition of Mr. Trump set for August 18, 2009. Deposition of Ms. Ghislaine Maxwell rescheduled to September 23, 2009. Deposition of Mr. Epstein being arranged by the same legal team.
Internal law‑firm emails discuss scheduling depositions of Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in a “Jane Doe” case
The chain shows a law firm coordinating depositions of three extremely high‑profile figures—former President Donald Trump, financier Jeffrey Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell—in a matter lab Deposition of Donald Trump scheduled for August 18, 2009. Deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell rescheduled from 8/17 to 9/23, 2009. Request for a deposition date for Jeffrey Epstein.
Paralegal correspondence with Jeffrey Epstein referencing a 'Jane Doe' matter
Paralegal correspondence with Jeffrey Epstein referencing a 'Jane Doe' matter The excerpt shows a routine email exchange between a certified paralegal at a law firm and Jeffrey Epstein mentioning a 'Jane Doe' without any details, dates, transactions, or substantive allegations. It offers a vague lead that could merit a follow‑up to identify the case, but provides no concrete information on actors, financial flows, or misconduct. Key insights: Email chain dated August 11, 2009 between Jessica Cadwell (certified paralegal) and Jeffrey Epstein.; Subject line references a 'Jane Doe' – a placeholder name often used for unidentified or protected individuals.; Cadwell’s signature lists affiliation with Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman, LLP in West Palm Beach, FL.
Internal law‑firm emails discuss depositions of Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in a Jane Doe case
The chain reveals that a Florida law firm was coordinating depositions of high‑profile figures (Trump, Epstein, Maxwell) related to a mysterious "Jane Doe" matter, suggesting possible legal exposure a Deposition of Donald Trump scheduled for August 18, 2009. Deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell rescheduled from 8/17 to 9/23, 2009. Jeffrey Epstein’s deposition date being requested.
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures The filing enumerates numerous specific leads that, if verified, tie Jeffrey Epstein to a wide network of powerful individuals (Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, etc.) and to alleged obstruction of federal investigations, witness intimidation, and a non‑prosecution agreement. It also references concrete documents (exhibits, deposition excerpts, flight logs, FBI emails) that could be pursued for forensic analysis, discovery requests, or FOIA requests. The combination of high‑profile actors, alleged criminal conduct, and detailed procedural allegations makes this a strong investigative lead. Key insights: Edwards alleges Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering substantive questions, creating adverse inferences.; The motion cites a “Holy Grail” journal allegedly listing underage victims and high‑profile contacts (Trump, Clinton, etc.).; Claims that Epstein’s attorneys (including Alan Dershowitz) may have helped suppress victim testimony and influence the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.