Document references alleged sexual misconduct claims involving Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell’s post‑Epstein activities, and Prince AndrewFox Fashion Agency declines collaboration over alleged sex‑trafficking links to Jean‑Luc Brunel
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Case Filed-28848House OversightEdwards' Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment – Legal Argument on Malicious Prosecution and Abuse of Process
November 11, 20251p
Case File
d-28848House OversightEdwards' Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment – Legal Argument on Malicious Prosecution and Abuse of Process
Other
The passage is a standard legal brief arguing that litigation privilege does not bar malicious prosecution and abuse of process claims against Epstein. It contains no new factual allegations, financia Claims that litigation privilege does not apply to malicious prosecution claims against Epstein. Cites Supreme Court (Levin) and district court precedent to support the argument. Distinguishes Epstei
Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #013312
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.